Benchmark Almanac

Wiki Live Challenge

Gemini-3-pro Deep Research 58.3 tops its leaderboard GPT-5 53.6 leads the models we track
Not in model cards

Deep research agents write articles on topics of 100 recent Wikipedia Good Articles, which serve as expert references. Scored on 39 writing criteria and factual verifiability.

A live benchmark that refreshes with the newest Good Articles. 33 HF paper upvotes.

Released
February 2026
Kind
Deep research
Level
Expert
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
Last model added
August 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Deep Research Agents (DRAs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in autonomous information retrieval and report generation, showing great potential to assist humans in complex research tasks. Current evaluation frameworks primarily rely on LLM-generated references or LLM-derived evaluation dimensions. While these approaches offer scalability, they often lack the reliability of expert-verified content and struggle to provide objective, fine-grained assessments of critical dimensions. To bridge this gap, we introduce Wiki Live Challenge (WLC), a live benchmark that leverages the newest Wikipedia Good Articles (GAs) as expert-level references. Wikipedia's strict standards for neutrality, comprehensiveness, and verifiability serve as a great challenge for DRAs, with GAs representing the pinnacle of which. We curate a dataset of 100 recent Good Articles and propose Wiki Eval, a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising a fine-grained evaluation method with 39 criteria for writing quality and rigorous metrics for factual verifiability. Extensive experiments on various DRA systems demonstrate a significant gap between current DRAs and human expert-level Wikipedia articles, validating the effectiveness of WLC in advancing agent research. We release our benchmark at https://github.com/WangShao2000/Wiki_Live_Challenge

Abstract of Wiki Live Challenge: Challenging Deep Research Agents with Expert-Level Wikipedia Articles (arXiv:2602.01590, CC0)
11
Entries on its own leaderboard, 2 models we track

Gemini-3-pro Deep Research tops the leaderboard with 58.3

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 53.6.

  1. 1 Gemini-3-pro Deep Research 58.3
  2. 2 GPT-5 53.6
  3. 3 Gemini-2.5-pro Deep Research 35.2
  4. 4 OpenAI o3 Deep Research 31.1
  5. 5 Grok Deep Search 28.4
  6. 6 Perplexity Deep Research 27.4
  7. 7 Qwen-3-max Deep Research 25.1
  8. 8 GPT-4.1 20.7
  9. 9 Doubao Deep Research 19.1
  10. 10 Tongyi Deep Research 15.1
  11. 11 Deep Researcher 2.28

Source: Official Wiki Live Challenge leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini-3-pro Deep Research 58.3 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5 53.6 Langchain Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini-2.5-pro Deep Research 35.2 Official leaderboard
4 OpenAI o3 Deep Research 31.1 Official leaderboard
5 Grok Deep Search 28.4 Official leaderboard
6 Perplexity Deep Research 27.4 Official leaderboard
7 Qwen-3-max Deep Research 25.1 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-4.1 20.7 Langchain Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Doubao Deep Research 19.1 Official leaderboard
10 Tongyi Deep Research 15.1 Official leaderboard
11 Deep Researcher 2.28 Official leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard
20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 2025 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 2025

Source: Official Wiki Live Challenge leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%