Benchmark Almanac

QwenReactBench

Claude Fable 5 1,770 leads since June 2026
In use

Model builds bilingual React projects in Claude Code across 7 categories. Rendered outputs judged by a multimodal model, ranked with Bradley-Terry Elo.

Lab-created in-house eval (Alibaba Qwen).

Made by
Alibaba Qwen
Kind
Web and app front ends
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
Claude Fable 5 #11 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
5
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Claude Fable 5 leads with 1,770 among models released by August 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

Bars start at 1,500.

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5 1,770
  2. 2 Qwen 3.8 Max 1,724
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.8 1,694
  4. 4 GPT-5.6 Sol max 1,564
  5. 5 Qwen3.7-Max 1,538

Source: Official QwenReactBench leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Fable 5 1,770 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen 3.8 Max 1,724 Aug 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.8 1,694 May 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.6 Sol 1,564 max Jul 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Qwen3.7-Max 1,538 May 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since 2023

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Qwen Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Aug 2026

Source: Official QwenReactBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 2026 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 2026

Sources: Official QwenReactBench leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 1724 QwenReactBench

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen 3.8 Max 1,724 QwenReactBench 1,724 Leaderboard Same

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471