Benchmark Almanac

GameDevBench

Claude Opus 5.5 70.6% leads since September 2026
Not in model cards

Agents complete game development tasks in the Godot engine, derived from web and video tutorials, across 2D and 3D graphics, user interfaces and gameplay logic. Tests in the engine check each result.

ICML 2026. The task count grew from 132 in the first paper version to 333, so early scores may not compare. The board is in the repo README. Repo has 151 stars.

Released
February 2026
Kind
Building whole projects
Level
University
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Despite rapid progress on coding agents, progress on their multimodal counterparts has lagged behind. A key challenge is the scarcity of evaluation testbeds that combine the complexity of software development with the need for deep multimodal understanding. In game development, agents must navigate large, dense codebases while manipulating intrinsically multimodal assets such as shaders, sprites, and animations within a visual game scene. We present GameDevBench, the first benchmark for evaluating agents on game development tasks. GameDevBench consists of 333 tasks derived from web and video tutorials. Tasks require significant multimodal understanding and are complex: the average solution requires over three times the lines of code and file changes compared to prior software development benchmarks. Agents struggle with game development, with the best agent and method solving only 53.8% of tasks. We find a strong correlation between perceived task difficulty and multimodal complexity, with average success rate dropping from 51.4% on gameplay-oriented tasks to 33.0% on 2D graphics tasks. To improve multimodal capability, we introduce two simple image- and video-based feedback mechanisms for agents. Despite their simplicity, these methods consistently improve performance, increasing GPT-5.4's performance from 41.1% to 52.0% when given visual feedback.

Abstract of GameDevBench: Evaluating Agentic Capabilities Through Game Development (arXiv:2602.11103, CC0)
18
Entries on its own leaderboard, 17 models we track

Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 70.6%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 5.5 xhigh 70.6%
  2. 2 GPT-6.1 Sol xhigh 70%
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra high 68.8%
  4. 4 Claude Fable 5 xhigh 67.3%
  5. 5 GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh 63.7%
  6. 6 Muse Spark 1.2 high 61%
  7. 7 Kimi K3 58%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 4.8 55.9%
  9. 9 GPT-5.5 54.7%
  10. 10 Gemini 3 Pro 53.8%
  11. 11 GPT-5.4 52%
  12. 12 Gemini 3 Flash 46.8%
  13. 13 GPT-5.4 Mini 43.2%
  14. 14 GLM-5.2 38.4%
  15. 15 Claude Sonnet 4.5 34.8%
  16. 16 Kimi K2.5 20.7%
  17. 17 Claude Haiku 4.5 18.6%
  18. 18 qwen3.5-397b 5.40%

Source: Official GameDevBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 5.5 70.6% xhigh, Claude Code Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-6.1 Sol 70% xhigh, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-6 Astra 68.8% high, Codex Sep 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Fable 5 67.3% xhigh, Claude Code Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.6 Sol 63.7% xhigh, Codex Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
6 Muse Spark 1.2 61% high, Muse Code Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
7 Kimi K3 58% Kimi Code Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Opus 4.8 55.9% Claude Code May 2026 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.5 54.7% Codex Apr 2026 Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 3 Pro 53.8% Gemini CLI Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-5.4 52% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 3 Flash 46.8% Gemini CLI Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
13 GPT-5.4 Mini 43.2% Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
14 GLM-5.2 38.4% OpenCode Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
15 Claude Sonnet 4.5 34.8% Claude Code Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Kimi K2.5 20.7% OpenHands Jan 2026 Official leaderboard
17 Claude Haiku 4.5 18.6% Claude Code Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
18 qwen3.5-397b 5.40% OpenHands Official leaderboard

6 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in February 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Google DeepMind OpenAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard 6 leaders

Source: Official GameDevBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.8 Gemini 3 Pro Claude Sonnet 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 4.8

Source: Official GameDevBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471