DiscoX
Models translate 200 expert texts between Chinese and English at discourse level, averaging over 1,700 tokens each. Metric-S, a reference-free judge, scores accuracy, fluency and appropriateness, and the overall score is their sum.
Texts come from 7 expert domains.
- Made by
- ByteDance Seed and collaborators (Zhao et al.)
- Released
- November 2025
- Kind
- Translation
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- February 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- March 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
The evaluation of discourse-level translation in expert domains remains inadequate, despite its centrality to knowledge dissemination and cross-lingual scholarly communication. While these translations demand discourse-level coherence and strict terminological precision, current evaluation methods predominantly focus on segment-level accuracy and fluency. To address this limitation, we introduce DiscoX, a new benchmark for discourse-level and expert-level Chinese-English translation. It comprises 200 professionally-curated texts from 7 domains, with an average length exceeding 1700 tokens. To evaluate performance on DiscoX, we also develop Metric-S, a reference-free system that provides fine-grained automatic assessments across accuracy, fluency, and appropriateness. Metric-S demonstrates strong consistency with human judgments, significantly outperforming existing metrics. Our experiments reveal a remarkable performance gap: even the most advanced LLMs still trail human experts on these tasks. This finding validates the difficulty of DiscoX and underscores the challenges that remain in achieving professional-grade machine translation. The proposed benchmark and evaluation system provide a robust framework for more rigorous evaluation, facilitating future advancements in LLM-based translation.
Human Expert tops the leaderboard with 80.2
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 76.7.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 80.2 Human Expert
- 76.7 GPT-5
- 71.3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 59.7 Qwen-3-235B (snapshot unspecified)
- 55.8 Kimi-K2 (snapshot unspecified)
- 55.6 o3
- 55.1 o4-mini
- 54.0 Claude-4 (snapshot unspecified)
- 49.6 GPT-4.1
- 49.6 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified)
- 49.5 Doubao-1.6 (snapshot unspecified)
- 46.4 Youdao-14B
- 46.1 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 44.0 Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified)
- 43.8 Grok 4
- 39.9 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified)
- 39.4
Qwen3-14B
- 37.1 Google-NMT
- 28.4
Qwen3-8B
- 1 Human Expert 80.2
- 2 GPT-5 high 76.7
- 3 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 71.3
- 4 Qwen-3-235B (snapshot unspecified) 59.7
- 5 Kimi-K2 (snapshot unspecified) 55.8
- 6 o3 high 55.6
- 7 o4-mini high 55.1
- 8 Claude-4 (snapshot unspecified) 54.0
- 9 GPT-4.1 49.6
- 10 DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) 49.6
- 11 Doubao-1.6 (snapshot unspecified) thinking 49.5
- 12 Youdao-14B 46.4
- 13 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 46.1
- 14 Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified) 44.0
- 15 Grok 4 43.8
- 16 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 39.9
- 17
Qwen3-14B 39.4
- 18 Google-NMT 37.1
- 19
Qwen3-8B 28.4
Source: Official DiscoX leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Human Expert | 80.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GPT-5 | 76.7 | high | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 71.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | Qwen-3-235B (snapshot unspecified) | 59.7 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Kimi-K2 (snapshot unspecified) | 55.8 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | o3 | 55.6 | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | o4-mini | 55.1 | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Claude-4 (snapshot unspecified) | 54.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | GPT-4.1 | 49.6 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | DeepSeek-V3 (snapshot unspecified) | 49.6 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Doubao-1.6 (snapshot unspecified) | 49.5 | thinking | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Youdao-14B | 46.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 46.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Gemini-2.5-Flash-Lite (snapshot unspecified) | 44.0 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Grok 4 | 43.8 | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) | 39.9 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 39.4 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | Google-NMT | 37.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 19 | | 28.4 | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official DiscoX leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official DiscoX leaderboard
Labs headline it less often now, last in February 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2026 | 82 | Disco-X | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | 74.6 | DiscoX |
2 system cards report it, from 1 lab
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | | 74.6 | DiscoX (Table 4) | Capabilities |
| Feb 14, 2026 | | 82 | Disco-X (Table 3) | Capabilities |
More in Multilingual
- MMMLU In use MMLU professionally translated into 14 languages. Multiple-choice accuracy. Claude Mythos Preview 92.7%
- WMT24++ In use English-to-55-language translation of WMT24 test data. Scored with automatic metrics such as MetricX or xCOMET.
K-EXAONE 90.5%
- MMLU-ProX In use MMLU-Pro translated into up to 29 languages with expert review. Multiple-choice accuracy per language.
Qwen3.7-Max 87%
- CLIcK In use Models answer 1,995 multiple-choice questions on Korean language and culture. Questions come from official Korean exams and textbooks in eleven categories.
Solar Open 2 90.7%
- Global MMLU Lite 3.0 In use Models answer 400 human-translated MMLU questions per language in 23 languages. Version 3.0 adds Czech, Hungarian, Oriya, Slovak and Tajik and updates Italian. Accuracy.
Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B-A55B Base 90.1%
- MMMB In use Models answer multiple-choice questions about images in six languages across 15 categories. The set has about 12,000 questions. LFM2.5-VL-3B 83%