Benchmark Almanac

SPI (security patch identification)

Only in system cards

Models decide whether code commits from open-source projects are security patches.

Dataset from SPI: Automated Identification of Security Patches via Commits, ACM TOSEM 2021. Google reports accuracy.

Made by
Zhou et al.
Released
January 2021
Kind
Finding and exploiting real bugs
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Multiple choice
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemma 2 27B #189 on the capability index
Last in a system card
July 2024
Last model added
July 2024
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemma 2 27B leads with 53%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 Gemma 2 27B 53%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemma 2 27B 53% Jul 2024 Lab model card

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 2 27B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Gemma 2 27B

Source: Labs’ model cards

Labs report it only in system cards

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark. Some system cards do, below.

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jul 31, 2024 Gemma 2 27B technical report 53 SPI, accuracy (Table 20) Cyber risk

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%