BIRD-Interact
Models solve ambiguous database tasks by talking with a simulated user, in a conversational mode and an agentic mode. 600 BI and CRUD tasks are checked by executable tests.
Lite set released in June 2025 and the 600-task Full set in August 2025. Ground truth and tests are sent by email request. ICLR 2026 oral.
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Data science and SQL
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on single-turn text-to-SQL tasks, but real-world database applications predominantly require multi-turn interactions to handle ambiguous queries, execution errors, and evolving user requirements. Existing multi-turn benchmarks fall short by treating conversation histories as static context or limiting evaluation to read-only operations, failing to reflect production-grade database assistant challenges. We introduce BIRD-INTERACT, a benchmark that restores this realism through: (1) a comprehensive interaction environment coupling each database with a hierarchical knowledge base, metadata files, and a function-driven user simulator, enabling models to solicit clarifications, retrieve knowledge, and recover from errors without human supervision; (2) two evaluation settings consisting of a pre-defined conversational protocol (c-Interact) and an open-ended agentic setting (a-Interact) where models autonomously decide when to query the user simulator or explore the environment; (3) a challenging task suite covering the full CRUD spectrum for business-intelligence and operational use cases, guarded by executable test cases. Each task features ambiguous and follow-up sub-tasks requiring dynamic interaction. The suite comprises BIRD-INTERACT-FULL (600 tasks, up to 11,796 interactions) for comprehensive performance assessment, and BIRD-INTERACT-LITE (300 tasks with simplified databases) for detailed behavioral analysis and rapid method development. Our empirical results highlight BIRD-INTERACT's difficulty: GPT-5 completes only 8.67% of tasks in c-Interact and 17.00% in a-Interact. Analysis via memory grafting and Interaction Test-time Scaling validates the importance of effective interaction for complex, dynamic text-to-SQL tasks.
GPT-5 leads with 25.5% among models released by August 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 GPT-5 BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact 25.5%
- 2 Claude Sonnet 4 BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact 23.3%
- 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact 20.9%
- 4 o3-mini BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact 20.3%
- 5 Qwen-3-Coder-480B BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact 17.8%
- 6 Claude-Sonnet-3.7 BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact 17.4%
- 7 Deepseek-Chat-V3.1 BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact 15.2%
Source: Official BIRD-Interact leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5 | 25.5% | BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 23.3% | BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 20.9% | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | o3-mini | 20.3% | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Qwen-3-Coder-480B | 17.8% | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude-Sonnet-3.7 | 17.4% | BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Deepseek-Chat-V3.1 | 15.2% | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official BIRD-Interact leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 | BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact | 25.5% | $0.24 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact | 23.3% | $0.51 | ||
| o3-mini | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | 20.3% | $0.07 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 4 | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | 18.4% | $0.29 | ||
| o3-mini | BIRD-Interact-Full; a-Interact | 16.4% | $0.06 | ||
| GPT-5 | BIRD-Interact-Full; c-Interact | 12.6% | $0.08 |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in June 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official BIRD-Interact leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official BIRD-Interact leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471