Benchmark Almanac

CRSBench

Claude Opus 4.6 82.3% leads since February 2026
Claude Opus 4.6 82.3% leads since February 2026
Only in system cards

Cyber reasoning systems find and patch bugs in 124 C, C++ and Java projects with 315 vulnerabilities. A patch passes only if no ground-truth proof of vulnerability still triggers and functionality tests pass.

The GitHub repo was created on October 31st, 2025, and the public release month is not stated. The dataset is gated behind a data use agreement.

Kind
Finding and exploiting real bugs
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
Last in a system card
July 2026
Last model added
July 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
5
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 82.3% among models released by April 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 82.3%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.6 82.3%
  2. 2 GLM-5.1 68.6%
  3. 3 Gemini 3 Flash 56.9%
  4. 4 GPT-5.4 Mini 54.9%
  5. 5 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.4%

Source: Official CRSBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.6 82.3% Claude Code Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GLM-5.1 68.6% Opencode Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3 Flash 56.9% Gemini CLI Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.4 Mini 54.9% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.4% Claude Code Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.6 82.3% Claude Code Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GLM-5.1 68.6% Opencode Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
3 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash 65.1% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 Gemini 3 Flash 56.9% Gemini CLI Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.4 Mini 54.9% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Haiku 4.5 31.4% Claude Code Oct 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since 2023 3 models have held number one with claims included since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2026

Source: Official CRSBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.6 Gemini 3 Flash Claude Haiku 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.6 Gemini 3 Flash

Sources: Official CRSBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jul 27, 2026 MAI-Cyber-1-Flash model card 65.1 CRSBench, printed 0.651 (POV=1200), metric not defined in the card (External Cyber Benchmark Results) Cyber risk

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%