Benchmark Almanac

QwenVision2Code

GPT-5.4 1,884 leads since May 2026
In use

Models turn images, videos and design references into executable code. Qwen reports ratings near 1,500 to 1,900, not percentages.

In-house. The Qwen3.7-Plus post does not explain the tasks or the rating method.

Released
May 2026
Kind
Web and app front ends
Level
University
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Kept private
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.4 #27 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
June 2026
Last model added
June 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026
5
Models scored on its own leaderboard
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.4 leads with 1,884 among models released by June 2026

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

The newest model with a score here came out in June 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

Bars start at 1,500.

  1. 1 GPT-5.4 xhigh 1,884
  2. 2 Qwen3.7-Plus 1,772
  3. 3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 1,632
  4. 4 Qwen 3.6 Plus 1,522
  5. 5 Claude Opus 4.6 max 1,518

Source: Official QwenVision2Code leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.4 1,884 xhigh Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3.7-Plus 1,772 Jun 2026 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro 1,632 Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 Qwen 3.6 Plus 1,522 Mar 2026 Official leaderboard
5 Claude Opus 4.6 1,518 max Feb 2026 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. We plot every source in the charts below.

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jun 2026
GPT-5.4 1,884

Source: Official QwenVision2Code leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card
1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2026 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2026

Sources: Official QwenVision2Code leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 1772 QwenVision2Code

One lab claim next to the leaderboard

Each score a lab reported for its own model, beside the same model's best score on the leaderboard. Gaps mostly come from different harnesses, effort levels and task subsets. Every benchmark.

Model Lab says Board says Gap
Qwen3.7-Plus 1,772 QwenVision2Code 1,772 Leaderboard Same

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471