Benchmark Almanac

AdvancedIF

MAI-Thinking-1 85% leads since June 2026
In use

Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics.

Released
November 2025
Kind
Following precise instructions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Graded by a model
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Kimi K2.5 #75 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
September 2026
Last model added
September 2026

In the authors’ words

Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has led to impressive performance on a range of tasks, yet advanced instruction following (IF)-especially for complex, multi-turn, and system-prompted instructions-remains a significant challenge. Rigorous evaluation and effective training for such capabilities are hindered by the lack of high-quality, human-annotated benchmarks and reliable, interpretable reward signals. In this work, we introduce AdvancedIF (we will release this benchmark soon), a comprehensive benchmark featuring over 1,600 prompts and expert-curated rubrics that assess LLMs ability to follow complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. We further propose RIFL (Rubric-based Instruction-Following Learning), a novel post-training pipeline that leverages rubric generation, a finetuned rubric verifier, and reward shaping to enable effective reinforcement learning for instruction following. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RIFL substantially improves the instruction-following abilities of LLMs, achieving a 6.7% absolute gain on AdvancedIF and strong results on public benchmarks. Our ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of each component in RIFL. This work establishes rubrics as a powerful tool for both training and evaluating advanced IF in LLMs, paving the way for more capable and reliable AI systems.

Abstract of AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Following (arXiv:2511.10507, CC0)
6
Models scored in lab cards
5
Launch posts list it, from 4 labs
3
System cards report it, from 2 labs

MAI-Thinking-1 leads with 85% among models released by September 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  2. 2 Tencent Hy3 preview 79.5%
  3. 3 Kimi K2.5 75.6%
  4. 4 ERNIE 5.1 72.3%
  5. 5 Intern-S2-397B 71.6%
  6. 6 MAI-Code-1-Flash 71.4%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 MAI-Thinking-1 85% Jun 2026 Lab model card
2 Tencent Hy3 preview 79.5% Apr 2026 Lab model card
3 Kimi K2.5 75.6% Jan 2026 Lab model card
4 ERNIE 5.1 72.3% May 2026 Lab model card
5 Intern-S2-397B 71.6% Sep 2026 Lab model card
6 MAI-Code-1-Flash 71.4% Jun 2026 Lab model card

3 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in November 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Moonshot AI Tencent Microsoft
Lab claims Passed 85% in Jun 2026, by MAI-Thinking-1

Source: Labs’ model cards

Microsoft’s own number for MAI-Thinking-1 passed 85% in June 2026

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Thinking-1 Tencent Hy3 preview Kimi K2.5 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) MAI-Thinking-1 Kimi K2.5

Source: Labs’ model cards

2 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Tencent
Baidu
Microsoft
Shanghai AI Lab
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Sep 13, 2026 Intern-S2-397B 71.6 AdvancedIF
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Code-1-Flash 71.4 Advanced IF (average)
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 85 Adv. IF
May 9, 2026 ERNIE 5.1 72.3 AdvanceIF (acc)
Apr 23, 2026 Tencent Hy3 preview 79.5 AdvancedIF (CIF&CC subsets)

3 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 technical report 85 Adv. IF, rubric-level score (Table 12, rounded) Capabilities
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Code-1-Flash model card 71.4 Advanced IF, rubric-based, average (Instruction following table) Capabilities
Jan 30, 2026 Kimi K2.5 technical report 75.6 AdvancedIF (Table 4) Capabilities

More in Instructions and chat

All 81 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • IFBench In use 58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose). Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%
  • HANDBOOK.md In use Agents do routine company work with mock email, chat, calendar, issue and commerce tools while following a 20 to 124 page handbook. Programmatic criteria check required and forbidden actions, and a trial passes only if all pass. Claude Opus 5.5 52.3%