113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions.
Agents complete 66 hard tasks in containerized terminals across software, ML, science, security, and operations. Test scripts verify each result, scored as resolution rate.
Knowledge and language 30% expert or harder in 2026
Math and science 88% expert or harder in 2026
Coding 92% expert or harder in 2026
Agents and tools 49% expert or harder in 2026
Professional work 87% expert or harder in 2026
Vision, audio and robotics 15% expert or harder in 2026
Safety and security 84% expert or harder in 2026
The last half year runs through November 13, so its count is partial.
Source: The Benchmark Almanac catalog
Saturation is one reason labs drop a benchmark
22 benchmarks appeared in five or more launch posts and then went a year without one. Labs dropped 10 of them after the best score passed 85%.
Below are the 36 benchmarks launch posts list most often, in the order labs took them up. Each tick is a post.
A major lab reports itA lab that ships frontier or widely used models reports it in a launch post, model card, system card or technical report.
An independent leaderboard runs itIts makers or a third party keep a leaderboard with scores for five or more current models.
An established evaluation group made itFor example Epoch AI, METR, Scale, Vals, ARC Prize, Apollo Research, UK AISI, US CAISI, SecureBio, Arena, HELM or Kaggle.
People use itAbout 100 GitHub stars or 30 Hugging Face upvotes, coverage in a widely read newsletter, or other papers and model cards that run it.
Test sets made only for one paper’s own method, training datasets and renamed copies stay out. The New page lists every find we left out, with the reason.
How to contribute
The almanac is open source. Every change goes through GitHub, and a maintainer checks its source before it lands.