AInsteinBench
Coding agents do development tasks taken from maintainer pull requests in six widely used scientific codebases, such as quantum chemistry and molecular simulation packages.
The Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro model card reports it. Authors include Daoguang Zan of the Multi-SWE-bench team.
- Made by
- ByteDance Seed and collaborators
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Scientific code
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
- Last model added
- December 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We introduce AInsteinBench, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating whether large language model (LLM) agents can operate as scientific computing development agents within real research software ecosystems. Unlike existing scientific reasoning benchmarks which focus on conceptual knowledge, or software engineering benchmarks that emphasize generic feature implementation and issue resolving, AInsteinBench evaluates models in end-to-end scientific development settings grounded in production-grade scientific repositories. The benchmark consists of tasks derived from maintainer-authored pull requests across six widely used scientific codebases, spanning quantum chemistry, quantum computing, molecular dynamics, numerical relativity, fluid dynamics, and cheminformatics. All benchmark tasks are carefully curated through multi-stage filtering and expert review to ensure scientific challenge, adequate test coverage, and well-calibrated difficulty. By leveraging evaluation in executable environments, scientifically meaningful failure modes, and test-driven verification, AInsteinBench measures a model's ability to move beyond surface-level code generation toward the core competencies required for computational scientific research.
Claude 4.5 Opus tops the leaderboard with 44%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Gemini 3 Pro, at 42.8%.
The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Claude 4.5 Opus 44%
- 2
Gemini 3 Pro 42.8%
- 3
DeepSeek-V3.2 37%
- 4 Doubao Seed 1.8 36.7%
- 5 GPT-5 high 35.4%
- 6 Claude 4.5 Sonnet 33.7%
- 7 GPT-5.1 32.9%
- 8 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 29.1%
- 9 GLM-4.6 25.9%
- 10 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 19.3%
- 11 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 7.00%
Source: Official AInsteinBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 4.5 Opus | 44% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | | 42.8% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 37% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Doubao Seed 1.8 | 36.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | GPT-5 | 35.4% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude 4.5 Sonnet | 33.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | GPT-5.1 | 32.9% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 29.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | GLM-4.6 | 25.9% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 19.3% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 7.00% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official AInsteinBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official AInsteinBench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471