Benchmark Almanac

CATArena Pommerman

Gemini Cli [base model unspecified] 1,380 tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Code agents compete in Pommerman. The public competition board reports Elo Rating for each agent configuration.

This competition has its own published scores. Harness-only names do not identify base models.

Released
October 2025
Kind
Building whole projects
Level
Expert
Scored
Ranked by matches
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public

In the authors’ words

Current evaluation for Large Language Model (LLM) code agents predominantly focus on generating functional code in single-turn scenarios, which fails to evaluate the agent's capability for continuous code optimization and multi-turn iterative development. To bridge this gap, we introduce CATArena, a framework designed to evaluate the evolutionary capabilities of code agents via iterative tournaments. Agents engage in multi-turn tournaments and continuously refine their code through self-reflection and peer-learning based on comprehensive execution feedback. For evaluation, we propose a dual-metric system to decouple static generation proficiency from evolutionary potential. Extensive experiments reveal that an agent's evolutionary potential is not strictly correlated with its initial proficiency. Our analysis further reveals that current agents struggle to concurrently leverage both peer-learning and self-reflection for effective performance gains. Furthermore, the results validate CATArena's high extensibility and resistance to variance tasks, establishing it as a continuous and reliable standard for assessing the evolutionary capability of LLM code agents.

Abstract of CATArena: Evaluating Evolutionary Capabilities of Code Agents via Iterative Tournaments (arXiv:2510.26852, CC0)
3
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

Gemini Cli [base model unspecified] tops the leaderboard with 1,380

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Bars start at 1,000.

  1. 1 Gemini Cli [base model unspecified] 1,380
  2. 2 GPT Codex [base model unspecified] 1,250
  3. 3 Qwen Code [base model unspecified] 1,100

Source: Official CATArena Pommerman leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini Cli [base model unspecified] 1,380 Official leaderboard
2 GPT Codex [base model unspecified] 1,250 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen Code [base model unspecified] 1,100 Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471