Benchmark Almanac

TravelPlanner

GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 4.40% tops its leaderboard
Not in model cards

Agents plan multi-day trips from a user request, using tools to search nearly four million records of flights, hotels, restaurants and attractions. Each plan must meet the user's hard constraints, such as budget, and commonsense rules. The headline final pass rate counts a plan only when it meets every constraint.

The 1,225 queries split into validation and test sets, and test scores come from submissions to the leaderboard. A sole-planning mode hands the model the gathered information and tests planning alone, so its scores differ from the tool-use mode. About 570 GitHub stars and 36 HF paper upvotes.

Released
February 2024
Kind
General assistants
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set

In the authors’ words

Planning has been part of the core pursuit for artificial intelligence since its conception, but earlier AI agents mostly focused on constrained settings because many of the cognitive substrates necessary for human-level planning have been lacking. Recently, language agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown interesting capabilities such as tool use and reasoning. Are these language agents capable of planning in more complex settings that are out of the reach of prior AI agents? To advance this investigation, we propose TravelPlanner, a new planning benchmark that focuses on travel planning, a common real-world planning scenario. It provides a rich sandbox environment, various tools for accessing nearly four million data records, and 1,225 meticulously curated planning intents and reference plans. Comprehensive evaluations show that the current language agents are not yet capable of handling such complex planning tasks-even GPT-4 only achieves a success rate of 0.6%. Language agents struggle to stay on task, use the right tools to collect information, or keep track of multiple constraints. However, we note that the mere possibility for language agents to tackle such a complex problem is in itself non-trivial progress. TravelPlanner provides a challenging yet meaningful testbed for future language agents.

Abstract of TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents (arXiv:2402.01622, CC0)
6
Entries on its own leaderboard, 0 models we track

GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) tops the leaderboard with 4.40%

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

  1. 1 GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) Sole-planning, Direct 4.40%
  2. 2 Gemini Pro (snapshot unspecified) Sole-planning, Direct 2.10%
  3. 3 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) Sole-planning, ReAct 0.70%
  4. 4 Mixtral-8x7B-MoE Sole-planning, Direct 0.70%
  5. 5 Mistral-7B-32K Two-stage 0%
  6. 6 Mixtral-8×7B-MoE Two-stage 0%

Source: Official TravelPlanner leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-4-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 4.40% Sole-planning, Direct Official leaderboard
2 Gemini Pro (snapshot unspecified) 2.10% Sole-planning, Direct Official leaderboard
3 GPT-3.5-Turbo (snapshot unspecified) 0.70% Sole-planning, ReAct Official leaderboard
4 Mixtral-8x7B-MoE 0.70% Sole-planning, Direct Official leaderboard
5 Mistral-7B-32K 0% Two-stage Official leaderboard
6 Mixtral-8×7B-MoE 0% Two-stage Official leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%