Benchmark Almanac

IFBench

Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9% leads since March 2026
In use

58 new out-of-domain verifiable output constraints. Scored by programmatic constraint checks (strict or loose).

The maker fixed several verifiers in 2026, including six that mis-scored correct answers (July 17th, 2026), so later runs can score slightly higher. Task set unchanged. An optional two-turn split is in IFBench_multi-turn.

Made by
AllenAI
Released
July 2025
Kind
Following precise instructions
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Qwen 3.8 Max #29 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026

In the authors’ words

A crucial factor for successful human and AI interaction is the ability of language models or chatbots to follow human instructions precisely. A common feature of instructions are output constraints like “only answer with yes or no" or “mention the word `abrakadabra' at least 3 times" that the user adds to craft a more useful answer. Even today's strongest models struggle with fulfilling such constraints. We find that most models strongly overfit on a small set of verifiable constraints from the benchmarks that test these abilities, a skill called precise instruction following, and are not able to generalize well to unseen output constraints. We introduce a new benchmark, IFBench, to evaluate precise instruction following generalization on 58 new, diverse, and challenging verifiable out-of-domain constraints. In addition, we perform an extensive analysis of how and on what data models can be trained to improve precise instruction following generalization. Specifically, we carefully design constraint verification modules and show that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) significantly improves instruction following. In addition to IFBench, we release 29 additional new hand-annotated training constraints and verification functions, RLVR training prompts, and code.

Abstract of Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Following (arXiv:2507.02833, CC0)
80
Models scored in lab cards
67
Launch posts list it, from 21 labs
43
System cards report it, from 17 labs

Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B leads with 82.9%

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

80 models. Scroll sideways for the rest.

  1. 82.9 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B
  2. 82.8 Qwen 3.8 Max
  3. 82.2 Inkling-Small
  4. 81.7 Nemotron 3 Ultra
  5. 81.5 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
  6. 81.3 Qwen3.8 Flash
  7. 80.2 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
  8. 80.0 Solar Open 2
  9. 79.8 Inkling
  10. 79.7 Beam 1.0
  11. 79.5 Qwen 3.8 27B
  12. 79.1 Qwen3.7-Max
  13. 79.1 Qwen3.7-Plus
  14. 77.2 Granite 4.2 30B
  15. 77.0 Muse Glimmer
  16. 77.0 Mercury 2.5
  17. 76.8 Mercury 3
  18. 76.5 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
  19. 76.5 Qwen3.5-27B
  20. 76.1 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
  21. 76.0 MiniMax-M2.7
  22. 76.0 Gemma 4 31B IT
  23. 75.8 Spark-X2.6-4B
  24. 75.0 MAI-Code-1-Flash
  25. 74.7 LFM2.5-24B-A2B
  26. 74.2 Qwen 3.6 Plus
  27. 74.2 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B
  28. 74.0 Command A+
  29. 73.1 Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update)
  30. 73.0 LFM3-1.7B
  31. 72.6 K-EXAONE 2.0
  32. 72.6 Nemotron 3 Super
  33. 72.0 MiniMax-M2
  34. 72.0 GLM-5
  35. 72.0 MiniMax-M2.5
  36. 72.0 Gemma 4 26B A4B
  37. 72.0 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
  38. 71.5 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
  39. 71.2 Intern-S1-Pro
  40. 71.0 Mercury 2
  41. 70.9 Qwen3-Max
  42. 70.9 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
  43. 70.8 Nova 2 Lite
  44. 70.2 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
  45. 70.0 MiniMax-M2.1
  46. 69.0 Mistral Medium 3.5
  47. 69.0 MAI-Thinking-1
  48. 68.7 Nova 2 Omni Preview
  49. 68.1 Olmo 3.1 32B Think
  50. 67.4 Step 3.5 Flash
  51. 67.3 K-EXAONE
  52. 66.2 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
  53. 64.5 Qwen3.5-9B
  54. 64.0 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B
  55. 62.6 EXAONE 4.5 33B
  56. 59.2 Qwen3.5-4B
  57. 59.2 LFM2.5-2.6B
  58. 57.6 Ling-2.6-1T
  59. 56.5 LFM2.5-8B-A1B
  60. 55.8 Solar Pro 3
  61. 53.7 Solar Open 100B
  62. 53.4 Falcon H1R 7B
  63. 52.6 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus
  64. 52.3 Trinity Large Thinking
  65. 48.0 Mistral Small 4
  66. 47.6 Olmo 3 32B Think
  67. 47.3 LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct
  68. 44.9 LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking
  69. 44.0 Gemma 4 E4B
  70. 43.3 STEP3-VL-10B
  71. 43.2 Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
  72. 41.3 Qwen3.5-2B
  73. 38.0 Gemma 4 E2B
  74. 34.6 nvidia-nemotron-nano-9b-v2
  75. 32.0 Cosmos3-Nano
  76. 25.9 LFM2-8B-A1B
  77. 25.8 LFM2.5-VL-3B
  78. 21.0 Qwen3.5-0.8B
  79. 20.8 Cosmos3-Edge
  80. 20.7 LFM2-1.2B
  1. 1 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9%
  2. 2 Qwen 3.8 Max 82.8%
  3. 3 Inkling-Small 82.2%
  4. 4 Nemotron 3 Ultra 81.7%
  5. 5 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 81.5%
  6. 6 Qwen3.8 Flash 81.3%
  7. 7 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 80.2%
  8. 8 Solar Open 2 80%
  9. 9 Inkling 79.8%
  10. 10 Beam 1.0 79.7%
  11. 11 Qwen 3.8 27B 79.5%
  12. 12 Qwen3.7-Max 79.1%
  13. 13 Qwen3.7-Plus 79.1%
  14. 14 Granite 4.2 30B 77.2%
  15. 15 Muse Glimmer 77%
  16. 16 Mercury 2.5 77%
  17. 17 Mercury 3 76.8%
  18. 18 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 76.5%
  19. 19 Qwen3.5-27B 76.5%
  20. 20 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.1%
  21. 21 MiniMax-M2.7 76%
  22. 22 Gemma 4 31B IT 76%
  23. 23 Spark-X2.6-4B 75.8%
  24. 24 MAI-Code-1-Flash 75%
  25. 25 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 74.7%
  26. 26 Qwen 3.6 Plus 74.2%
  27. 27 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 74.2%
  28. 28 Command A+ 74%
  29. 29 Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update) 73.1%
  30. 30 LFM3-1.7B 73%
  31. 31 K-EXAONE 2.0 72.6%
  32. 32 Nemotron 3 Super 72.6%
  33. 33 MiniMax-M2 72%
  34. 34 GLM-5 72%
  35. 35 MiniMax-M2.5 72%
  36. 36 Gemma 4 26B A4B 72%
  37. 37 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 72%
  38. 38 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 71.5%
  39. 39 Intern-S1-Pro 71.2%
  40. 40 Mercury 2 71%
  41. 41 Qwen3-Max 70.9%
  42. 42 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 70.9%
  43. 43 Nova 2 Lite 70.8%
  44. 44 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 70.2%
  45. 45 MiniMax-M2.1 70%
  46. 46 Mistral Medium 3.5 69%
  47. 47 MAI-Thinking-1 69%
  48. 48 Nova 2 Omni Preview 68.7%
  49. 49 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 68.1%
  50. 50 Step 3.5 Flash 67.4%
  51. 51 K-EXAONE 67.3%
  52. 52 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 66.2%
  53. 53 Qwen3.5-9B 64.5%
  54. 54 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 64%
  55. 55 EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.6%
  56. 56 Qwen3.5-4B 59.2%
  57. 57 LFM2.5-2.6B 59.2%
  58. 58 Ling-2.6-1T 57.6%
  59. 59 LFM2.5-8B-A1B 56.5%
  60. 60 Solar Pro 3 55.8%
  61. 61 Solar Open 100B 53.7%
  62. 62 Falcon H1R 7B 53.4%
  63. 63 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 52.6%
  64. 64 Trinity Large Thinking 52.3%
  65. 65 Mistral Small 4 48%
  66. 66 Olmo 3 32B Think 47.6%
  67. 67 LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct 47.3%
  68. 68 LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking 44.9%
  69. 69 Gemma 4 E4B 44%
  70. 70 STEP3-VL-10B 43.3%
  71. 71 Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 43.2%
  72. 72 Qwen3.5-2B 41.3%
  73. 73 Gemma 4 E2B 38%
  74. 74 nvidia-nemotron-nano-9b-v2 34.6%
  75. 75 Cosmos3-Nano 32%
  76. 76 LFM2-8B-A1B 25.9%
  77. 77 LFM2.5-VL-3B 25.8%
  78. 78 Qwen3.5-0.8B 21%
  79. 79 Cosmos3-Edge 20.8%
  80. 80 LFM2-1.2B 20.7%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9% Mar 2026 Lab model card
2 Qwen 3.8 Max 82.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
3 Inkling-Small 82.2% Jul 2026 Lab model card
4 Nemotron 3 Ultra 81.7% Jun 2026 Lab model card
5 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 81.5% Sep 2026 Lab model card
6 Qwen3.8 Flash 81.3% Aug 2026 Lab model card
7 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 80.2% Dec 2025 Lab model card
8 Solar Open 2 80% Jul 2026 Lab model card
9 Inkling 79.8% Jul 2026 Lab model card
10 Beam 1.0 79.7% Oct 2026 Lab model card
11 Qwen 3.8 27B 79.5% Aug 2026 Lab model card
12 Qwen3.7-Max 79.1% May 2026 Lab model card
13 Qwen3.7-Plus 79.1% Jun 2026 Lab model card
14 Granite 4.2 30B 77.2% Aug 2026 Lab model card
15 Muse Glimmer 77% Aug 2026 Lab model card
16 Mercury 2.5 77% Sep 2026 Lab model card
17 Mercury 3 76.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
18 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 76.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
19 Qwen3.5-27B 76.5% Feb 2026 Lab model card
20 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.1% Feb 2026 Lab model card
21 MiniMax-M2.7 76% May 2026 Lab model card
22 Gemma 4 31B IT 76% Jul 2026 Lab model card
23 Spark-X2.6-4B 75.8% Oct 2026 Lab model card
24 MAI-Code-1-Flash 75% Jun 2026 Lab model card
25 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 74.7% Oct 2026 Lab model card
26 Qwen 3.6 Plus 74.2% Apr 2026 Lab model card
27 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B 74.2% Apr 2026 Lab model card
28 Command A+ 74% May 2026 Lab model card
29 Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update) 73.1% Mar 2026 Lab model card
30 LFM3-1.7B 73% Oct 2026 Lab model card
31 K-EXAONE 2.0 72.6% Jul 2026 Lab model card
32 Nemotron 3 Super 72.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
33 MiniMax-M2 72% Oct 2025 Lab model card
34 GLM-5 72% Feb 2026 Lab model card
35 MiniMax-M2.5 72% May 2026 Lab model card
36 Gemma 4 26B A4B 72% Jul 2026 Lab model card
37 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 72% Oct 2026 Lab model card
38 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 71.5% Dec 2025 Lab model card
39 Intern-S1-Pro 71.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
40 Mercury 2 71% Feb 2026 Lab model card
41 Qwen3-Max 70.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
42 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 70.9% Oct 2026 Lab model card
43 Nova 2 Lite 70.8% Dec 2025 Lab model card
44 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 70.2% Feb 2026 Lab model card
45 MiniMax-M2.1 70% Dec 2025 Lab model card
46 Mistral Medium 3.5 69% May 2026 Lab model card
47 MAI-Thinking-1 69% Jun 2026 Lab model card
48 Nova 2 Omni Preview 68.7% Dec 2025 Lab model card
49 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 68.1% Dec 2025 Lab model card
50 Step 3.5 Flash 67.4% Feb 2026 Lab model card
51 K-EXAONE 67.3% Dec 2025 Lab model card
52 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B 66.2% Oct 2026 Lab model card
53 Qwen3.5-9B 64.5% Mar 2026 Lab model card
54 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 64% Oct 2026 Lab model card
55 EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.6% Apr 2026 Lab model card
56 Qwen3.5-4B 59.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
57 LFM2.5-2.6B 59.2% Aug 2026 Lab model card
58 Ling-2.6-1T 57.6% Jun 2026 Lab model card
59 LFM2.5-8B-A1B 56.5% May 2026 Lab model card
60 Solar Pro 3 55.8% Jan 2026 Lab model card
61 Solar Open 100B 53.7% Dec 2025 Lab model card
62 Falcon H1R 7B 53.4% Jan 2026 Lab model card
63 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 52.6% Mar 2026 Lab model card
64 Trinity Large Thinking 52.3% Apr 2026 Lab model card
65 Mistral Small 4 48% Mar 2026 Lab model card
66 Olmo 3 32B Think 47.6% Nov 2025 Lab model card
67 LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct 47.3% Jan 2026 Lab model card
68 LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking 44.9% Jan 2026 Lab model card
69 Gemma 4 E4B 44% Jul 2026 Lab model card
70 STEP3-VL-10B 43.3% Jan 2026 Lab model card
71 Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 43.2% Mar 2026 Lab model card
72 Qwen3.5-2B 41.3% Mar 2026 Lab model card
73 Gemma 4 E2B 38% Jul 2026 Lab model card
74 nvidia-nemotron-nano-9b-v2 34.6% Aug 2025 Lab model card
75 Cosmos3-Nano 32% May 2026 Lab model card
76 LFM2-8B-A1B 25.9% Oct 2025 Lab model card
77 LFM2.5-VL-3B 25.8% Aug 2026 Lab model card
78 Qwen3.5-0.8B 21% Mar 2026 Lab model card
79 Cosmos3-Edge 20.8% May 2026 Lab model card
80 LFM2-1.2B 20.7% Jul 2025 Lab model card

5 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in July 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

Liquid AI Other labs MiniMax Amazon NVIDIA
Lab claims 5 leaders

Source: Labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B Nova 2.0 Pro Preview MiniMax-M2 nvidia-nemotron-nano-9b-v2 LFM2-1.2B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B MiniMax-M2

Source: Labs’ model cards

12 labs put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Liquid AI
MiniMax
Ai2
Amazon
NVIDIA
LG AI Research
Upstage
Technology Innovation Institute
Qwen
Shanghai AI Lab
Inception Labs
Mistral AI
Arcee AI
Ant Group
Cohere
Microsoft
Thinking Machines
Meta
IBM
Reflection
iFlytek
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 27, 2026 LFM3-1.7B 73 IFBench
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 64 IFBench
Oct 22, 2026 Spark-X2.6-4B 75.8 IFBench
Oct 19, 2026 Mercury 3 76.8 IFBench
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 70.9 IFBench
Oct 13, 2026 LFM2.5-24B-A2B 74.7 IFBench
Oct 5, 2026 Beam 1.0 79.7 IFBench
Sep 18, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash 81.5 IFBench
Sep 8, 2026 Mercury 2.5 77 IFBench
Aug 26, 2026 Qwen3.8 Flash 81.3 Instruction following IFBench
Aug 25, 2026 Granite 4.2 30B 77.2 IFBench (prompt)
Aug 14, 2026 Qwen 3.8 27B 79.5 Instruction following IFBench
Aug 12, 2026 LFM2.5-VL-3B 25.8 IFBench
Aug 11, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B 71.9 IFBench (loose)
Aug 10, 2026 Muse Glimmer 77 IFBench
Aug 4, 2026 LFM2.5-2.6B 59.2 IFBench
Aug 3, 2026 Qwen 3.8 Max 82.8 IFBench
Jul 31, 2026 K-EXAONE 2.0 72.6 IFBench
Jul 30, 2026 Inkling-Small 82.2 IFBench
Jul 22, 2026 Solar Open 2 80 IFBench
Jul 15, 2026 Inkling 79.8 IFBench
Jun 4, 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra 81.7 IFBench (prompt loose)
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Code-1-Flash 75 IF Bench (average)
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 69 IF Bench
Jun 1, 2026 Qwen3.7-Plus 79.1 IFBench
May 28, 2026 LFM2.5-8B-A1B 56.5 IFBench
May 22, 2026 Mistral Medium 3.5 69 Allenai Ifbench
May 20, 2026 Command A+ 74 IFBench (single turn, loose, prompt accuracy)
May 20, 2026 Qwen3.7-Max 79.1 IFBench
Apr 29, 2026 Ling-2.6-1T 57 IFBench
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B 62.6 IFBench
Apr 2, 2026 Qwen 3.6 Plus 74.2 IFBench
Apr 1, 2026 Trinity Large Thinking 52.3 IFBench
Mar 30, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus 52.6 IFBench
Mar 24, 2026 Solar Pro 3 (March 2026 update) 73.1 IFBench
Mar 19, 2026 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B 82.9 IFBench (prompt)
Mar 16, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano 4B 43.2 IFBench-Prompt (reasoning off); Instruction 44.2
Mar 16, 2026 Mistral Small 4 48 AllenAI IFBench (reasoning; instruct = 35.7)
Mar 11, 2026 Nemotron 3 Super 72.6 IFBench (prompt)
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-0.8B 21 IFBench
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-2B 41.3 IFBench
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-4B 59.2 IFBench
Mar 2, 2026 Qwen3.5-9B 64.5 IFBench
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B 70.2 IFBench
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-27B 76.5 IFBench
Feb 24, 2026 Mercury 2 71 IFBench
Feb 24, 2026 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 76.1 IFBench
Feb 16, 2026 Qwen3.5 397B-A17B 76.5 IFBench
Feb 12, 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 70 IFBench
Feb 2, 2026 Intern-S1-Pro 71.2 IFBench
Jan 26, 2026 Solar Pro 3 55.8 IFBench
Jan 23, 2026 Qwen3-Max 70.9 IFBench
Jan 20, 2026 LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking 44.9 IFBench (± 0.73)
Jan 5, 2026 Falcon H1R 7B 53.4 IFBench
Jan 5, 2026 LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct 47.3 IFBench
Dec 31, 2025 Solar Open 100B 53.7 IFBench
Dec 31, 2025 K-EXAONE 67.3 IFBench
Dec 23, 2025 MiniMax-M2.1 70 IFBench
Dec 15, 2025 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B 71.5 IFBench (prompt)
Dec 12, 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think 68.1 IFBench
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview 68.7 IF-Bench prompt loose acc
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Lite 70.8 IF-Bench prompt loose acc
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview 80.2 IF-Bench prompt loose acc
Nov 20, 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think 47.6 IFBench
Oct 27, 2025 MiniMax-M2 72 IFBench (AA)
Oct 7, 2025 LFM2-8B-A1B 25.9 IFBench
Jul 10, 2025 LFM2-1.2B 20.7 IFBench

43 system cards report it, from 17 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 23, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B technical report 64 IFBench, released Q4_K_M imatrix checkpoint (Table 5). BF16 63.79 (Table 3) Capabilities
Oct 19, 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 77 IFBench, high (Tables 2 and 5) Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Super VL technical report 70.9 IFBench, strict (Table 10) Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B technical report 72 IFBench (loose), BF16 acc. (Table 22) Capabilities
Oct 15, 2026 Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B technical report 66.2 IFBench (instruction loose), released 24GB checkpoint (Table 7). BF16 68.71 Capabilities
Sep 22, 2026 Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash technical report 81.5 IFBench (Table 2) Capabilities
Aug 5, 2026 K-EXAONE 2.0 technical report 72.6 IFBench (Table 6, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
Jul 30, 2026 Inkling-Small model card 82.2 IFBench (5. Evaluations table) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 E4B technical report 44 IFBench, thinking (Table 5) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 E2B technical report 38 IFBench, thinking (Table 5) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 31B IT technical report 76 IFBench, thinking (Table 5) Capabilities
Jul 24, 2026 Gemma 4 26B A4B technical report 72 IFBench, thinking (Table 5) Capabilities
Jul 22, 2026 Solar Open 2 technical report 80 IFBench (Table 3) Capabilities
Jul 15, 2026 Inkling model card 79.8 IFBench (5. Evaluations table, effort 0.99) Capabilities
Jun 13, 2026 Ling-2.6-1T technical report 57.6 IFBench, Mean@5 (Table 5) Capabilities
Jun 9, 2026 Nemotron 3 Ultra technical report 81.7 IFBench (prompt loose) (Table 10) Capabilities
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Thinking-1 technical report 69 IF Bench (Table 12, rounded) Capabilities
Jun 2, 2026 MAI-Code-1-Flash model card 75 IF Bench, average (Instruction following table) Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Nano technical report 32 IFBench, Cosmos3-Nano 8B column, Table 10 Capabilities
May 31, 2026 Cosmos3-Edge technical report 20.8 IFBench, Cosmos3-Edge 2B column, Table 10 Capabilities
May 26, 2026 MiniMax-M2.7 technical report 76 IFBench, AA Index v4.0 protocol (Table 4) Capabilities
May 26, 2026 MiniMax-M2.5 technical report 72 IFBench, AA Index v4.0 protocol (Table 4) Capabilities
Apr 27, 2026 Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B-A3B technical report 74.2 IFBench (prompt) (Table 10) Capabilities
Apr 17, 2026 Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus technical report 52.6 IFBench (Table 4) Capabilities
Apr 9, 2026 EXAONE 4.5 33B technical report 62.6 IFBench (Table 3, Reasoning mode) Capabilities
Mar 26, 2026 Intern-S1-Pro technical report 71.2 IFBench, thinking (Table 2) Capabilities
Mar 19, 2026 Nemotron-Cascade 2 30B-A3B technical report 82.9 IFBench (prompt) (Table 1) Capabilities
Mar 11, 2026 Nemotron 3 Super technical report 72.6 IFBench (prompt) (Table 5). Table 8 BF16 prints 72.58 Capabilities
Feb 17, 2026 GLM-5 technical report 72 IFBench, Instruction Following panel (Figure 11) Capabilities
Feb 11, 2026 Step 3.5 Flash technical report 67.4 IFBench (Table 5). PaCoRe 56.8 Capabilities
Jan 14, 2026 STEP3-VL-10B technical report 43.3 IFBench, SeRe (Table 2) Capabilities
Jan 11, 2026 Solar Open 100B technical report 53.7 IFBench (Table 6) Capabilities
Jan 5, 2026 Falcon H1R 7B technical report 53.4 IFBench (Table 6) Capabilities
Jan 5, 2026 K-EXAONE technical report 67.3 IFBench, prompt-loose (Table 3, Reasoning mode). Non-reasoning 40.5 (Table 4) Capabilities
Dec 23, 2025 Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B technical report 71.5 IFBench (prompt) (Table 3) Capabilities
Dec 15, 2025 Olmo 3 32B Think technical report 47.6 IFBench, Final Think 3.0 column (Tables 14 and 24) Capabilities
Dec 15, 2025 Olmo 3.1 32B Think technical report 68.1 IFBench (Tables 1, 14 and 24) Capabilities
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Omni Preview technical report 68.7 IF-Bench prompt loose acc (Table 5) Capabilities
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2 Lite technical report 70.8 IF-Bench prompt loose acc (Table 1) Capabilities
Dec 2, 2025 Nova 2.0 Pro Preview technical report 80.2 IF-Bench prompt loose acc (Table 1) Capabilities
Nov 28, 2025 LFM2-8B-A1B technical report 25.9 IFBench, LFM2-8B-A1B (Table 7) Capabilities
Nov 28, 2025 LFM2-1.2B technical report 20.7 IFBench, LFM2-1.2B (Table 6) Capabilities
Aug 20, 2025 nvidia-nemotron-nano-9b-v2 technical report 34.6 IFBench (Instr. Following), NVIDIA-Nemotron-Nano-9B-v2 (Figure 1) Capabilities

3 logged changes that move scores

Changes by the maintainers, so a score from before a change may not compare with one from after it. Newest first, each with the maintainers' own source. The list may be incomplete. What we log.

  1. Grader changed July 17th, 2026

    The maintainers fixed six instruction verifiers that incorrectly accepted or rejected responses. Scores can move in either direction without changing the task set. Source

  2. Grader changed January 4th, 2026

    The maintainers fixed verifier crashes, case handling, tokenization, and word-boundary matching. The revised checks can assign different results to identical responses. Source

  3. Scores recomputed November 11th, 2025

    The maintainers revised the leaderboard after fixing IFBench verifiers. Earlier published scores can differ from the revised results. Source

Versions

More in Instructions and chat

All 81 in Instructions and chat
  • IFEval In use Models answer about 500 prompts containing verifiable instructions such as word limits or required keywords. Code checks each instruction for strict and loose accuracy. Gemma 4 31B IT 98.9%
  • MultiChallenge In use Multi-turn conversations testing instruction retention, inference memory, versioned editing and self-coherence. Graded by LLM judge with rubrics. GPT-6.1 Sol 82%
  • Multi-IF In use Models follow verifiable instructions over three-turn conversations in eight languages, extending IFEval. Scored by instruction accuracy at each turn. LFM3-1.7B 89.1%
  • AdvancedIF In use Models respond to over 1,600 prompts with complex, multi-turn, and system-level instructions. A judge model checks each response against expert-written rubrics. MAI-Thinking-1 85%
  • IFStruct In use Models generate JSON or YAML that must follow a requested schema and phrasing constraints, without constrained decoding. A response passes only if every structural constraint holds. Gemma 4 31B IT 95.9%
  • HANDBOOK.md In use Agents do routine company work with mock email, chat, calendar, issue and commerce tools while following a 20 to 124 page handbook. Programmatic criteria check required and forbidden actions, and a trial passes only if all pass. Claude Opus 5.5 52.3%