Chrome Production Commit Scanning (Google)
Models scan commits in Chrome's production pipeline for vulnerabilities that were never publicly disclosed. Scored by pass@1 success rate.
The undisclosed vulnerabilities keep it free of contamination. Google says newer competitor models after Claude Opus 4.6 refuse the tasks.
- Made by
- Google (Chrome Security)
- Released
- July 2026
- Kind
- Finding and exploiting real bugs
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- July 2026
- Last model added
- July 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber leads with 72%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber leads with 72% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber pass@1 72%
- 2
Gemini 3.5 Flash pass@1 55%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 pass@1 54%
Source: Official Chrome Production Commit Scanning (Google) leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 72% | pass@1 | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | | 55% | pass@1 | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 54% | pass@1 | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 3 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in July 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Chrome Production Commit Scanning (Google) leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Chrome Production Commit Scanning (Google) leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | 72 | Success Rate on Chrome Production Commit Scanning Pipeline (pass@1) |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 72% Success Rate on Chrome Production Commit Scanning Pipeline (pass@1) | 72% Leaderboard, pass@1 | Same |
More in Cybersecurity
- ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
- ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass.
Muse Wonder 80.4%
- SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
- CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private.
Gemini 4 Argon 100%
- ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%