Benchmark Almanac

AL-QASIDA

Only in system cards

Models write in eight dialectal Arabic varieties. Scored on fidelity, understanding, quality and diglossia, including the ADI2 dialect identification score.

Monolingual and crosslingual prompts are scored separately.

Released
December 2024
Kind
Chat and instructions in many languages
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Last in a system card
April 2025
Last model added
April 2025

In the authors’ words

Dialectal Arabic (DA) varieties are under-served by language technologies, particularly large language models (LLMs). This trend threatens to exacerbate existing social inequalities and limits LLM applications, yet the research community lacks operationalized performance measurements in DA. We present a framework that comprehensively assesses LLMs' DA modeling capabilities across four dimensions: fidelity, understanding, quality, and diglossia. We evaluate nine LLMs in eight DA varieties and provide practical recommendations. Our evaluation suggests that LLMs do not produce DA as well as they understand it, not because their DA fluency is poor, but because they are reluctant to generate DA. Further analysis suggests that current post-training can contribute to bias against DA, that few-shot examples can overcome this deficiency, and that otherwise no measurable features of input text correlate well with LLM DA performance.

Abstract of AL-QASIDA: Analyzing LLM Quality and Accuracy Systematically in Dialectal Arabic (arXiv:2412.04193, CC0)
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

No scores here yet

No lab, leaderboard or Epoch AI run has reported a score for AL-QASIDA yet.

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Apr 1, 2025 Cohere Command A technical report ADI2 score in 4 Arabic dialects, no overall (Table 11): monolingual 24.2, crosslingual 33.5 Capabilities

More in Multilingual

All 120 in Multilingual
  • MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
  • WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET. K-EXAONE 90.5%
  • MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language. Qwen3.7-Max 87%
  • CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories. Solar Open 2 90.7%
  • Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy. Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
  • MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%