Benchmark Almanac

MirrorCode

Claude Sonnet 5.5 97.8% leads since September 2026
Not in model cards

Agent rebuilds a whole CLI program from scratch using only the original binary as an oracle. Solved only if 100% of end-to-end tests pass.

25 targets, 3 kept private. ~34% of tests held out. Source programs are open source, so memorization cannot be fully ruled out.

Made by
Epoch AI + METR
Released
June 2026
Kind
Building whole projects
Level
Research frontier
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI models are rapidly improving at autonomous coding, as shown by benchmark progress and one-off demonstrations such as AI implementing a C compiler. However, existing coding benchmarks tend to focus on shorter tasks, and one-off demonstrations are hard to compare systematically because they often have some human guidance, and are not standardized or repeated across models. To address these challenges, we introduce MirrorCode, a long-horizon coding benchmark based on reimplementing entire software projects. In MirrorCode, AI agents must replicate the functionalities of an existing program, without access to its source code. AI solutions must match the original program's output exactly on end-to-end tests, including held-out tests. MirrorCode's 25 target programs span different areas of computing: Unix utilities, data serialization and query tools, bioinformatics, interpreters, static analysis, cryptography, and compression. Existing AI models can already reimplement complex software, with the strongest model scoring 56% across the benchmark. For example, AI can reimplement gotree, a 16,000-line bioinformatics toolkit - a task that we believe would take weeks for a human engineer. However, studying the frontier of performance requires a larger inference budget than typical benchmarks, for example, $2,600 over 19 days for a single attempt on a large task. We show that AI agents can already complete long-horizon software engineering tasks, especially when requirements are precisely specified. More broadly, our work suggests AI will have transformative effects on software engineering, as autonomous agents continue to improve.

Abstract of MirrorCode: AI can rebuild entire programs from behavior alone (arXiv:2606.30182, CC0)
39
Models scored in Epoch AI’s runs

Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads with 97.8%

Best score per model from Epoch AI’s own runs. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max 97.8%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 max 95.6%
  3. 3 Claude Fable 5.1 max 93.3%
  4. 4 Claude Opus 5 max 87.8%
  5. 5 Claude Haiku 5.5 max 78.9%
  6. 6 GPT-6.1 Terra max 76.7%
  7. 7 Claude Fable 5 max 70%
  8. 8 Claude Opus 4.8 max 65.6%
  9. 9 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash max 64.4%
  10. 10 Claude Sonnet 5 max 63.3%
  11. 11 GPT-6.1 Sol max 61.1%
  12. 12 GPT-6 Astra max 60%
  13. 13 Gemini 4 Argon high 58.9%
  14. 14 Kimi K3 max 54.4%
  15. 15 Muse Spark 1.3 max 54.4%
  16. 16 Grok 4.7 xhigh 54.4%
  17. 17 Qwen 3.8 Max xhigh 52.2%
  18. 18 GPT-6 Sol max 48.9%
  19. 19 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) xhigh 47.8%
  20. 20 Muse Wonder max 45.6%
  21. 21 GPT-5.6 Terra max 41.1%
  22. 22 Grok 4.6 xhigh 41.1%
  23. 23 Gemini 3.7 Flash high 41.1%
  24. 24 Gemini 3.8 Flash high 38.9%
  25. 25 GLM-5.2 max 36.7%
  26. 26 Claude Opus 4.6 max 33.3%
  27. 27 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 max 33.3%
  28. 28 GPT-5.2 xhigh 32.2%
  29. 29 Grok 4.5 high 32.2%
  30. 30 Claude Opus 4.7 high 31.1%
  31. 31 Mistral Large 4 Preview high 27.8%
  32. 32 GPT-6 Luna max 26.7%
  33. 33 GPT-5.4 xhigh 23.3%
  34. 34 GPT-5.5 xhigh 23.3%
  35. 35 Gemini 3.6 Flash high 23.3%
  36. 36 GPT-5.6 Luna max 21.1%
  37. 37 GPT-5.6 Sol high 20%
  38. 38 Gemini 3.1 Pro high 8.89%
  39. 39 GPT-5 high 4.44%

Source: Epoch AI runs (CC BY 4.0)

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Sonnet 5.5 97.8% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
2 Claude Opus 5.5 95.6% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
3 Claude Fable 5.1 93.3% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
4 Claude Opus 5 87.8% max Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
5 Claude Haiku 5.5 78.9% max Oct 2026 Epoch AI run
6 GPT-6.1 Terra 76.7% max Oct 2026 Epoch AI run
7 Claude Fable 5 70% max Jun 2026 Epoch AI run
8 Claude Opus 4.8 65.6% max May 2026 Epoch AI run
9 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 64.4% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
10 Claude Sonnet 5 63.3% max Jun 2026 Epoch AI run
11 GPT-6.1 Sol 61.1% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
12 GPT-6 Astra 60% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
13 Gemini 4 Argon 58.9% high Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
14 Kimi K3 54.4% max Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
15 Muse Spark 1.3 54.4% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
16 Grok 4.7 54.4% xhigh Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
17 Qwen 3.8 Max 52.2% xhigh Aug 2026 Epoch AI run
18 GPT-6 Sol 48.9% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
19 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 47.8% xhigh Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
20 Muse Wonder 45.6% max Oct 2026 Epoch AI run
21 GPT-5.6 Terra 41.1% max Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
22 Grok 4.6 41.1% xhigh Aug 2026 Epoch AI run
23 Gemini 3.7 Flash 41.1% high Aug 2026 Epoch AI run
24 Gemini 3.8 Flash 38.9% high Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
25 GLM-5.2 36.7% max Jun 2026 Epoch AI run
26 Claude Opus 4.6 33.3% max Feb 2026 Epoch AI run
27 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 33.3% max Aug 2026 Epoch AI run
28 GPT-5.2 32.2% xhigh Dec 2025 Epoch AI run
29 Grok 4.5 32.2% high Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
30 Claude Opus 4.7 31.1% high Apr 2026 Epoch AI run
31 Mistral Large 4 Preview 27.8% high Oct 2026 Epoch AI run
32 GPT-6 Luna 26.7% max Sep 2026 Epoch AI run
33 GPT-5.4 23.3% xhigh Mar 2026 Epoch AI run
34 GPT-5.5 23.3% xhigh Apr 2026 Epoch AI run
35 Gemini 3.6 Flash 23.3% high Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
36 GPT-5.6 Luna 21.1% max Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
37 GPT-5.6 Sol 20% high Jul 2026 Epoch AI run
38 Gemini 3.1 Pro 8.89% high Feb 2026 Epoch AI run
39 GPT-5 4.44% high Aug 2025 Epoch AI run

6 models have held number one in Epoch AI’s runs since its release in June 2026

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Epoch AI runs Passed 85% in Jul 2026, by Claude Opus 5

Source: Epoch AI runs (CC BY 4.0)

Epoch AI’s run of Claude Opus 5 passed 85% in July 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Run by Epoch AI Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Opus 5 Claude Fable 5 Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.6 GPT-5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Opus 5

Source: Epoch AI runs (CC BY 4.0)

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471