Benchmark Almanac

CATArena Texas Holdem

Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] 1,506 tops its leaderboard GPT-5 1,463 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Code agents compete in Texas Holdem. The public competition board reports Elo Rating for each agent configuration.

This competition has its own published scores. Harness-only names do not identify base models.

Released
October 2025
Kind
Building whole projects
Level
Expert
Scored
Ranked by matches
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Current evaluation for Large Language Model (LLM) code agents predominantly focus on generating functional code in single-turn scenarios, which fails to evaluate the agent's capability for continuous code optimization and multi-turn iterative development. To bridge this gap, we introduce CATArena, a framework designed to evaluate the evolutionary capabilities of code agents via iterative tournaments. Agents engage in multi-turn tournaments and continuously refine their code through self-reflection and peer-learning based on comprehensive execution feedback. For evaluation, we propose a dual-metric system to decouple static generation proficiency from evolutionary potential. Extensive experiments reveal that an agent's evolutionary potential is not strictly correlated with its initial proficiency. Our analysis further reveals that current agents struggle to concurrently leverage both peer-learning and self-reflection for effective performance gains. Furthermore, the results validate CATArena's high extensibility and resistance to variance tasks, establishing it as a continuous and reliable standard for assessing the evolutionary capability of LLM code agents.

Abstract of CATArena: Evaluating Evolutionary Capabilities of Code Agents via Iterative Tournaments (arXiv:2510.26852, CC0)
13
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track

Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 1,506

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 1,463.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

Bars start at 800.

  1. 1 Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] minimal 1,506
  2. 2 GPT-5 minimal 1,463
  3. 3 OpenAI Codex [base model unspecified] 1,447
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4 minimal 1,372
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified] minimal 1,330
  6. 6 Claude Code [base model unspecified] 1,324
  7. 7 Random 1,215
  8. 8 Qwen Code CLI [base model unspecified] 1,086
  9. 9 Gemini CLI [base model unspecified] 1,052
  10. 10 DeepSeek-V3.1 minimal 981
  11. 11 GLM-4.5 minimal 972
  12. 12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet minimal 935
  13. 13 Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified] minimal 909

Source: Official CATArena Texas Holdem leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] 1,506 minimal Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 1,463 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 OpenAI Codex [base model unspecified] 1,447 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 4 1,372 minimal May 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified] 1,330 minimal Official leaderboard
6 Claude Code [base model unspecified] 1,324 Official leaderboard
7 Random 1,215 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen Code CLI [base model unspecified] 1,086 Official leaderboard
9 Gemini CLI [base model unspecified] 1,052 Official leaderboard
10 DeepSeek-V3.1 981 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GLM-4.5 972 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 935 minimal Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified] 909 minimal Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2025
GPT-5 1,463

Source: Official CATArena Texas Holdem leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 2025 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 2025

Source: Official CATArena Texas Holdem leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471