DeepSeek Chinese functional writing evaluation
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 62.6% Models answer 3,170 everyday Chinese writing prompts such as reports, emails and speeches. Pairwise judging against a baseline model gives a win rate.
In-house DeepSeek evaluation. The prompts are not public.
- Made by
- DeepSeek
- Released
- April 2026
- Kind
- Taste and style
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Ranked by matches
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro #69 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- April 2026
- Last model added
- April 2026
Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro has a rating here, from its lab’s own post
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs. A rating ranks a model only against others rated in the same arena at the same time, so these don’t show who leads.
- 1 DeepSeek-V4-Pro 62.6%
Source: Labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | 62.6% | Apr 2026 | Lab model card |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2026 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro technical report | 62.6 | Chinese Functional Writing, total DS win rate vs Gemini-3.1-Pro over 3,170 prompts, Gemini 34.10, tie 3.25 (Table 12) | Capabilities |
More in Writing and taste
- Design Bench (Moonshot) In use Models make graphic designs from direct prompts or few-shot reference images. An automated grader rates the results as Elo scores. Kimi K3.1 Pro 957
- WritingBench Fading Models complete 1,000 real-world writing requests across 6 domains and 100 subdomains. A judge model scores each reply on five query-specific criteria. GPT-5 83.9
- Creative Writing (MiniMax in-house) Only in system cards Models write creative pieces for real Hailuo AI user requests. Automatic assessments score the writing.
MiniMax-Text-01 81.3% - Slide generation human evaluation (Z.ai) Only in system cards People compare HTML slide decks from two models on content, layout and visual quality. Metric is overall win rate. GLM-5 67.5%
- Task-dependent output homogenization evaluation Only in system cards Models answer prompts several times. A judge scores functional diversity where it is wanted and consistency where one answer is right.
Muse Spark 0.21 - DeepSeek Chinese creative writing evaluation Only in system cards Models write Chinese fiction, prose, poetry and lyrics for 2,837 prompts. Pairwise judging gives separate win rates for instruction following and writing quality.