Atomic Challenges
Agents solve 22 skill-level offensive security challenges in vulnerability research, network attack simulation and evasion. Scored as challenges solved.
Run by Irregular. The irregular-frontiercyber-and-atomic-challenges record lumps it with FrontierCyber.
- Made by
- Irregular
- Released
- December 2025
- Kind
- Capture-the-flag challenges
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- November 2026
- Last model added
- November 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
GPT-6 Cyber leads with 97%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-6 Cyber leads with 100% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
GPT-6 Cyber leads with 100%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
- 1 GPT-6 Cyber 97%
- 2 GPT-6 Astra 90.9%
- 3 Beam 1.0 57.5%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-6 Cyber 100%
Source: Official Atomic Challenges leaderboard
- 1 GPT-6 Cyber 100%
- 2 GPT-6 Astra 90.9%
- 3 Beam 1.0 57.5%
Sources: Official Atomic Challenges leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Cyber | 97% | Nov 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 90.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Beam 1.0 | 57.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Cyber | 100% | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Cyber | 100% | Nov 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-6 Astra | 90.9% | Sep 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Beam 1.0 | 57.5% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 1 model. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in December 2025 Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in December 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Labs’ model cards
OpenAI’s own number for GPT-6 Astra passed 85% in September 2026
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Atomic Challenges leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | GPT-6 Cyber | 97 | Atomic Challenges, vulnerability research and exploitation 97%, network attack simulation 98%, evasion 63% |
11 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2026 | GPT-6 Cyber system card | 97 | Atomic Challenges, vulnerability research and exploitation 97%, network attack simulation 98%, evasion 63% | Cyber risk |
| Oct 5, 2026 | Beam 1.0 technical report | 57.5 | Irregular CTF suite, Atomic Challenges group, 23 of 40 solved (23 of 50 overall) | Cyber risk |
| Sep 3, 2026 | GPT-6 Astra system card | 90.9 | Irregular Atomic Challenges, 20 of 22 solved (10.1.2.6) | Cyber risk |
| Jul 9, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | Irregular Atomic Challenges, all 22 medium and hard challenges solved at least once, average success Network Attack Simulation 98%, Vulnerability Research and Exploitation 91%, Evasion 56%, no overall score (9.1.2.5) | Cyber risk | |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GPT-5.6 Sol system card | Irregular Atomic Challenges, all 22 medium and hard challenges solved at least once, average success Network Attack Simulation 98%, Vulnerability Research and Exploitation 91%, Evasion 56%, no overall score (9.1.2.5) | Cyber risk | |
| Apr 23, 2026 | GPT-5.5 system card | Irregular atomic challenge suite, network attack simulation 98%, vulnerability research and exploitation 92%, evasion 54%, no overall score (9.1.2.5) | Cyber risk | |
| Mar 5, 2026 | GPT-5.4 system card | Irregular atomic challenge suite, network attack simulation 88%, vulnerability research and exploitation 73%, evasion 48%, no overall score (5.1.2.4) | Cyber risk | |
| Feb 5, 2026 | GPT-5.3 Codex system card | External Evaluations by Irregular, average success rates for Network Attack Simulation 86%, Vulnerability Research and Exploitation 72%, Evasion 53%, no overall score (5.1.2.4) | Cyber risk | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | GPT-5.2 Codex system card addendum | External Evaluations by Irregular, medium and hard challenges only, average success rates Network Attack Simulation 79%, Vulnerability Research and Exploitation 80%, Evasion 49%, no overall score (5.1.2.4) | Cyber risk | |
| Dec 11, 2025 | GPT-5.2 system card addendum | External Evaluations by Irregular, v1 atomic challenge suite, Vulnerability Research and Exploitation 83%, Network Attack Simulation 100%, Evasion 73%, no overall score (4.1.2.4) | Cyber risk | |
| Nov 18, 2025 | GPT-5.1-Codex-Max system card | External evaluations by Irregular, average success rates Network Attack Simulation 37%, Vulnerability Discovery and Exploitation 41%, Evasion 43%, solved 17 of 18 easy, 9 of 17 medium and 0 of 6 hard challenges, no overall score (5.1.2.4) | Cyber risk |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Cyber | 97% Atomic Challenges, vulnerability research and exploitation 97%, network attack simulation 98%, evasion 63% | 100% Leaderboard | −3.0 pts |
More in Cybersecurity
- ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
- ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass.
Muse Wonder 80.4%
- SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
- CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private.
Gemini 4 Argon 100%
- ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%