Benchmark Almanac

McEval

GPT-4o May 2024 65.2% leads since June 2024
GPT-4o May 2024 65.2% leads since June 2024
Only in system cards

Models complete, explain and generate code in 40 programming languages across about 16,000 test samples. Scored by test execution.

Tencent reports it for Hunyuan-A13B in fast-thinking mode.

Released
June 2024
Kind
Function-level problems
Level
School
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-4o May 2024 #161 on the capability index
Last in a system card
June 2025
Last model added
June 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Code large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable advances in code understanding, completion, and generation tasks. Programming benchmarks, comprised of a selection of code challenges and corresponding test cases, serve as a standard to evaluate the capability of different LLMs in such tasks. However, most existing benchmarks primarily focus on Python and are still restricted to a limited number of languages, where other languages are translated from the Python samples (e.g. MultiPL-E) degrading the data diversity. To further facilitate the research of code LLMs, we propose a massively multilingual code benchmark covering 40 programming languages (McEval) with 16K test samples, which substantially pushes the limits of code LLMs in multilingual scenarios. The benchmark contains challenging code completion, understanding, and generation evaluation tasks with finely curated massively multilingual instruction corpora McEval-Instruct. In addition, we introduce an effective multilingual coder mCoder trained on McEval-Instruct to support multilingual programming language generation. Extensive experimental results on McEval show that there is still a difficult journey between open-source models and closed-source LLMs (e.g. GPT-series models) in numerous languages. The instruction corpora, evaluation benchmark, and leaderboard are available at https://mceval.github.io/.

Abstract of McEval: Massively Multilingual Code Evaluation (arXiv:2406.07436, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct leads with 59.6%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

GPT-4o leads with 65.2% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

GPT-4o leads with 65.2%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 59.6%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 59.6% Jun 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o May 2024 65.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen1.5-72B 35.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
3 phi-3-medium 14B 35.2% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Code Llama 34B Instruct 29.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4o May 2024 65.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct 59.6% Jun 2025 Lab model card
3 Qwen1.5-72B 35.8% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
4 phi-3-medium 14B 35.2% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Code Llama 34B Instruct 29.1% Aug 2023 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 22 entries, 4 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time Number one over time Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2024
GPT-4o 65.2%

Source: Official McEval leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4o Qwen1.5-72B Code Llama 34B Instruct 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-4o Qwen1.5-72B

Sources: Official McEval leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 26, 2025 Hunyuan-A13B-Instruct technical report 59.6 McEval, fast-thinking only (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471