CATArena Texas Holdem
Code agents compete in Texas Holdem. The public competition board reports Elo Rating for each agent configuration.
This competition has its own published scores. Harness-only names do not identify base models.
- Made by
- AGI-Eval (Meituan)
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Building whole projects
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Ranked by matches
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Current evaluation for Large Language Model (LLM) code agents predominantly focus on generating functional code in single-turn scenarios, which fails to evaluate the agent's capability for continuous code optimization and multi-turn iterative development. To bridge this gap, we introduce CATArena, a framework designed to evaluate the evolutionary capabilities of code agents via iterative tournaments. Agents engage in multi-turn tournaments and continuously refine their code through self-reflection and peer-learning based on comprehensive execution feedback. For evaluation, we propose a dual-metric system to decouple static generation proficiency from evolutionary potential. Extensive experiments reveal that an agent's evolutionary potential is not strictly correlated with its initial proficiency. Our analysis further reveals that current agents struggle to concurrently leverage both peer-learning and self-reflection for effective performance gains. Furthermore, the results validate CATArena's high extensibility and resistance to variance tasks, establishing it as a continuous and reliable standard for assessing the evolutionary capability of LLM code agents.
Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 1,506
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 1,463.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1,506 Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified]
- 1,463 GPT-5
- 1,447 OpenAI Codex [base model unspecified]
- 1,372 Claude Sonnet 4
- 1,330 Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified]
- 1,324 Claude Code [base model unspecified]
- 1,215 Random
- 1,086 Qwen Code CLI [base model unspecified]
- 1,052 Gemini CLI [base model unspecified]
- 981
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 972 GLM-4.5
- 935 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 909 Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified]
Bars start at 800.
- 1 Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] minimal 1,506
- 2 GPT-5 minimal 1,463
- 3 OpenAI Codex [base model unspecified] 1,447
- 4 Claude Sonnet 4 minimal 1,372
- 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified] minimal 1,330
- 6 Claude Code [base model unspecified] 1,324
- 7 Random 1,215
- 8 Qwen Code CLI [base model unspecified] 1,086
- 9 Gemini CLI [base model unspecified] 1,052
- 10
DeepSeek-V3.1 minimal 981
- 11 GLM-4.5 minimal 972
- 12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet minimal 935
- 13 Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified] minimal 909
Source: Official CATArena Texas Holdem leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] | 1,506 | minimal | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | GPT-5 | 1,463 | minimal | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | OpenAI Codex [base model unspecified] | 1,447 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 1,372 | minimal | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified] | 1,330 | minimal | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude Code [base model unspecified] | 1,324 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Random | 1,215 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | Qwen Code CLI [base model unspecified] | 1,086 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Gemini CLI [base model unspecified] | 1,052 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | | 981 | minimal | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | GLM-4.5 | 972 | minimal | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 935 | minimal | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified] | 909 | minimal | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CATArena Texas Holdem leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official CATArena Texas Holdem leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471