Benchmark Almanac

WorldTravel

GPT-5.2 32.7% leads since February 2026
Seed1.8 47.2% leads since February 2026
Fading

Agents plan trips for 150 real-world scenarios across 5 cities with more than 15 tightly coupled time and logic constraints each. A web environment supplies multimodal travel data.

Seed1.8 first reported it as an internal benchmark in December 2025, before the paper. Seed1.8 reports best of five attempts.

Released
February 2026
Kind
General assistants
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Strongest model tested
GPT-5.2 #50 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
December 2025, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
March 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Real-world autonomous planning requires coordinating tightly coupled constraints where a single decision dictates the feasibility of all subsequent actions. However, existing benchmarks predominantly feature loosely coupled constraints solvable through local greedy decisions and rely on idealized data, failing to capture the complexity of extracting parameters from dynamic web environments. We introduce WorldTravel, a benchmark comprising 150 real-world travel scenarios across 5 cities that demand navigating an average of 15+ interdependent temporal and logical constraints. To evaluate agents in realistic deployments, we develop WorldTravel-Webscape, a multi-modal environment featuring over 2,000 rendered webpages where agents must perceive constraint parameters directly from visual layouts to inform their planning. Our evaluation of 10 frontier models reveals a significant performance collapse: even the state-of-the-art GPT-5.2 achieves only 32.67% feasibility in text-only settings, which plummets to 19.33% in multi-modal environments. We identify a critical Perception-Action Gap and a Planning Horizon threshold at approximately 10 constraints where model reasoning consistently fails, suggesting that perception and reasoning remain independent bottlenecks. These findings underscore the need for next-generation agents that unify high-fidelity visual perception with long-horizon reasoning to handle brittle real-world logistics.

Abstract of WorldTravel: A Realistic Multimodal Travel-Planning Benchmark with Tightly Coupled Constraints (arXiv:2602.08367, CC0)
10
Entries on its own leaderboard, 7 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab
2
System cards report it, from 1 lab

GPT-5.2 leads with 32.7% among models released by December 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Seed1.8 leads with 47.2%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5.2 Text Setting 32.7%
  2. 2 Claude Opus 4.5 Text Setting 21.3%
  3. 3 GPT-5.1 Text Setting 16.7%
  4. 4 Gemini 3 Pro Text Setting 14.7%
  5. 5 DeepSeek-V3.2 Text Setting 14%
  6. 6 Claude Sonnet 4.5 Text Setting 10%
  7. 7 Doubao-1.8-Pro Text Setting 8.67%
  8. 8 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) Text Setting 8.00%
  9. 9 GLM-4.6 Text Setting 8.00%
  10. 10 Qwen-3-A235B Text Setting 2.67%

Source: Official WorldTravel leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5.2 32.7% Text Setting Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Opus 4.5 21.3% Text Setting Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 GPT-5.1 16.7% Text Setting Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3 Pro 14.7% Text Setting Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 DeepSeek-V3.2 14% Text Setting Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Claude Sonnet 4.5 10% Text Setting Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Doubao-1.8-Pro 8.67% Text Setting Official leaderboard
8 Gemini-2.5-Pro (snapshot unspecified) 8.00% Text Setting Official leaderboard
9 GLM-4.6 8.00% Text Setting Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Qwen-3-A235B 2.67% Text Setting Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Seed1.8 47.2% Dec 2025 Lab model card
2 GPT-5.2 32.7% Text Setting Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.5 21.3% Text Setting Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.1 16.7% Text Setting Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 3 Pro 14.7% Text Setting Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
6 DeepSeek-V3.2 14% Text Setting Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Sonnet 4.5 10% Text Setting Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GLM-4.6 8.00% Text Setting Sep 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
GPT-5.2
Multi-modal… Text Setting
32.7%
Claude Opus 4.5
Multi-modal… Text Setting
21.3%
GPT-5.1
Multi-modal… Text Setting
16.7%
Gemini 3 Pro
Multi-modal… Text Setting
14.7%
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Multi-modal… Text Setting
10%

Source: Official WorldTravel leaderboard

ModelEffortHarnessScoreCost per taskOutput tokens
GPT-5.2 Text Setting 32.7%
Claude Opus 4.5 Text Setting 21.3%
GPT-5.2 Multi-modal Setting 19.3%
GPT-5.1 Text Setting 16.7%
Gemini 3 Pro Text Setting 14.7%
Claude Opus 4.5 Multi-modal Setting 14%
DeepSeek-V3.2 Text Setting 14%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Text Setting 10%
GLM-4.6 Text Setting 8.00%
Gemini 3 Pro Multi-modal Setting 8.00%
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Multi-modal Setting 2.67%
GPT-5.1 Multi-modal Setting 2.67%

Number one over time Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Feb 2026
GPT-5.2 32.7%

Source: Official WorldTravel leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.8 GPT-5.2 Claude Opus 4.5 GPT-5.1 Claude Sonnet 4.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Seed1.8 GPT-5.2

Sources: Official WorldTravel leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in December 2025

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Dec 18, 2025 Seed1.8 47.2 WorldTravel multi-modal (best of 5) 47.2 / text 52.1

2 system cards report it, from 1 lab

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Mar 21, 2026 Seed1.8 model card WorldTravel best of 5, multi-modal 47.2, text 52.1, no overall (Table 4) Capabilities
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card World Travel (VLM) 12.0, World Travel (TEXT) 23.3, no overall (Table 13) Capabilities

More in Tool use

All 144 in Tool use
  • AutomationBench In use Agent completes end-to-end business workflows inside a simulated company exposing dozens of REST APIs. Graded on resulting state. Gemini 4 Carbon 53.9%
  • MCP Atlas In use Multi-step workflows over real MCP servers. Scores tool-use competency on realistic tasks. Gemini 4 Argon 90.7%
  • BFCL V4 In use Models call functions and tools, including multi-turn agentic tasks with web search and memory. Checked against expected calls and outcomes. Qwen3.7-Max 75%
  • τ³-bench Banking In use Agents act as banking customer-service reps over many turns with a simulated user, following policy. Pass^1 on the final database state. Qwen 3.8 Max 55.1%
  • Toolathlon-Verified In use 108 long-horizon tasks across 32 apps through about 600 MCP tools. Execution-based checkers inspect final environment state. GLM-5.3-Flash 78.4%
  • DeepSearchQA In use Questions that need multi-step search and synthesis. Final answers graded against references. Kimi K3 95%