OIBench
Models write programs for 250 original olympiad in informatics problems. Hidden tests check correctness, and time and space completion curves compare efficiency with reference solutions.
The paper compares models with human contest participants. LongCat launch posts report the English split as OIBench EN.
- Made by
- AGI-Eval (Meituan)
- Released
- June 2025
- Kind
- Competitive programming
- Level
- Competition
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Code
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- o4-mini #94 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- January 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- January 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
As models become increasingly sophisticated, conventional algorithm benchmarks are increasingly saturated, underscoring the need for more challenging benchmarks to guide future improvements in algorithmic reasoning. This paper introduces OIBench, a high-quality, private, and challenging olympiad-level informatics dataset comprising 250 carefully curated original problems. We detail the construction methodology of the benchmark, ensuring a comprehensive assessment across various programming paradigms and complexities, and we demonstrate its contamination-resistant properties via experiments. We propose Time/Space Completion Curves for finer-grained efficiency analysis and enable direct human-model comparisons through high-level participant evaluations. Our experiments reveal that while open-source models lag behind closed-source counterparts, current SOTA models already outperform most human participants in both correctness and efficiency, while still being suboptimal compared to the canonical solutions. By releasing OIBench as a fully open-source resource (https://huggingface.co/datasets/AGI-Eval/OIBench), we hope this benchmark will contribute to advancing code reasoning capabilities for future LLMs.
o4-mini leads with 36.4% among models released by April 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 leads with 47.7%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in April 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 36.4 o4-mini
- 26.8 o3-mini
- 20.5 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified)
- 18.9
Qwen3-32B
- 15.4 o1
- 11.6
DeepSeek-V3
- 10.7
QwQ-32B
- 4.10 DeepSeek-V3-1226
- 3.45 Claude3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified)
- 2.85 DeepSeek-V3-base
- 2.65 GPT-4O (snapshot unspecified)
- 2.30 Doubao-32k-pro
- 1.90
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
- 1.80
Qwen2.5-72B
- 1.15
Llama 3.1-405B
- 0.95 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Base
- 0.75 Llama-3.1-405B-base
- 0.75 Qwen2.5-72B-base
- 1 o4-mini high 36.4%
- 2 o3-mini high 26.8%
- 3 DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) 20.5%
- 4
Qwen3-32B 18.9%
- 5 o1 15.4%
- 6
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 11.6%
- 7
QwQ-32B 10.7%
- 8 DeepSeek-V3-1226 4.10%
- 9 Claude3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) 3.45%
- 10 DeepSeek-V3-base 2.85%
- 11 GPT-4O (snapshot unspecified) 2.65%
- 12 Doubao-32k-pro 2.30%
- 13
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 1.90%
- 14
Qwen2.5-72B 1.80%
- 15
Llama 3.1-405B 1.15%
- 16 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Base 0.95%
- 17 Llama-3.1-405B-base 0.75%
- 18 Qwen2.5-72B-base 0.75%
Source: Official OIBench leaderboard
- 1
LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 47.7%
- 2 o4-mini high 36.4%
- 3 o3-mini high 26.8%
- 4
Qwen3-32B 18.9%
- 5 o1 15.4%
- 6
DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 11.6%
- 7
QwQ-32B 10.7%
- 8
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B 1.90%
- 9
Qwen2.5-72B 1.80%
- 10
Llama 3.1-405B 1.15%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official OIBench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | o4-mini | 36.4% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | o3-mini | 26.8% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | DeepSeek-R1 (snapshot unspecified) | 20.5% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | | 18.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o1 | 15.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 11.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 10.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | DeepSeek-V3-1226 | 4.10% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 9 | Claude3.5 Sonnet (snapshot unspecified) | 3.45% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | DeepSeek-V3-base | 2.85% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | GPT-4O (snapshot unspecified) | 2.65% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 12 | Doubao-32k-pro | 2.30% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 13 | | 1.90% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 1.80% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | | 1.15% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Base | 0.95% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 17 | Llama-3.1-405B-base | 0.75% | Official leaderboard | ||
| 18 | Qwen2.5-72B-base | 0.75% | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 47.7% | Jan 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | o4-mini | 36.4% | high | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | o3-mini | 26.8% | high | Jan 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | | 18.9% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | o1 | 15.4% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 11.6% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | | 10.7% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | | 1.90% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | | 1.80% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 1.15% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official OIBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official OIBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in January 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | 47.7 | OIBench EN (Pass@1) |
One system card reports it
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | | 47.7 | OIBench EN (Pass@1) (Table 2) | Capabilities |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
- SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
- Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471