Benchmark Almanac

SWE-bench-Live Verified

Not in model cards

Task success on the official Verified split. The source reports each submission denominator separately. Other language and platform splits remain separate.

Task success on the official Verified split. The source reports each submission denominator separately. Other language and platform splits remain separate.

Made by
Microsoft
Released
May 2025
Kind
Fixing real repositories
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last model added
September 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

The issue-resolving task, where a model generates patches to fix real-world bugs, has emerged as a critical benchmark for evaluating the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While SWE-bench and its variants have become standard in this domain, they suffer from key limitations: they have not been updated since their initial releases, cover a narrow set of repositories, and depend heavily on manual effort for instance construction and environment setup. These factors hinder scalability and introduce risks of overfitting and data contamination. In this work, we present SWE-bench-Live, a live-updatable benchmark designed to overcome these challenges. Our initial release consists of 1,319 tasks derived from real GitHub issues created since 2024, spanning 93 repositories. Each task is accompanied by a dedicated Docker image to ensure reproducible execution. Central to our benchmark is \method, an automated curation pipeline that streamlines the entire process from instance creation to environment setup, removing manual bottlenecks and enabling scalability and continuous updates. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art agent frameworks and LLMs on SWE-bench-Live, revealing a substantial performance gap compared to static benchmarks like SWE-bench, even under controlled evaluation conditions. To better understand this discrepancy, we perform detailed analyses across repository origin, issue recency, and task difficulty. By providing a fresh, diverse, and executable benchmark grounded in live repository activity, SWE-bench-Live facilitates rigorous, contamination-resistant evaluation of LLMs and agents in dynamic, real-world software development settings.

Abstract of SWE-bench Goes Live! (arXiv:2505.23419, CC0)
2
Models scored on its own leaderboard

Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 40%

Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best.

  1. 1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 40%
  2. 2 GPT-5 medium 30.4%

Source: Official SWE-bench-Live Verified leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 40% SWE-agent Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 30.4% medium, SWE-agent Aug 2025 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 4.5 GPT-5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Near the ceiling (85%) Claude Sonnet 4.5 GPT-5

Source: Official SWE-bench-Live Verified leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471