DeepResearch Bench II
Deep research agents write reports for 132 research briefs in 22 domains, each derived from a review article they may not consult. A judge model checks 9,287 expert criteria.
Same team as DeepResearch Bench. In August 2026 the judge moved from Gemini 2.5 Pro to GPT-5.5, so the two leaderboards are not comparable. Mercor also runs it on about 30 models.
- Made by
- University of Science and Technology of China and Metastone Technology
- Released
- January 2026
- Kind
- Deep research
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Last model added
- February 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Deep Research Agents (DRA) aim to help users search the web, synthesize information, and deliver comprehensive investigative reports. Prior benchmarks often either under-evaluate a system's ability to produce meaningful insights and high-quality writing, or adopt coarse or LLM-defined criteria that are hard to verify and can diverge from human expert judgment. To address these issues, we introduce Deep Research Bench II, a new benchmark for evaluating DRAs. It contains 132 grounded research tasks across 22 domains; for each task, an agent must produce a research report that is evaluated by a set of 9,430 fine-grained binary rubrics in total, covering three dimensions: information recall, analysis, and presentation. All rubrics are derived from carefully selected expert-written investigative articles and are constructed through a four-stage LLM+human pipeline that combines automatic extraction with over 400 human-hours of expert review, ensuring that the criteria are verifiable and aligned with human expert judgment. We evaluate several state-of-the-art deep-research agents on Deep Research Bench II and find that even the strongest models satisfy fewer than 50% of the rubrics, revealing a substantial gap between current DRAs and human experts. We release the benchmark, evaluation scripts, and all rubrics at https://github.com/imlrz/DeepResearch-Bench-II to facilitate future research on deep-rearch agents.
TerseMind DeepResearch tops the leaderboard with 68.8%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is OpenAI deep research, at 43.1%.
- 68.8 TerseMind DeepResearch
- 63.3 DuMate-DeepResearch
- 62.7 Truna
- 61.9 Xiaoyi DeepResearch 7.0
- 60.5 Beane Harness by Jatin Hans
- 57.6 ATH-Voicepica-DeepResearch
- 57.0 deep-cove-research-pro
- 44.1 JD JoyWork
- 43.1 OpenAI deep research
- 41.5 Gemini 3 Pro Deep Research
- 39.9 Gemini 2.5 Pro Deep Research
- 37.3 Doubao Deep Research
- 33.6 Perplexity Research
- 1 TerseMind DeepResearch GPT-5.5 evaluator 68.8%
- 2 DuMate-DeepResearch GPT-5.5 evaluator 63.3%
- 3 Truna GPT-5.5 evaluator 62.7%
- 4 Xiaoyi DeepResearch 7.0 GPT-5.5 evaluator 61.9%
- 5 Beane Harness by Jatin Hans GPT-5.5 evaluator 60.5%
- 6 ATH-Voicepica-DeepResearch GPT-5.5 evaluator 57.6%
- 7 deep-cove-research-pro GPT-5.5 evaluator 57%
- 8 JD JoyWork GPT-5.5 evaluator 44.1%
- 9 OpenAI deep research GPT-5.5 evaluator 43.1%
- 10 Gemini 3 Pro Deep Research GPT-5.5 evaluator 41.5%
- 11 Gemini 2.5 Pro Deep Research GPT-5.5 evaluator 39.9%
- 12 Doubao Deep Research GPT-5.5 evaluator 37.3%
- 13 Perplexity Research GPT-5.5 evaluator 33.6%
Source: Official DeepResearch Bench II leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TerseMind DeepResearch | 68.8% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | DuMate-DeepResearch | 63.3% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | Truna | 62.7% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Xiaoyi DeepResearch 7.0 | 61.9% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Beane Harness by Jatin Hans | 60.5% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | ATH-Voicepica-DeepResearch | 57.6% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | deep-cove-research-pro | 57% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | JD JoyWork | 44.1% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | OpenAI deep research | 43.1% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Gemini 3 Pro Deep Research | 41.5% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Deep Research | 39.9% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Doubao Deep Research | 37.3% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Perplexity Research | 33.6% | GPT-5.5 evaluator | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official DeepResearch Bench II leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%