Benchmark Almanac

NanoGPT-Bench

Claude Opus 4.6 9.30% leads since May 2026
Not in model cards

Coding agents with a fixed H100-hour budget and no internet try to improve on a strong NanoGPT speedrun starting point. The score is the share of later human progress recovered.

At launch the best agent recovered 9.3% of five months of human record progress. Different from the community NanoGPT Speedrun record.

Made by
Intology
Released
May 2026
Kind
AI research tasks
Level
Research frontier
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
2
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 9.30%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.6 max 9.30%
  2. 2 GPT-5.4 xhigh 8.60%

Source: Official NanoGPT-Bench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.6 9.30% max, Autoresearch Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.4 8.60% xhigh, Codex Mar 2026 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since May 2026

Source: Official NanoGPT-Bench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.6 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Opus 4.6

Source: Official NanoGPT-Bench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in AI research

All 104 in AI research
  • PaperBench In use Agent replicates ICML 2024 papers from scratch. LLM judge grades against author-written hierarchical rubrics. Qwen 3.8 Max 93%
  • MLS-Bench In use Agent must invent one algorithmic change in an ML research scaffold whose gain transfers across settings. Scored relative to human baselines. Claude Fable 5.1 50.3%
  • PostTrainBench 1.2 In use CLI agent gets a base model, one H100 and a time budget to post-train it for a target benchmark. Scored on normalized gain. Claude Fable 5.1 44.6%
  • MLE-bench In use Kaggle-style ML engineering competitions. Agent trains models and is scored against competition leaderboards. GPT-6 Astra 93.8%
  • KernelBench In use Replace PyTorch operators with faster custom GPU kernels. Scored on correctness and speedup. MiniMax-M3 28.8%
  • PMPP-Hard In use Agents write GPU kernels for 69 tasks that must be correct, and on 48 of them also run within 1.25 times the reference time. The score is the area under the solved-tasks curve over a 10-hour budget, out of 690 task-hours. Inkling 2 Small 494.3