Benchmark Almanac

CoBench (Anthropic)

Only in system cards

500 real internal Anthropic R&D problems. Percentage solved in one attempt tracks AI R&D acceleration.

v2.1 scores not comparable with earlier CoBench versions.

Made by
Anthropic
Kind
Labs' internal R&D tests
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 5.5 #4 on the capability index
Last in a system card
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 55.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 55.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 55.8% Sep 2026 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Sep 22, 2026 Claude Opus 5.5 system card 55.8 CoBench 2.1, share of 500 internal R&D problems solved in one attempt, API safety filter off. Not comparable with earlier CoBench versions (2.3.4.1, Figure 2.3.4.1.A) AI R&D risk

More in AI research

All 104 in AI research
  • PaperBench In use Agent replicates ICML 2024 papers from scratch. LLM judge grades against author-written hierarchical rubrics. Qwen 3.8 Max 93%
  • MLS-Bench In use Agent must invent one algorithmic change in an ML research scaffold whose gain transfers across settings. Scored relative to human baselines. Claude Fable 5.1 50.3%
  • PostTrainBench 1.2 In use CLI agent gets a base model, one H100 and a time budget to post-train it for a target benchmark. Scored on normalized gain. Claude Fable 5.1 44.6%
  • MLE-bench In use Kaggle-style ML engineering competitions. Agent trains models and is scored against competition leaderboards. GPT-6 Astra 93.8%
  • KernelBench In use Replace PyTorch operators with faster custom GPU kernels. Scored on correctness and speedup. MiniMax-M3 28.8%
  • PMPP-Hard In use Agents write GPU kernels for 69 tasks that must be correct, and on 48 of them also run within 1.25 times the reference time. The score is the area under the solved-tasks curve over a 10-hour budget, out of 690 task-hours. Inkling 2 Small 494.3