Benchmark Almanac

ToolSandbox

LFM2.5-24B-A2B 80.7% leads since October 2026
In use

Models use stateful tools in multi-turn conversations with a simulated user. Tools have hidden state dependencies, and runs are scored against milestones.

The repo moved to the apple-aiml-research organization on GitHub.

Made by
Apple
Released
August 2024
Kind
General assistants
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent large language models (LLMs) advancements sparked a growing research interest in tool assisted LLMs solving real-world challenges, which calls for comprehensive evaluation of tool-use capabilities. While previous works focused on either evaluating over stateless web services (RESTful API), based on a single turn user prompt, or an off-policy dialog trajectory, ToolSandbox includes stateful tool execution, implicit state dependencies between tools, a built-in user simulator supporting on-policy conversational evaluation and a dynamic evaluation strategy for intermediate and final milestones over an arbitrary trajectory. We show that open source and proprietary models have a significant performance gap, and complex tasks like State Dependency, Canonicalization and Insufficient Information defined in ToolSandbox are challenging even the most capable SOTA LLMs, providing brand-new insights into tool-use LLM capabilities. ToolSandbox evaluation framework is released at https://github.com/apple/ToolSandbox

Abstract of ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilities (arXiv:2408.04682, CC0)
5
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

LFM2.5-24B-A2B leads with 80.7%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

  1. 1 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 80.7%
  2. 2 LFM3-1.7B 80.4%
  3. 3 LFM2.5-2.6B 77.8%
  4. 4 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 74.1%
  5. 5 LFM2.5-VL-3B 59.5%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 80.7% Oct 2026 Lab model card
2 LFM3-1.7B 80.4% Oct 2026 Lab model card
3 LFM2.5-2.6B 77.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
4 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 74.1% Oct 2026 Lab model card
5 LFM2.5-VL-3B 59.5% Aug 2026 Lab model card

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in August 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Liquid AI
Lab claims 2 leaders

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) LFM2.5-24B-A2B LFM2.5-2.6B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) LFM2.5-24B-A2B

Source: Labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Liquid AI
NVIDIA
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 27, 2026 LFM3-1.7B 80.4 ToolSandbox
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 74.1 ToolSandbox
Oct 13, 2026 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 80.7 ToolSandbox
Aug 12, 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 59.5 ToolSandbox
Aug 4, 2026 LFM2.5-2.6B 77.8 ToolSandbox

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 74.1 ToolSandbox, released Q4_K_M imatrix checkpoint (Table 5). BF16 68.77 (Table 3) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%