Benchmark Almanac

Design2Code

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 90.4 tops its leaderboard GPT-4V 87.2 leads the models we track
Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.4 leads since September 2025
Fading

Models turn screenshots of 484 real webpages into HTML and CSS. Automatic metrics compare the rendered page with the original on layout, text, position, color and CLIP similarity.

The repo also ships Design2Code-HARD, 80 harder pages from GitHub Pages, as a separate test set. Reports often give the averaged visual score or the CLIP score.

Released
March 2024
Kind
Web and app front ends
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
April 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
April 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Generative AI has made rapid advancements in recent years, achieving unprecedented capabilities in multimodal understanding and code generation. This can enable a new paradigm of front-end development in which multimodal large language models (MLLMs) directly convert visual designs into code implementations. In this work, we construct Design2Code - the first real-world benchmark for this task. Specifically, we manually curate 484 diverse real-world webpages as test cases and develop a set of automatic evaluation metrics to assess how well current multimodal LLMs can generate the code implementations that directly render into the given reference webpages, given the screenshots as input. We also complement automatic metrics with comprehensive human evaluations to validate the performance ranking. To rigorously benchmark MLLMs, we test various multimodal prompting methods on frontier models such as GPT-4o, GPT-4V, Gemini, and Claude. Our fine-grained break-down metrics indicate that models mostly lag in recalling visual elements from the input webpages and generating correct layout designs.

Abstract of Design2Code: Benchmarking Multimodal Code Generation for Automated Front-End Engineering (arXiv:2403.03163, CC0)
9
Entries on its own leaderboard, 5 models we track
5
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
5
System cards report it, from 3 labs

GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 90.4

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-4V, at 87.2.

Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B leads with 93.4, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in April 2024, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) Direct 90.4
  2. 2 WebSight VLM-8B 87.6
  3. 3 GPT-4V Text-Augmented 87.2
  4. 4 Claude 3 Opus Direct 87.0
  5. 5 Design2Code -18B 85.8
  6. 6 LLaVA 1.6-7B Direct 84.6
  7. 7 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat Direct 84.5
  8. 8 Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision Direct 84.4
  9. 9 Idefics2-8B Direct 81.7

Source: Official Design2Code leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 90.4 Direct Official leaderboard
2 WebSight VLM-8B 87.6 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4V 87.2 Text-Augmented Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
4 Claude 3 Opus 87.0 Direct Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Design2Code -18B 85.8 Official leaderboard
6 LLaVA 1.6-7B 84.6 Direct Official leaderboard
7 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 84.5 Direct Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision 84.4 Direct Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Idefics2-8B 81.7 Direct Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.4 Sep 2025 Lab model card
2 GPT-4V 87.2 Text-Augmented Nov 2023 Official leaderboard
3 Claude 3 Opus 87.0 Direct Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
4 DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat 84.5 Direct Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision 84.4 Direct Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Idefics2-8B 81.7 Direct Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
7 STEP3-VL-10B 79.5 Jan 2026 Lab model card

Labs report scores for 2 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
GPT-4V
Direct
87.2
Claude 3 Opus
Text-Augmen…
87.0
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat
Self-Revisi… Text-Augmen…
84.5
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision
Self-Revisi…
84.4
Idefics2-8B
Self-Revisi… Direct
81.7

Source: Official Design2Code leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-4V Text-Augmented 87.2
GPT-4V Self-Revision 87.2
Claude 3 Opus Direct 87.0
GPT-4V Direct 86.9
Claude 3 Opus Text-Augmented 86.6
Claude 3 Opus Self-Revision 86.6
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat Direct 84.5
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision Direct 84.4
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision Text-Augmented 84.4
Gemini 1.0 Pro Vision Self-Revision 84.3
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat Text-Augmented 84.3
Idefics2-8B Direct 81.7
DeepSeek-VL-7B-Chat Self-Revision 79.9
Idefics2-8B Text-Augmented 78.7
Idefics2-8B Self-Revision 78.4

Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

OpenAI Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Apr 2024
GPT-4V 87.2
Lab claims Not tested since Jan 2026

Sources: Official Design2Code leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 2024 2025 2026 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 2024 2025 2026

Sources: Official Design2Code leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in April 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Z.ai
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Apr 1, 2026 GLM-5V-Turbo 94.8 Design2Code 94.8
Dec 8, 2025 GLM-4.6V 88.6 Design2Code
Sep 23, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 93.4 Design2Code
Aug 11, 2025 GLM-4.5V 82.2 Design2Code
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking 64.7 Design2Code

5 system cards report it, from 3 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 79.5 Design2Code, SeRe (Table 1). Design2Code (hard) 54.69 Capabilities
Jan 1, 2026 GLM-4.6V technical report 88.6 Design2Code, GLM-4.6V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Nov 26, 2025 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B technical report 93.4 Design2Code (Table 2) Capabilities
Aug 13, 2025 GLM-4.5V technical report 82.2 Design2Code, GLM-4.5V thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Jul 1, 2025 GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking technical report 64.7 Design2Code, GLM-4.1V-9B-Thinking thinking (Table 2) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471