Benchmark Almanac

Multi-factual (Anthropic)

Only in system cards

Models answer questions that each combine several closed-ended sub-questions on one topic. Answers are graded correct, incorrect or unsure against references.

In-house Anthropic factuality evaluation. Questions were built from article quotes and checked by hand. Score is the share answered correctly.

Made by
Anthropic
Released
March 2024
Kind
Long-form factuality
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude 3 Opus #172 on the capability index
Last in a system card
March 2024
Last model added
March 2024
1
Model scored in lab cards
3
System cards report it, from 1 lab

Claude 3 Opus leads with 62.8%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Claude 3 Opus 62.8%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3 Opus 62.8% Mar 2024 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude 3 Opus

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

3 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Sonnet model card Multi-factual, correct, incorrect and unsure shares, chart without printed values (Figure 11) Hallucination
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Opus model card 62.8 Multi-factual, % correct ("over 62.8%"), stated in text. Incorrect and unsure shares in a chart without printed values (5.7, Figure 11) Hallucination
Mar 4, 2024 Claude 3 Haiku model card Multi-factual, correct, incorrect and unsure shares, chart without printed values (Figure 11) Hallucination

More in Factuality

All 74 in Factuality
  • SimpleVQA In use Models answer 2,025 short factual questions about images across 9 tasks and 9 topics. An LLM judge grades answers against fixed references. Qwen3.7-Plus 81.7%
  • HallusionBench In use Models answer 1,129 yes or no questions about 346 images, built in pairs to expose language hallucination and visual illusion. Scored by accuracy. Keye-VL-2.0-30B-A3B 73.5%
  • SimpleQA Verified In use 1,000 human-verified, de-duplicated short-answer factual questions measuring parametric knowledge. Gemini 3.1 Pro 77.5%
  • Kimi Hallu Bench In use Models answer hard prompts drawn from practical work tasks. Fact-checking agents score the share of claims that are hallucinated. GPT-6 Astra 4.20%
  • Internal adversarially-designed factuality evaluations In use Models answer adversarial questions in nine categories such as history, math and code. Scored on agreement with human ideal responses. GPT-6 Luna 7.60%
  • AA-Omniscience v1.1 In use Models answer 3,000 knowledge questions in six domains without tools and may abstain. The index adds correct answers and subtracts wrong ones. Inkling 2 Small 16.1