AMO-Bench
Models solve 50 original math problems at or above IMO difficulty that need only a final answer. Answers are graded automatically for accuracy.
- Made by
- Meituan LongCat Team
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Competition problems with answers
- Level
- Competition
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- June 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- June 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
We present AMO-Bench, an Advanced Mathematical reasoning benchmark with Olympiad level or even higher difficulty, comprising 50 human-crafted problems. Existing benchmarks have widely leveraged high school math competitions for evaluating mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). However, many existing math competitions are becoming less effective for assessing top-tier LLMs due to performance saturation (e.g., AIME24/25). To address this, AMO-Bench introduces more rigorous challenges by ensuring all 50 problems are (1) cross-validated by experts to meet at least the International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) difficulty standards, and (2) entirely original problems to prevent potential performance leakages from data memorization. Moreover, each problem in AMO-Bench requires only a final answer rather than a proof, enabling automatic and robust grading for evaluation. Experimental results across 26 LLMs on AMO-Bench show that even the best-performing model achieves only 52.4% accuracy on AMO-Bench, with most LLMs scoring below 40%. Beyond these poor performances, our further analysis reveals a promising scaling trend with increasing test-time compute on AMO-Bench. These results highlight the significant room for improving the mathematical reasoning in current LLMs. We release AMO-Bench to facilitate further research into advancing the reasoning abilities of language models. https://amo-bench.github.io/
GPT-5 leads with 52.4% among models released by September 2025
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 leads with 66%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 52.4 GPT-5
- 47.8
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 47.6
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 43.6
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
- 40.2 o4-mini
- 38.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 36.8 GLM-4.5
- 34.8
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 34.3
DeepSeek-R1
- 32.3 o3-mini
- 28.8
Qwen3-Max
- 18.2
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
- 18.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 17.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 14.6
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 10.9
DeepSeek-R1
- 10.6 Claude Opus 4
- 7.50 Kimi K2
- 5.20
DeepSeek-V3
- 4.10 GPT-4.1
- 1.50 GPT-4o
- 1 GPT-5 high 52.4%
- 2
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 47.8%
- 3
DeepSeek-V3.1 thinking 47.6%
- 4
LongCat-Flash-Thinking 43.6%
- 5 o4-mini high 40.2%
- 6
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 38.7%
- 7 GLM-4.5 36.8%
- 8
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 34.8%
- 9
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 34.3%
- 10 o3-mini high 32.3%
- 11
Qwen3-Max 28.8%
- 12
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct 18.2%
- 13
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 18.1%
- 14 Claude Sonnet 4.5 17.6%
- 15
LongCat-Flash-Chat 14.6%
- 16
DeepSeek-R1 10.9%
- 17 Claude Opus 4 10.6%
- 18 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 7.50%
- 19
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 5.20%
- 20 GPT-4.1 4.10%
- 21 GPT-4o Nov 2024 1.50%
Source: Official AMO-Bench leaderboard
- 66.0
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
- 60.0
Seed1.8
- 52.4 GPT-5
- 47.8
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking
- 47.6
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 43.6
LongCat-Flash-Thinking
- 40.2 o4-mini
- 40.0
MAI-Code-1-Flash
- 38.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro
- 36.8 GLM-4.5
- 36.3
Falcon H1R 7B
- 34.8
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B
- 34.3
DeepSeek-R1
- 32.3 o3-mini
- 28.8
Qwen3-Max
- 18.2
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
- 18.1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 17.6 Claude Sonnet 4.5
- 14.6
LongCat-Flash-Chat
- 10.9
DeepSeek-R1
- 10.6 Claude Opus 4
- 7.50 Kimi K2
- 5.20
DeepSeek-V3
- 4.10 GPT-4.1
- 1.50 GPT-4o
- 1
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 66%
- 2
Seed1.8 60%
- 3 GPT-5 high 52.4%
- 4
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 47.8%
- 5
DeepSeek-V3.1 thinking 47.6%
- 6
LongCat-Flash-Thinking 43.6%
- 7 o4-mini high 40.2%
- 8
MAI-Code-1-Flash 40%
- 9
Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 38.7%
- 10 GLM-4.5 36.8%
- 11
Falcon H1R 7B 36.3%
- 12
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B 34.8%
- 13
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 34.3%
- 14 o3-mini high 32.3%
- 15
Qwen3-Max 28.8%
- 16
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct 18.2%
- 17
Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 18.1%
- 18 Claude Sonnet 4.5 17.6%
- 19
LongCat-Flash-Chat 14.6%
- 20
DeepSeek-R1 10.9%
- 21 Claude Opus 4 10.6%
- 22 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 7.50%
- 23
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 5.20%
- 24 GPT-4.1 4.10%
- 25 GPT-4o Nov 2024 1.50%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official AMO-Bench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 52.4% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 47.8% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 47.6% | thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 43.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o4-mini | 40.2% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 38.7% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GLM-4.5 | 36.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 34.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 34.3% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | o3-mini | 32.3% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 28.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 18.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 18.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 17.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 14.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 10.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | Claude Opus 4 | 10.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 7.50% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 5.20% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | GPT-4.1 | 4.10% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 1.50% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 66% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 60% | Dec 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | GPT-5 | 52.4% | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 47.8% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 47.6% | thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 43.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | o4-mini | 40.2% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 40% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 9 | | 38.7% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GLM-4.5 | 36.8% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 36.3% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 12 | | 34.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 34.3% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | o3-mini | 32.3% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | | 28.8% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 18.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 18.1% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 17.6% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 14.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | | 10.9% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | Claude Opus 4 | 10.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 7.50% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 5.20% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 24 | GPT-4.1 | 4.10% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 1.50% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official AMO-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official AMO-Bench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in June 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | 40 | AMO Bench | |
| Jan 14, 2026 | 66 | Best of AMO-Bench EN (Avg@16) 61.6 / Heavy Thinking 66.0 | |
| Jan 5, 2026 | 36.3 | AMO-Bench | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 60 | AMO-Bench |
4 system cards report it, from 4 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2026 | | 40 | AMO Bench, Acc (Core reasoning table) | Capabilities |
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 60 | AMO-Bench (Table 1) | Capabilities |
| Jan 23, 2026 | | 66 | AMO-Bench EN (Avg@16), w/ tools, heavy mode (Table 2). Default mode 61.6. AMO-Bench CH 56.8, heavy 67.5 | Capabilities |
| Jan 5, 2026 | | 36.3 | AMO-Bench pass@1 (Table 4). DeepConf@512 35.9 on the 39-problem parser-verifiable subset (Table 7) | Capabilities |
More in Math
- AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
- IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
- HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
- PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked.
Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
- MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
- MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%