Benchmark Almanac

HiPhO

Gemini 3 Pro 78.3% leads since November 2025
Qwen 3.8 Max 90% leads since August 2026
In use

Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.

Gemini 3 Pro reached gold-medal level on all 13 original olympiads by December 2025.

Released
September 2025
Kind
Science olympiads
Level
Competition
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026
Last model added
August 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

Recently, the physical capabilities of (M)LLMs have garnered increasing attention. However, existing benchmarks for physics suffer from two major gaps: they neither provide systematic and up-to-date coverage of real-world physics competitions such as physics Olympiads, nor enable direct performance comparison with humans. To bridge these gaps, we present HiPhO, the first benchmark dedicated to high school physics Olympiads with human-aligned evaluation. Specifically, HiPhO highlights three key innovations. (1) Comprehensive Data: It compiles 13 latest Olympiad exams from 2024-2025, spanning both international and regional competitions, and covering mixed modalities that encompass problems spanning text-only to diagram-based. (2) Professional Evaluation: We adopt official marking schemes to perform fine-grained grading at both the answer and step level, fully aligned with human examiners to ensure high-quality and domain-specific evaluation. (3) Comparison with Human Contestants: We assign gold, silver, and bronze medals to models based on official medal thresholds, thereby enabling direct comparison between (M)LLMs and human contestants. Our large-scale evaluation of 30 state-of-the-art (M)LLMs shows that: across 13 exams, open-source MLLMs mostly remain at or below the bronze level; open-source LLMs show promising progress with multiple golds; closed-source reasoning MLLMs can achieve 6 to 12 gold medals; and most models still have a significant gap from full marks. These results highlight the performance gap between open-source models and top students, the strong reasoning abilities of closed-source models, and the remaining room for improvement. HiPhO, a human-aligned Olympiad benchmark for multimodal physical reasoning, is open-source at https://github.com/SciYu/HiPhO with a public leaderboard at https://phyarena.github.io/.

Abstract of HiPhO: How Far Are (M)LLMs from Humans in the Latest High School Physics Olympiad Benchmark? (arXiv:2509.07894, CC0)
42
Entries on its own leaderboard, 36 models we track
3
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
1
System card reports it, from 1 lab

Gemini 3 Pro leads with 78.3% among models released by December 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Qwen 3.8 Max leads with 90%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in December 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
  2. 2 GPT-5.2 high 74.4%
  3. 3 P1-VL-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions 73.2%
  4. 4 P1-VL-235B-A22B 70.4%
  5. 5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 70.4%
  6. 6 P1-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions 70.2%
  7. 7 GPT-5 67.9%
  8. 8 P1-235B-A22B 66.2%
  9. 9 DeepSeek-V3.2 65.7%
  10. 10 o3 64.8%
  11. 11 Grok 4 64.4%
  12. 12 P1-VL-30B-A3B 63.1%
  13. 13 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B thinking 62.8%
  14. 14 gpt-oss-120b high 62.2%
  15. 15 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 61.5%
  16. 16 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025, thinking 61.5%
  17. 17 P1-30B-A3B 59.8%
  18. 18 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 59.6%
  19. 19 o4-mini high 59.5%
  20. 20 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 58%
  21. 21 Qwen3-235B-A22B 57.9%
  22. 22 Kimi K2 Thinking 57.2%
  23. 23 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking 57.1%
  24. 24 Qwen3-32B 55.4%
  25. 25 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025 54.6%
  26. 26 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 54.4%
  27. 27 Intern-S1 52.2%
  28. 28 Qwen3-30B-A3B 47.1%
  29. 29 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 45.7%
  30. 30 Mistral Medium 3 40.4%
  31. 31 InternVL3-78B 37.2%
  32. 32 GLM-4.5V 35.3%
  33. 33 GPT-4o Mar 2025 32.1%
  34. 34 Qwen3-8B 31.4%
  35. 35 Llama 4 Scout 29.9%
  36. 36 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 29%
  37. 37 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 28%
  38. 38 InternVL3-38B 25.8%
  39. 39 InternVL3-9B 15.6%
  40. 40 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 12.2%
  41. 41 Phi-4-multimodal 10.6%
  42. 42 DeepSeek-VL2 8.40%

Source: Official HiPhO leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official HiPhO leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Gemini 3 Pro 78.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 GPT-5.2 74.4% high Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
3 P1-VL-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions 73.2% Official leaderboard
4 P1-VL-235B-A22B 70.4% Official leaderboard
5 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 70.4% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
6 P1-235B-A22B + PhysicsMinions 70.2% Official leaderboard
7 GPT-5 67.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
8 P1-235B-A22B 66.2% Official leaderboard
9 DeepSeek-V3.2 65.7% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
10 o3 64.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4 64.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
12 P1-VL-30B-A3B 63.1% Official leaderboard
13 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 62.8% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
14 gpt-oss-120b 62.2% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 61.5% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 61.5% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
17 P1-30B-A3B 59.8% Official leaderboard
18 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 59.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
19 o4-mini 59.5% high Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Claude Sonnet 4 58% thinking May 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen3-235B-A22B 57.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Kimi K2 Thinking 57.2% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking 57.1% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Qwen3-32B 55.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025 54.6% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 54.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Intern-S1 52.2% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Qwen3-30B-A3B 47.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
29 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 45.7% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Mistral Medium 3 40.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
31 InternVL3-78B 37.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
32 GLM-4.5V 35.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
33 GPT-4o Mar 2025 32.1% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen3-8B 31.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
35 Llama 4 Scout 29.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
36 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 29% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
37 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 28% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
38 InternVL3-38B 25.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
39 InternVL3-9B 15.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
40 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 12.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
41 Phi-4-multimodal 10.6% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
42 DeepSeek-VL2 8.40% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Qwen 3.8 Max 90% Aug 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen3.7-Plus 84.1% Jun 2026 Lab model card
3 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 83.8% Apr 2026 Lab model card
4 Gemini 3 Pro 78.3% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.2 74.4% high Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Seed2.0 Pro 74.1% Feb 2026 Lab model card
7 Gemini 2.5 Pro Jun 2025 70.4% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5 67.9% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
9 DeepSeek-V3.2 65.7% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
10 o3 64.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Grok 4 64.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B 62.8% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
13 gpt-oss-120b 62.2% high Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking Jul 2025 61.5% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
15 Gemini 2.5 Flash Sep 2025 61.5% thinking Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
16 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 59.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
17 o4-mini 59.5% high Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Claude Sonnet 4 58% thinking May 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Qwen3-235B-A22B 57.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Kimi K2 Thinking 57.2% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
21 Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Thinking 57.1% Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Qwen3-32B 55.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking Jul 2025 54.6% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
24 Kimi K2 Jul 2025 54.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
25 Intern-S1 52.2% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
26 Qwen3-30B-A3B 47.1% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
27 DeepSeek-V3 Mar 2025 45.7% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Mistral Medium 3 40.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
29 InternVL3-78B 37.2% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
30 GLM-4.5V 35.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
31 GPT-4o Mar 2025 32.1% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
32 Qwen3-8B 31.4% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
33 Llama 4 Scout 29.9% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 29% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
35 Qwen2.5-VL-32B 28% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
36 InternVL3-38B 25.8% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
37 InternVL3-9B 15.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
38 Qwen2.5-VL-7B 12.2% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
39 Phi-4-multimodal 10.6% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
40 DeepSeek-VL2 8.40% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 4 models in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
gpt-oss-120b
high
62.2%
o4-mini
high
59.5%
Claude Sonnet 4
thinking
58%

Source: Official HiPhO leaderboard

2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in September 2025 5 models have held number one with claims included since its release in September 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Google DeepMind ByteDance Seed Qwen
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
Lab claims Passed 85% in Aug 2026, by Qwen 3.8 Max

Sources: Official HiPhO leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Qwen’s own number for Qwen 3.8 Max passed 85% in August 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Qwen3.7-Plus Gemini 3 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro o3 DeepSeek-V3 Qwen2.5-VL-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) Qwen 3.8 Max Gemini 3 Pro

Sources: Official HiPhO leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

ByteDance Seed
Qwen
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 90 HiPhO
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 84.1 HiPhO
Apr 28, 2026 Seed2.0 Lite (0428) 83.8 HiPhO

One system card reports it

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Feb 14, 2026 Seed2.0 Pro model card 74.1 HiPhO, mean normalized score over 13 olympiads (Table 8) Capabilities

More in Science and reasoning

All 92 in Science and reasoning
  • GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics. Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
  • Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
  • FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics. Intern-S2-397B 87%
  • BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
  • LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%
  • SGI-Bench In use Models work through more than 1,000 expert samples in four scientist tasks: deep research, idea generation, dry and wet experiments, and experimental reasoning. Gemini 3 Pro 33.8%