TraceTrial-Bench
Agent harnesses, not only models, are tested on reliability across seven components, with traces used to attribute each failure to its cause.
203 upvotes on Hugging Face papers.
- Made by
- TraceLite AI
- Released
- October 2026
- Kind
- General assistants
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 5 #10 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
LLM agents are increasingly used to solve real-world problems, and their effectiveness depends on both the underlying models and the harnesses that support their operation. However, most existing benchmarks focus on model capabilities and overall agent performance, with limited attention to the evaluation of agent harnesses. To address this gap, we introduce TraceTrial-Bench, which organizes harness reliability into seven components covering context, execution, governance, lifecycle, observability, tools, and verification. We construct 95 expert-level, mechanism-oriented tasks with executable or state-based ground truth to support semantically equivalent comparisons while preserving the native behavior of each harness. We design a Trajectory Tracing (TT) module to capture agent execution traces and introduce a two-layer evaluation framework that separately assesses agent performance and harness reliability. In addition, we design a Multi-source Evidence Acquisition (MEA) module to provide evidence from the agent context, harness, and execution environment for LLM-based evaluation, and develop a Failure Attribution (FA) module that uses explicit mechanism chains to support attribution at the run level. Across 4 harnesses, 9 models, and 95 tasks, our evaluation of 3,420 runs yields macro-averaged harness scores ranging from 59.8% to 72.0%, while 31.1% of runs achieve task success despite failing at least one harness criterion. TraceTrial-Bench provides an auditable and reproducible foundation for comparing agent harnesses, diagnosing their failures, and studying how harness design interacts with model behavior.
Claude Opus 5 leads with 77.6% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 14 more
- 1 Claude Opus 5 77.6%
- 2 Grok 4.6 76.7%
- 3 GPT-5.6 Sol 76.1%
- 4 GLM-5.3 74.6%
- 5
Gemini 3.7 Flash 74.5%
- 6 Kimi K3 74.4%
- 7
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 72%
- 8
Tencent Hy3 71.4%
- 9
Qwen 3.8 Max 70%
Source: Official TraceTrial-Bench leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5 | 77.6% | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Grok 4.6 | 76.7% | Claude Code | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 76.1% | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GLM-5.3 | 74.6% | Claude Code | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 74.5% | OpenClaw | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Kimi K3 | 74.4% | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | | 72% | OpenClaw | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 71.4% | OpenClaw | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | | 70% | OpenClaw | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Cost and overall performance
Costs exclude judge calls and discarded runs. The line joins the runs that no other run beats on both measures. We redrew this chart from the numbers on the official leaderboard.
| Model | Setting | Overall score | Cost per task |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | Claude Code | 77.6% | $0.66 |
| Grok 4.6 | Claude Code | 76.7% | $0.51 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | Claude Code | 76.1% | $0.81 |
| Claude Opus 5 | DeepSeek Harness | 75.4% | $2.07 |
| Claude Opus 5 | OpenClaw | 75% | $2.17 |
| GLM-5.3 | Claude Code | 74.6% | $0.41 |
| | OpenClaw | 74.5% | $0.77 |
| Kimi K3 | Claude Code | 74.4% | $0.61 |
| Kimi K3 | OpenClaw | 73.7% | $0.35 |
| Grok 4.6 | DeepSeek Harness | 73.1% | $0.38 |
| GLM-5.3 | DeepSeek Harness | 73% | $0.23 |
| Kimi K3 | DeepSeek Harness | 72.4% | $0.23 |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 72.3% | $0.42 |
| | OpenClaw | 72% | $0.09 |
| | Claude Code | 71.9% | $0.12 |
| | Claude Code | 71.9% | $0.25 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | DeepSeek Harness | 71.8% | $0.36 |
| | OpenClaw | 71.4% | $0.04 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenClaw | 71.4% | $0.97 |
| | OpenClaw | 70% | $0.29 |
| Grok 4.6 | OpenClaw | 69.9% | $0.82 |
| | Claude Code | 69.3% | $0.04 |
| | Claude Code | 69.3% | $0.52 |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 68.9% | $0.04 |
| GLM-5.3 | OpenClaw | 68.8% | $0.18 |
| | Codex | 67.9% | $0.23 |
| Kimi K3 | Codex | 67.4% | $0.38 |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 67.2% | $0.28 |
| | Codex | 66.5% | $0.26 |
| Grok 4.6 | Codex | 66.2% | $0.46 |
| Claude Opus 5 | Codex | 65.4% | $2.12 |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 65.2% | $0.02 |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | Codex | 64.1% | $1.65 |
| GLM-5.3 | Codex | 63.9% | $0.19 |
| | Codex | 63.8% | $0.05 |
| | Codex | 61.6% | $0.03 |
The best score, 77.6%, costs $0.66 a task
Runs on the cost frontier score higher than any run that's cheaper. GLM-5.3 comes within 4.6 points of the best for $0.23 a task, 3 times cheaper. The costs are the leaderboard's own estimates, so compare them only within this benchmark.
Source: Official TraceTrial-Bench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | Claude Code | 77.6% | $0.66 | 3,700 | |
| Grok 4.6 | Claude Code | 76.7% | $0.51 | 7,200 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | Claude Code | 76.1% | $0.81 | 4,700 | |
| Claude Opus 5 | DeepSeek Harness | 75.4% | $2.07 | 16,900 | |
| Claude Opus 5 | OpenClaw | 75% | $2.17 | 7,700 | |
| GLM-5.3 | Claude Code | 74.6% | $0.41 | 13,900 | |
| | OpenClaw | 74.5% | $0.77 | 10,600 | |
| Kimi K3 | Claude Code | 74.4% | $0.61 | 4,800 | |
| Kimi K3 | OpenClaw | 73.7% | $0.35 | 5,700 | |
| Grok 4.6 | DeepSeek Harness | 73.1% | $0.38 | 11,900 | |
| GLM-5.3 | DeepSeek Harness | 73% | $0.23 | 14,500 | |
| Kimi K3 | DeepSeek Harness | 72.4% | $0.23 | 6,100 | |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 72.3% | $0.42 | 11,600 | |
| | OpenClaw | 72% | $0.09 | 10,800 | |
| | Claude Code | 71.9% | $0.12 | 12,900 | |
| | Claude Code | 71.9% | $0.25 | 10,300 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | DeepSeek Harness | 71.8% | $0.36 | 2,600 | |
| | OpenClaw | 71.4% | $0.04 | 18,500 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | OpenClaw | 71.4% | $0.97 | 5,100 | |
| | OpenClaw | 70% | $0.29 | 9,700 | |
| Grok 4.6 | OpenClaw | 69.9% | $0.82 | 4,400 | |
| | Claude Code | 69.3% | $0.04 | 15,000 | |
| | Claude Code | 69.3% | $0.52 | 12,600 | |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 68.9% | $0.04 | 11,400 | |
| GLM-5.3 | OpenClaw | 68.8% | $0.18 | 10,200 | |
| | Codex | 67.9% | $0.23 | 13,100 | |
| Kimi K3 | Codex | 67.4% | $0.38 | 7,700 | |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 67.2% | $0.28 | 14,200 | |
| | Codex | 66.5% | $0.26 | 13,400 | |
| Grok 4.6 | Codex | 66.2% | $0.46 | 4,200 | |
| Claude Opus 5 | Codex | 65.4% | $2.12 | 7,600 | |
| | DeepSeek Harness | 65.2% | $0.02 | 11,200 | |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | Codex | 64.1% | $1.65 | 10,900 | |
| GLM-5.3 | Codex | 63.9% | $0.19 | 8,200 | |
| | Codex | 63.8% | $0.05 | 13,000 | |
| | Codex | 61.6% | $0.03 | 13,700 |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official TraceTrial-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official TraceTrial-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%