A^3-Bench
Models solve 2,198 science reasoning problems annotated with the anchors and attractors (prior knowledge) they need. An AAUI metric measures how much of that knowledge the model activates.
82 HF paper upvotes. No lab use found yet.
- Made by
- Jian Zhang, Yu He, Jun Liu et al.
- Released
- January 2026
- Kind
- Science questions
- Level
- University
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Short answer
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
DeepSeek-V3.2 #90 on the capability index
- Last model added
- December 2025
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Scientific reasoning relies not only on logical inference but also on activating prior knowledge and experiential structures. Memory can efficiently reuse knowledge and enhance reasoning consistency and stability. However, existing benchmarks mainly evaluate final answers or step-by-step coherence, overlooking the memory-driven mechanisms that underlie human reasoning, which involves activating anchors and attractors, then integrating them into multi-step inference. To address this gap, we propose A³-Bench~ https://a3-bench.github.io, a benchmark designed to evaluate scientific reasoning through dual-scale memory-driven activation, grounded in Anchor and Attractor Activation. First, we annotate 2,198 science reasoning problems across domains using the SAPM process(subject, anchor & attractor, problem, and memory developing). Second, we introduce a dual-scale memory evaluation framework utilizing anchors and attractors, along with the AAUI(Anchor–Attractor Utilization Index) metric to measure memory activation rates. Finally, through experiments with various base models and paradigms, we validate A³-Bench and analyze how memory activation impacts reasoning performance, providing insights into memory-driven scientific reasoning.
Grok 4 Fast leads with 65.1% among models released by December 2025
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Grok 4 Fast Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 65.1%
- 2 Qwen3-30B Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 60.6%
- 3
Qwen3-4B Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 58.9%
- 4 Claude Haiku 4.5 Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 56.4%
- 5
DeepSeek-V3.2 Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 56%
- 6 GLM-4-32B Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 48%
- 7 gpt-oss-120b HybridRAG retrieval 47.2%
- 8
Llama 3.1-70B Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 44.8%
- 9 GPT-5 mini Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) 25.3%
- 10 Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) HybridRAG retrieval 21.7%
Source: Official A^3-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4 Fast | 65.1% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Qwen3-30B | 60.6% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 58.9% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 56.4% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 56% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | GLM-4-32B | 48% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | gpt-oss-120b | 47.2% | HybridRAG retrieval | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 44.8% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-5 mini | 25.3% | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Gemini-2.5-Flash (snapshot unspecified) | 21.7% | HybridRAG retrieval | Official leaderboard |
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official A^3-Bench leaderboard
| Model | Effort | Harness | Score | Cost per task | Output tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4 Fast | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 65.1% | |||
| | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 58.9% | |||
| Grok 4 Fast | HybridRAG retrieval | 56.7% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 56.4% | |||
| | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 56% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | HybridRAG retrieval | 51.2% | |||
| Grok 4 Fast | Vanilla (no memory) | 47.5% | |||
| | HybridRAG retrieval | 47.3% | |||
| gpt-oss-120b | HybridRAG retrieval | 47.2% | |||
| gpt-oss-120b | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 47.2% | |||
| | Vanilla (no memory) | 45.4% | |||
| | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 44.8% | |||
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | Vanilla (no memory) | 41.3% | |||
| gpt-oss-120b | Vanilla (no memory) | 40.8% | |||
| | HybridRAG retrieval | 38.1% | |||
| | Vanilla (no memory) | 37.8% | |||
| | HybridRAG retrieval | 29% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | Oracle (expert anchors and attractors) | 25.3% | |||
| | Vanilla (no memory) | 24% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | Vanilla (no memory) | 22% | |||
| GPT-5 mini | HybridRAG retrieval | 18.7% |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official A^3-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official A^3-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%