Benchmark Almanac

CATArena OIBench-5

GPT-5 0.40 leads since October 2025
Not in model cards

Code agents compete in OIBench-5. The public competition board reports Time AUC for each agent configuration.

This competition has its own published scores. Harness-only names do not identify base models.

Released
October 2025
Kind
Building whole projects
Level
Expert
Scored
Ranked by matches
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Current evaluation for Large Language Model (LLM) code agents predominantly focus on generating functional code in single-turn scenarios, which fails to evaluate the agent's capability for continuous code optimization and multi-turn iterative development. To bridge this gap, we introduce CATArena, a framework designed to evaluate the evolutionary capabilities of code agents via iterative tournaments. Agents engage in multi-turn tournaments and continuously refine their code through self-reflection and peer-learning based on comprehensive execution feedback. For evaluation, we propose a dual-metric system to decouple static generation proficiency from evolutionary potential. Extensive experiments reveal that an agent's evolutionary potential is not strictly correlated with its initial proficiency. Our analysis further reveals that current agents struggle to concurrently leverage both peer-learning and self-reflection for effective performance gains. Furthermore, the results validate CATArena's high extensibility and resistance to variance tasks, establishing it as a continuous and reliable standard for assessing the evolutionary capability of LLM code agents.

Abstract of CATArena: Evaluating Evolutionary Capabilities of Code Agents via Iterative Tournaments (arXiv:2510.26852, CC0)
8
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track

GPT-5 leads with 0.40 among models released by August 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5 minimal 0.40
  2. 2 Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] minimal 0.39
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 4 minimal 0.31
  4. 4 Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified] minimal 0.24
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified] minimal 0.18
  6. 6 GLM-4.5 minimal 0.18
  7. 7 LongCat-Flash-Chat minimal 0.15
  8. 8 DeepSeek-V3.1 minimal 0.04

Source: Official CATArena OIBench-5 leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5 0.40 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen 3 Coder [variant unspecified] 0.39 minimal Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 4 0.31 minimal May 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Doubao Seed 1.6 [variant unspecified] 0.24 minimal Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.5 Pro [variant unspecified] 0.18 minimal Official leaderboard
6 GLM-4.5 0.18 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
7 LongCat-Flash-Chat 0.15 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek-V3.1 0.04 minimal Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Oct 2025
GPT-5 0.40

Source: Official CATArena OIBench-5 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 2025 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 2025

Source: Official CATArena OIBench-5 leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471