Benchmark Almanac

ChartMimic

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 81.2 tops its leaderboard Claude 3 Opus 60.3 leads the models we track
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 78.4 leads since November 2025
Only in system cards

Multimodal models write plotting code that reproduces 1,000 charts from scientific papers. Scores compare the rendered chart with the original.

ICLR 2025. VLMEvalKit carries v1 and v2 splits.

Released
June 2024
Kind
Web and app front ends
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last in a system card
November 2025
Last model added
November 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

We introduce a new benchmark, ChartMimic, aimed at assessing the visually-grounded code generation capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs). ChartMimic utilizes information-intensive visual charts and textual instructions as inputs, requiring LMMs to generate the corresponding code for chart rendering. ChartMimic includes 4,800 human-curated (figure, instruction, code) triplets, which represent the authentic chart use cases found in scientific papers across various domains (e.g., Physics, Computer Science, Economics, etc). These charts span 18 regular types and 4 advanced types, diversifying into 201 subcategories. Furthermore, we propose multi-level evaluation metrics to provide an automatic and thorough assessment of the output code and the rendered charts. Unlike existing code generation benchmarks, ChartMimic places emphasis on evaluating LMMs' capacity to harmonize a blend of cognitive capabilities, encompassing visual understanding, code generation, and cross-modal reasoning. The evaluation of 3 proprietary models and 14 open-weight models highlights the substantial challenges posed by ChartMimic. Even the advanced GPT-4o, InternVL2-Llama3-76B only achieved an average score across Direct Mimic and Customized Mimic tasks of 82.2 and 61.6, respectively, indicating significant room for improvement. We anticipate that ChartMimic will inspire the development of LMMs, advancing the pursuit of artificial general intelligence.

Abstract of ChartMimic: Evaluating LMM's Cross-Modal Reasoning Capability via Chart-to-Code Generation (arXiv:2406.09961, CC0)
17
Entries on its own leaderboard, 14 models we track
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 81.2

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is Claude 3 Opus, at 60.3.

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B leads with 78.4, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 81.2
  2. 2 Claude 3 Opus 60.3
  3. 3 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 58.5
  4. 4 GeminiProVision 53.6
  5. 5 InternVL2-26B 44.4
  6. 6 Phi-3-Vision-128K 39.8
  7. 7 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 39.4
  8. 8 InternVL2-8B 36.6
  9. 9 InternVL2-4B 36.1
  10. 10 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 34.0
  11. 11 InternVL2-2B 23.5
  12. 12 CogVLM2-19B-Chat 23.3
  13. 13 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 22.8
  14. 14 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 21.0
  15. 15 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 20.1
  16. 16 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 19.7
  17. 17 Idefics2-8B 16.0

Source: Official ChartMimic leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 81.2 Official leaderboard
2 Claude 3 Opus 60.3 Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 58.5 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
4 GeminiProVision 53.6 Official leaderboard
5 InternVL2-26B 44.4 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Phi-3-Vision-128K 39.8 Official leaderboard
7 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 39.4 May 2024 Official leaderboard
8 InternVL2-8B 36.6 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL2-4B 36.1 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 34.0 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
11 InternVL2-2B 23.5 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
12 CogVLM2-19B-Chat 23.3 May 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 22.8 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
14 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 21.0 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
15 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 20.1 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
16 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 19.7 Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Idefics2-8B 16.0 Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 78.4 Nov 2025 Lab model card
2 Claude 3 Opus 60.3 Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
3 InternVL2-Llama3-76B 58.5 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
4 InternVL2-26B 44.4 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
5 MiniCPM-Llama3-V 2.5 39.4 May 2024 Official leaderboard
6 InternVL2-8B 36.6 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
7 InternVL2-4B 36.1 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct 34.0 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
9 InternVL2-2B 23.5 Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
10 CogVLM2-19B-Chat 23.3 May 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct 22.8 Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
12 llava-v1.6-mistral-7b 21.0 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
13 LLaVA-v1.6-34B 20.1 Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
14 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 19.7 Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Idefics2-8B 16.0 Apr 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2024

Source: Official ChartMimic leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 2024 2025 2026 0.00 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 2024 2025 2026

Sources: Official ChartMimic leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 78.4 ChartMimic (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471