Benchmark Almanac

SWE-Perf

Claude 3.7 Sonnet 2.26% leads since July 2025
MiniMax-M2.1 3.10% leads since December 2025
Fading

Agents speed up code in 140 tasks drawn from performance pull requests in real GitHub repos. Scored on correctness and runtime gain.

Released
July 2025
Kind
Speed and optimization
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Claude 3.7 Sonnet #118 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
December 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Code performance optimization is paramount in real-world software engineering and critical for production-level systems. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in code generation and bug fixing, their proficiency in enhancing code performance at the repository level remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce SWE-Perf, the first benchmark specifically designed to systematically evaluate LLMs on code performance optimization tasks within authentic repository contexts. SWE-Perf comprises 140 carefully curated instances, each derived from performance-improving pull requests from popular GitHub repositories. Each benchmark instance includes the relevant codebase, target functions, performance-related tests, expert-authored patches, and executable environments. Through a comprehensive evaluation of representative methods that span file-level and repo-level approaches (e.g., Agentless and OpenHands), we reveal a substantial capability gap between existing LLMs and expert-level optimization performance, highlighting critical research opportunities in this emerging field.

Abstract of SWE-Perf: Can Language Models Optimize Code Performance on Real-World Repositories? (arXiv:2507.12415, CC0)
1
Model scored in lab cards
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

MiniMax-M2.1 leads with 3.10%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads with 2.26% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

MiniMax-M2.1 leads with 3.10%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

  1. 1 MiniMax-M2.1 3.10%

Source: Labs’ model cards

Source: Official SWE-Perf leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official SWE-Perf leaderboard

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M2.1 3.10% Dec 2025 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 2.26% Realistic, OpenHands Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Qwen3-235B-A22B 0.68% Oracle Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MiniMax-M2.1 3.10% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 2.26% Realistic, OpenHands Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Qwen3-235B-A22B 0.68% Oracle Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 11 entries, 2 of them models we track. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Number one over time Number one over time 2 models have held number one with claims included since its release in July 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Anthropic
Own leaderboard Not tested since Jul 2025

Source: Official SWE-Perf leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MiniMax-M2.1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Sources: Official SWE-Perf leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

MiniMax
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 23, 2025 MiniMax-M2.1 3.1 SWE-Perf

More in Coding

All 282 in Coding
  • SWE-bench Verified In use 500 human-validated GitHub issues from 12 Python repos. Agent writes a patch that must pass hidden tests. Claude Opus 4.7 83.5%
  • LiveCodeBench v6 In use Competitive programming problems collected after model cutoffs from LeetCode, AtCoder, Codeforces. Scored pass@1 on hidden tests. DeepSeek-V4-Pro 93.5%
  • SWE-bench Multilingual In use 300 GitHub-issue tasks across nine programming languages in SWE-bench format. Patch graded by repository tests. Claude Fable 5.2 96.6%
  • DeepSWE In use 113 original long-horizon engineering tasks across 91 repos and five languages, written from scratch. Hand-written verifiers accept alternative solutions. GPT-6 Astra 74.1%
  • SciCode In use Scientist-curated research coding problems split into subproblems across natural sciences. Code checked against test cases. Seed2.1 Pro 59.8%
  • Codeforces rating In use Model solves recent Codeforces contest problems. An Elo-style rating is computed from simulated contest performance. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 3,471