Benchmark Almanac

Honesty human feedback win rate (Anthropic)

Claude 3 Sonnet 69% leads since September 2025
Only in system cards

Crowdworkers try to make models say something false and pick the more honest reply in head-to-head chats. Score is the win rate against a baseline.

In-house Anthropic evaluation. The baseline model was Claude Sonnet 4, so 50% means equal honesty.

Made by
Anthropic
Released
September 2025
Kind
Hallucination rates
Level
Everyday
Scored
Ranked by votes
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
Last in a system card
February 2026
Last model added
February 2026
6
Models scored in lab cards
6
System cards report it, from 1 lab

6 models have ratings here, all from their labs’ own posts

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs. A rating ranks a model only against others rated in the same arena at the same time, so these don’t show who leads.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude 3 Sonnet 69%
  2. 2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 66%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.6 61%
  4. 4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 57%
  5. 5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 55%
  6. 6 Claude 3.5 Haiku 42%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3 Sonnet 69% Mar 2024 Lab model card
2 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 66% Jun 2024 Lab model card
3 Claude Opus 4.6 61% Feb 2026 Lab model card
4 Claude Sonnet 4.5 57% Sep 2025 Lab model card
5 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 55% Oct 2024 Lab model card
6 Claude 3.5 Haiku 42% Oct 2024 Lab model card

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Lab claims Not tested since Feb 2026

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Sonnet

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

6 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 5, 2026 Claude Opus 4.6 system card 61 Honesty HF win rate against a Claude Opus 4.5 baseline, 64k thinking, value printed on chart; 54 without thinking (Figure 4.1.A) Hallucination
Sep 29, 2025 Claude Sonnet 4.5 system card 57 Honesty HF win rate against Claude Sonnet 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5 with 16k thinking 57. Without thinking 50 (Figure 3.1.A) Hallucination
Oct 22, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) model card 55 Human feedback win rate vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet baseline, Honesty (adversarial scenario) 55 (Figure 2) Safety
Oct 22, 2024 Claude 3.5 Haiku model card 42 Human feedback win rate vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet baseline, Honesty (adversarial scenario) 42 (Figure 2) Safety
Jun 20, 2024 Claude 3.5 Sonnet model card 66 Honesty, human preference win rate vs Claude 3 Opus baseline, adversarial scenarios (Figure 3) Safety
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card 69 Human preference win rate vs Helpful-only baseline, Honesty (adversarial scenario) 69 (Figure 8) Safety

More in Factuality

All 74 in Factuality
  • SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references. Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
  • HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy. Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
  • SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
  • Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. GPT-6 Astra 4.20%
  • Internal adversarially-designed factuality evaluations In use Models answer adversarial questions in nine categories such as history, math and code. Scored on agreement with human ideal responses. GPT-6 Luna 7.60%
  • AA-Omniscience v1.1 In use Models answer 3,000 knowledge questions in six domains without tools and may abstain. The index adds correct answers and subtracts wrong ones. Inkling 2 Small 16.1