McEval
Models complete, explain and generate code in 40 programming languages across about 16,000 test samples. Scored by test execution.
Tencent reports it for Hunyuan-A13B in fast-thinking mode.
- Made by
- Beihang University and others (Chai et al.)
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- Function-level problems
- Level
- School
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-4o May 2024 #161 on the capability index
- Last in a system card
- June 2025
- Last model added
- June 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Code large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable advances in code understanding, completion, and generation tasks. Programming benchmarks, comprised of a selection of code challenges and corresponding test cases, serve as a standard to evaluate the capability of different LLMs in such tasks. However, most existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are still restricted to a limited number of languages, where other languages are translated from the Python samples (e.g. MultiPL-E) degrading the data diversity. To further facilitate the research of code LLMs, we propose a massively multilingual code benchmark covering 40 programming languages (McEval) with 16K test samples, which substantially pushes the limits of code LLMs in multilingual scenarios. The benchmark contains challenging code completion, understanding, and generation evaluation tasks with finely curated massively multilingual instruction corpora McEval-Instruct. In addition, we introduce an effective multilingual coder mCoder trained on McEval-Instruct to support multilingual programming language generation. Extensive experimental results on McEval show that there is still a difficult journey between open-source models and closed-source LLMs (e.g. GPT-series models) in numerous languages. The instruction corpora, evaluation benchmark, and leaderboard are available at https://mceval.github.io/.
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct leads with 59.6%
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
GPT-4o leads with 65.2% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
GPT-4o leads with 65.2%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 GPT-4o May 2024 65.2%
- 2
Qwen1.5-72B 35.8%
- 3
phi-3-medium 14B 35.2%
- 4
Code Llama 34B Instruct 29.1%
Source: Official McEval leaderboard
- 1 GPT-4o May 2024 65.2%
- 2
Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 59.6%
- 3
Qwen1.5-72B 35.8%
- 4
phi-3-medium 14B 35.2%
- 5
Code Llama 34B Instruct 29.1%
Sources: Official McEval leaderboard and labs’ model cards
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 59.6% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 65.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 35.8% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 35.2% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 29.1% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 65.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 59.6% | Jun 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | | 35.8% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 35.2% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | | 29.1% | Aug 2023 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 22 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time Number one over time Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official McEval leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official McEval leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs report it only in system cards
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | | 59.6 | McEval, fast-thinking only (Table 4) | Capabilities |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471