CTI-REALM
Agents read cyber threat intelligence and build detection rules. A five-step workflow maps MITRE techniques, finds data sources, writes Sigma and KQL rules and tests them on telemetry.
Rules are tested against real telemetry. Scored with a grader model whose judgment is calibrated. In the inspect_evals register since March 2026.
- Released
- March 2026
- Kind
- Finding and exploiting real bugs
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
- Last model added
- February 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
CTI-REALM (Cyber Threat Real World Evaluation and LLM Benchmarking) is a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents' ability to interpret cyber threat intelligence (CTI) and develop detection rules. The benchmark provides a realistic environment that replicates the security analyst workflow. This enables agents to examine CTI reports, execute queries, understand schema structures, and construct detection rules. Evaluation involves emulated attacks of varying complexity across Linux systems, cloud platforms, and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS), with ground truth data for accurate assessment. Agent performance is measured through both final detection results and trajectory-based rewards that capture decision-making effectiveness. This work demonstrates the potential of AI agents to support labor-intensive aspects of detection engineering. Our comprehensive evaluation of 16 frontier models shows that Claude Opus 4.6 (High) achieves the highest overall reward (0.637), followed by Claude Opus 4.5 (0.624) and the GPT-5 family. An ablation study confirms that CTI-specific tools significantly improve agent performance, a variance analysis across repeated runs demonstrates result stability. Finally, a memory augmentation study shows that seeded context can close 33% of the performance gap between smaller and larger models.
Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 63.7% among models released by February 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Claude Opus 4.6 63.7%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.5 62.4%
- 3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 58.7%
- 4 gpt-5-2025-03-01-preview medium 57.2%
- 5 gpt-5.2-2025-03-01-preview medium 57.2%
- 6 gpt-5.1-2025-03-01-preview medium 51.3%
- 7 o3-2025-03-01-preview 47.1%
- 8 gpt-5-mini-2025-03-01-preview 45.1%
- 9 gpt-4.1-2025-03-01-preview 41.9%
- 10 o4-mini-2025-03-01-preview 36%
Source: Official CTI-REALM leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 63.7% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 62.4% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | 58.7% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | gpt-5-2025-03-01-preview | 57.2% | medium | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | gpt-5.2-2025-03-01-preview | 57.2% | medium | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | gpt-5.1-2025-03-01-preview | 51.3% | medium | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | o3-2025-03-01-preview | 47.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | gpt-5-mini-2025-03-01-preview | 45.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | gpt-4.1-2025-03-01-preview | 41.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | o4-mini-2025-03-01-preview | 36% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official CTI-REALM leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official CTI-REALM leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Cybersecurity
- ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
- ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
- CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass.
Muse Wonder 80.4%
- SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
- CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private.
Gemini 4 Argon 100%
- ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%