QwenBlenderBench
Qwen 3.8 Max 69.9% leads since August 2026 Models complete Blender 3D modeling tasks in Qwen's internal visual agent and coding test. Qwen has not described its scoring.
This is an in-house evaluation, and Qwen has not released the tasks.
- Made by
- Qwen Team, Alibaba Group
- Released
- August 2026
- Kind
- Web and app front ends
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- Kept private
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 69.9% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon - GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 1 Qwen 3.8 Max 69.9%
- 2 Claude Fable 5 69.5%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 68.6%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.8 62.4%
- 5 Qwen3.7-Plus 41.5%
- 6 Gemini 3.1 Pro 23%
Source: Official QwenBlenderBench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qwen 3.8 Max | 69.9% | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5 | 69.5% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 68.6% | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 62.4% | May 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | Qwen3.7-Plus | 41.5% | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | 23% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official QwenBlenderBench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official QwenBlenderBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2026 | Qwen 3.8 Max | 69.9 | QwenBlenderBench |
One lab claim next to the leaderboard
Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. 1 of them match, which usually means one side copied the other. Every benchmark.
| Model | Lab says | Board says | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 3.8 Max | 69.9% QwenBlenderBench | 69.9% Leaderboard | Same |
More in Coding
- SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
- LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5% - SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
- DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
- SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases.
Seed2.1 Pro 59.8% - Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471