Benchmark Almanac

miniCTX-v2

Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 36.2% leads since June 2025
Seed-Prover 81.8% leads since July 2025
Dropped

Provers prove Lean theorems from real projects using long repository context, with theorems taken after a November 28, 2024 cutoff.

An update of miniCTX (2024) with new theorems, so scores are not comparable with v1. The month is the creation date of the Hugging Face dataset.

Released
March 2025
Kind
Formal proofs
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Written proof
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
o4-mini #94 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
July 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Real-world formal theorem proving often depends on a wealth of context, including definitions, lemmas, comments, file structure, and other information. We introduce miniCTX, which tests a model's ability to prove formal mathematical theorems that depend on new context that is not seen during training. miniCTX contains theorems sourced from real Lean projects and textbooks, each associated with a context that can span tens of thousands of tokens. Models are tasked with proving a theorem given access to code from the theorem's repository, which contains context that is needed for the proof. As a baseline for miniCTX, we tested fine-tuning and prompting methods that condition theorem proving on preceding context. Both approaches substantially outperform traditional methods that rely solely on state information. We found that this ability to use context is not captured by previous benchmarks such as miniF2F. Alongside miniCTX, we offer ntp-toolkit for automatically extracting and annotating theorem proving data, making it easy to add new projects into miniCTX to ensure that contexts are not seen during training. miniCTX offers a challenging and realistic evaluation of neural theorem provers.

Abstract of miniCTX: Neural Theorem Proving with (Long-)Contexts (arXiv:2408.03350, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Seed-Prover leads with 81.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 36.2% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Seed-Prover leads with 81.8%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 Seed-Prover 81.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed-Prover 81.8% Jul 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 36.2% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-4o Nov 2024 27.8% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 26.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 o4-mini 24.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed-Prover 81.8% Jul 2025 Lab model card
2 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 36.2% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-4o Nov 2024 27.8% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 26.6% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
5 o4-mini 24.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 4 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in March 2025 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in March 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI Google DeepMind
Own leaderboard Not tested since Sep 2025

Source: Official miniCTX-v2 leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed-Prover Gemini 2.5 Pro GPT-4o 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed-Prover Gemini 2.5 Pro

Sources: Official miniCTX-v2 leaderboard and labs’ model cards

No launch post has listed it since July 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jul 31, 2025 Seed-Prover 81.8 MiniCTX-v2 (Light)

More in Math

All 113 in Math
  • AIME 2026 In use Models solve the 30 integer-answer problems from the 2026 AIME I and II math competitions. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 100%
  • IMO-AnswerBench In use 400 olympiad problems with short verifiable answers, robustified against memorization. Scored by answer match. GLM-5.2 91%
  • HMMT 2026 In use Models solve the 33 final-answer problems from the February 2026 Harvard-MIT Mathematics Tournament. Scored by exact answer match. GPT-5.5 98.5%
  • PolyMath In use Models solve 9,000 parallel math problems in 18 languages across four difficulty levels, from school math to frontier math. Final answers are checked. Qwen3.7-Max 86.5%
  • MathArena (Apex, IMO, USAMO) In use Evaluates models on newly released math competitions after release. Final-answer or human/LLM-judged proof scores. Claude Opus 4.8 81.3%
  • MathArena Apex Shortlist In use Models solve 47 hard final-answer problems that MathArena selected from 2025 competitions, where the best models scored about 50% at selection. Scored by accuracy over repeated attempts. GPT-5.5 98.4%