Wiki Live Challenge
Deep research agents write articles on topics of 100 recent Wikipedia Good Articles, which serve as expert references. Scored on 39 writing criteria and factual verifiability.
A live benchmark that refreshes with the newest Good Articles. 33 HF paper upvotes.
- Made by
- USTC and Metastone Technology (DeepResearch Bench team)
- Released
- February 2026
- Kind
- Deep research
- Level
- Expert
- Scored
- Graded by a model
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-5 #70 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Deep Research Agents (DRAs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in autonomous information retrieval and report generation, showing great potential to assist humans in complex research tasks. Current evaluation frameworks primarily rely on LLM-generated references or LLM-derived evaluation dimensions. While these approaches offer scalability, they often lack the reliability of expert-verified content and struggle to provide objective, fine-grained assessments of critical dimensions. To bridge this gap, we introduce Wiki Live Challenge (WLC), a live benchmark that leverages the newest Wikipedia Good Articles (GAs) as expert-level references. Wikipedia's strict standards for neutrality, comprehensiveness, and verifiability serve as a great challenge for DRAs, with GAs representing the pinnacle of which. We curate a dataset of 100 recent Good Articles and propose Wiki Eval, a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising a fine-grained evaluation method with 39 criteria for writing quality and rigorous metrics for factual verifiability. Extensive experiments on various DRA systems demonstrate a significant gap between current DRAs and human expert-level Wikipedia articles, validating the effectiveness of WLC in advancing agent research. We release our benchmark at https://github.com/WangShao2000/Wiki_Live_Challenge
Gemini-3-pro Deep Research tops the leaderboard with 58.3
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders. The best model we track is GPT-5, at 53.6.
Source: Official Wiki Live Challenge leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini-3-pro Deep Research | 58.3 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 2 | GPT-5 | 53.6 | Langchain | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Gemini-2.5-pro Deep Research | 35.2 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 4 | OpenAI o3 Deep Research | 31.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 5 | Grok Deep Search | 28.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 6 | Perplexity Deep Research | 27.4 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 7 | Qwen-3-max Deep Research | 25.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 8 | GPT-4.1 | 20.7 | Langchain | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Doubao Deep Research | 19.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 10 | Tongyi Deep Research | 15.1 | Official leaderboard | ||
| 11 | Deep Researcher | 2.28 | Official leaderboard |
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Wiki Live Challenge leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Tool use
- AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state.
Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
- MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks.
Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
- BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes.
Qwen3.7-Max 75%
- τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state.
Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
- Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
- DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%