FrontierCAD
Agents build 39 machined parts from engineering drawings and place parts into 16 assemblies, in their own coding harnesses. A verifier that tolerates rotation and checks hole positions scores the geometry.
A part passes at a score of 0.97, and no model passed any part in the first report. It scores geometry only, while CAD Arena also scores editability. Seven models in the first report.
- Made by
- Normal Research
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- CAD models
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
No scores here yet
We have no scores for FrontierCAD yet.
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Engineering and CAD
- EEBench In use 13 electrical-engineering circuit and PCB design tasks graded by deterministic build checks, simulation and BOM constraints. No LLM judge.
Gemini 4 Carbon 83.9% - Parametric CAD Bench In use Agents author editable parametric FreeCAD part designs, graded against held-back references for geometry and spec consistency. Claude Opus 5.5 61%
- 3DCodeBench In use Agentic procedural 3D modeling via code: author engine-ready 3D assets through software APIs. Graded for executability and shape fidelity.
LongCat-2.5 55.4% - CADGenBench Only in system cards Agents construct CAD models from design prompts. The generation split is graded for executability and geometric correctness. Claude Fable 5 45.1%
- PartBench Only in system cards Parametric mechanical part design and CAD-style generation, graded for geometric and manufacturing fidelity. Grok 4.6 58.5%
- LMBuild Not in model cards Language model agents design 3D structures as parts, joints, materials and assembly steps. Scoring checks that the structures can be built and work as intended. GPT-6 Astra 66.5%