Hermes Bench
Agents in Hermes Agent do 150 tasks across 25 categories, such as research, diagrams, memory, tool use and safety. Graders check the files and state left behind.
Launched October 6th, 2026 as part of the Hermes Index. 24 tasks are multi-turn.
- Made by
- Nous Research
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- General assistants
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 leads with 76.7%
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
- 76.7 Claude Opus 5.5
- 74.4 Grok 4.7
- 73.9 GPT-6.1 Sol
- 73.7 GPT-6 Astra
- 73.5 GPT-6 Sol
- 73.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5
- 71.8 GLM-5.3
- 71.5 Kimi K3
- 71.0 Claude Haiku 5.5
- 70.7
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- 70.5
Qwen 3.8 Max
- 70.5 GPT-6 Luna
- 69.2
Step 5 Preview
- 68.9 GLM-5.3-Flash
- 63.4 Nemotron Super 3.5
- 62.2
Gemini 3.8 Flash
- 58.6
Tencent Hy4 preview
- 53.8
Ling-3.0-flash
- 1 Claude Opus 5.5 76.7%
- 2 Grok 4.7 74.4%
- 3 GPT-6.1 Sol 73.9%
- 4 GPT-6 Astra 73.7%
- 5 GPT-6 Sol 73.5%
- 6 Claude Sonnet 5.5 73.5%
- 7 GLM-5.3 71.8%
- 8 Kimi K3 71.5%
- 9 Claude Haiku 5.5 71%
- 10
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 70.7%
- 11
Qwen 3.8 Max 70.5%
- 12 GPT-6 Luna 70.5%
- 13
Step 5 Preview 69.2%
- 14 GLM-5.3-Flash 68.9%
- 15 Nemotron Super 3.5 63.4%
- 16
Gemini 3.8 Flash 62.2%
- 17
Tencent Hy4 preview 58.6%
- 18
Ling-3.0-flash 53.8%
Source: Official Hermes Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 76.7% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Grok 4.7 | 74.4% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 73.9% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | 73.7% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | GPT-6 Sol | 73.5% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 73.5% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GLM-5.3 | 71.8% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | Kimi K3 | 71.5% | Hermes Agent | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 71% | Hermes Agent | Oct 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | | 70.7% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 70.5% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | GPT-6 Luna | 70.5% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 69.2% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | GLM-5.3-Flash | 68.9% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | Nemotron Super 3.5 | 63.4% | Hermes Agent | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 62.2% | Hermes Agent | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 17 | | 58.6% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 18 | | 53.8% | Hermes Agent | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
The best score, 76.7%, costs $0.52 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. GLM-5.3 comes within 4.9 points of the best for $0.18 a task, 3 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
Source: Official Hermes Bench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Hermes Agent | 76.7% | $0.52 | ||
| Grok 4.7 | Hermes Agent | 74.4% | $0.69 | ||
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Hermes Agent | 73.9% | $0.26 | ||
| GPT-6 Astra | Hermes Agent | 73.7% | $1.52 | ||
| GPT-6 Sol | Hermes Agent | 73.5% | $0.26 | ||
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Hermes Agent | 73.5% | $0.25 | ||
| GLM-5.3 | Hermes Agent | 71.8% | $0.18 | ||
| Kimi K3 | Hermes Agent | 71.5% | $0.18 | ||
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | Hermes Agent | 71% | $0.01 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 70.7% | $0.02 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 70.5% | $0.32 | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | Hermes Agent | 70.5% | $0.01 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 69.2% | $0.17 | ||
| GLM-5.3-Flash | Hermes Agent | 68.9% | $0.02 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 62.2% | $0.64 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 58.6% | $0.09 | ||
| | Hermes Agent | 53.8% | $0.004 |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Hermes Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Hermes Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%