Multi-LCB
Models solve LiveCodeBench-style contest problems in twelve programming languages, with dated problems for contamination-aware evaluation.
Extends LiveCodeBench beyond Python. 60 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Made by
- Multi-LCB team
- Released
- June 2026
- Kind
- Competitive programming
- Level
- Competition
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 #123 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
LiveCodeBench (LCB) has recently become a widely adopted benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on code-generation tasks. By curating competitive programming problems, constantly adding fresh problems to the set, and filtering them by release dates, LCB provides contamination-aware evaluation and offers a holistic view of coding capability. However, LCB remains restricted to Python, leaving open the question of whether LLMs can generalize across the diverse programming languages required in real-world software engineering. We introduce Multi-LCB, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs across twelve programming languages, including Python. Multi-LCB transforms Python tasks from the LCB dataset into equivalent tasks in other languages while preserving LCB's contamination controls and evaluation protocol. Because it is fully compatible with the original LCB format, Multi-LCB will automatically track future LCB updates, enabling systematic assessment of cross-language code generation competence and requiring models to sustain performance well beyond Python. We evaluated 24 LLMs for instruction and reasoning on Multi-LCB, uncovering evidence of Python overfitting, language-specific contamination, and substantial disparities in multilingual performance. Our results establish Multi-LCB as a rigorous new benchmark for multi-programming-language code evaluation, directly addressing LCB's primary limitation and exposing critical gaps in current LLM capabilities.
gpt-oss-120b leads with 67.8% among models released by August 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 67.8 gpt-oss-120b
- 64.0 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thk-2507
- 63.1
DeepSeek-R1
- 59.8 gpt-oss-20b
- 53.2 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thk-2507
- 48.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B
- 48.6
Qwen3-32B
- 45.5
Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 42.4
Qwen3-14B
- 37.5 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instr-2507
- 33.9
Qwen3-8B
- 31.4 Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instr
- 31.1 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instr-2507
- 25.0 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instr
- 23.0 Seed-Coder-8B-Instr
- 22.7 OpenRsn-Nmt-32B
- 22.0
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B
- 21.3
Devstral Small 1.0
- 20.9 Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instr
- 19.8 OpenCodeRsn-Nmt-1.1-32B
- 16.8
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B
- 13.3 Deepseek-Coder-33B-Instr
- 1 gpt-oss-120b medium 67.8%
- 2 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thk-2507 64%
- 3
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 63.1%
- 4 gpt-oss-20b medium 59.8%
- 5 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thk-2507 53.2%
- 6
Qwen3-235B-A22B 48.9%
- 7
Qwen3-32B 48.6%
- 8
Qwen3-30B-A3B 45.5%
- 9
Qwen3-14B 42.4%
- 10 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instr-2507 37.5%
- 11
Qwen3-8B 33.9%
- 12 Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instr 31.4%
- 13 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instr-2507 31.1%
- 14 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instr 25%
- 15 Seed-Coder-8B-Instr 23%
- 16 OpenRsn-Nmt-32B 22.7%
- 17
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B 22%
- 18
Devstral Small 1.0 21.3%
- 19 Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instr 20.9%
- 20 OpenCodeRsn-Nmt-1.1-32B 19.8%
- 21
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B 16.8%
- 22 Deepseek-Coder-33B-Instr 13.3%
Source: Official Multi-LCB leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | gpt-oss-120b | 67.8% | medium | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thk-2507 | 64% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 3 | | 63.1% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | gpt-oss-20b | 59.8% | medium | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thk-2507 | 53.2% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | | 48.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 48.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 45.5% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 42.4% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instr-2507 | 37.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | | 33.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instr | 31.4% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instr-2507 | 31.1% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 14 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instr | 25% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 15 | Seed-Coder-8B-Instr | 23% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 16 | OpenRsn-Nmt-32B | 22.7% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | | 22% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 21.3% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Qwen2.5-Coder-14B-Instr | 20.9% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 20 | OpenCodeRsn-Nmt-1.1-32B | 19.8% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 21 | | 16.8% | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Deepseek-Coder-33B-Instr | 13.3% | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Multi-LCB leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Multi-LCB leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471