Benchmark Almanac

CyberGym-E2E (615 tasks)

Gemini 3 Pro 22.6% leads since June 2026
Not in model cards

Agents discover and demonstrate vulnerabilities on the older 615-task cohort. The headline is cumulative stage S3 success.

Agents discover and demonstrate vulnerabilities on the older 615-task cohort. The headline is cumulative stage S3 success.

Released
June 2026
Kind
Finding and exploiting real bugs
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
Last model added
December 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI has the potential to transform cybersecurity by enabling systems that can autonomously detect, analyze, and remediate software vulnerabilities. However, existing cybersecurity evaluations of AI systems are limited in scale or scope, and fail to capture the end-to-end lifecycle of real-world software vulnerability discovery and remediation. To address this gap, we propose CyberGym-E2E, a large-scale and realistic end-to-end cybersecurity benchmark that comprehensively evaluates AI agents' abilities across the full lifecycle of vulnerability discovery, PoC generation, and patch generation. CyberGym-E2E is comprehensive and scalable, as we build an automated, agent-enhanced pipeline for transforming open-source vulnerability data into realistic evaluation environments. Currently, the benchmark consists of 920 real-world vulnerabilities across 139 different open-source projects.

Abstract of CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents' End-to-End Cybersecurity Capabilities (arXiv:2606.04460, CC0)
4
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 22.6% among models released by December 2025

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro $10 / 90 min 22.6%
  2. 2 GPT-5.2 $10 / 90 min 20.7%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.5 $10 / 90 min 19.2%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 $10 / 90 min 10.6%

Source: Official CyberGym-E2E (615 tasks) leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 22.6% $10 / 90 min, Gemini CLI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.2 20.7% $10 / 90 min, Codex Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.5 19.2% $10 / 90 min, Claude Code Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 10.6% $10 / 90 min, Claude Code Sep 2025 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026
Gemini 3 Pro 22.6%

Source: Official CyberGym-E2E (615 tasks) leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Claude Sonnet 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Gemini 3 Pro Claude Sonnet 4.5

Source: Official CyberGym-E2E (615 tasks) leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%