AgentDojo
Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs.
Labs also report utility under attack. xAI reports attack success rate only. Task suites are versioned from v1 to v1.2.2 (added October 27th, 2025) with task fixes, and lab reports rarely say which suite version they ran.
- Made by
- ETH Zurich SPY Lab + Invariant Labs
- Released
- June 2024
- Kind
- Jailbreaks and prompt injection
- Level
- Everyday
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
-
Muse Spark 1.1 #47 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- August 2026, dropped before it saturated
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
AI agents aim to solve complex tasks by combining text-based reasoning with external tool calls. Unfortunately, AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks where data returned by external tools hijacks the agent to execute malicious tasks. To measure the adversarial robustness of AI agents, we introduce AgentDojo, an evaluation framework for agents that execute tools over untrusted data. To capture the evolving nature of attacks and defenses, AgentDojo is not a static test suite, but rather an extensible environment for designing and evaluating new agent tasks, defenses, and adaptive attacks. We populate the environment with 97 realistic tasks (e.g., managing an email client, navigating an e-banking website, or making travel bookings), 629 security test cases, and various attack and defense paradigms from the literature. We find that AgentDojo poses a challenge for both attacks and defenses: state-of-the-art LLMs fail at many tasks (even in the absence of attacks), and existing prompt injection attacks break some security properties but not all. We hope that AgentDojo can foster research on new design principles for AI agents that solve common tasks in a reliable and robust manner.. We release the code for AgentDojo at https://github.com/ethz-spylab/agentdojo.
Grok 4 Fast leads with 0% among models released by August 2026
Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) leads with 1.11% across all independent runs
Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.
Grok 4 Fast leads with 0%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 1 Grok 4 Fast 0%
- 2
Muse Spark 1.1 0.70%
- 3 Grok 4 2.00%
- 4 Grok 4.1 5.00%
- 5
Muse Spark 11.7%
- 6 grok-code-fast-1 26.9%
- 7
Muse Glimmer 28.4%
- 8 Grok 4.20 33%
Source: Labs’ model cards
- 1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 1.11%
- 2
Command R (03-2024) 3.34%
- 3
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 3.50%
- 4 GPT-4o May 2024, attack: direct 3.66%
- 5
Command R+ 4.45%
- 6 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 7.31%
- 7 Claude 3 Haiku 9.06%
- 8 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 10.3%
- 9 Claude 3 Opus 11.3%
- 10
Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 12.2%
- 11
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 17%
- 12
Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 17%
- 13
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 20.8%
- 14
Llama 3-70B 25.6%
- 15 Claude 3 Sonnet 26.7%
- 16 GPT-4o mini 27.2%
- 17 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 28.6%
- 18
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 28.6%
- 19 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 33.9%
- 20 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 56.3%
Source: Official AgentDojo leaderboard
- 1 Grok 4 Fast 0%
- 2
Muse Spark 1.1 0.70%
- 3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 1.11%
- 4 Grok 4 2.00%
- 5
Command R (03-2024) 3.34%
- 6
Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 3.50%
- 7 GPT-4o May 2024, attack: direct 3.66%
- 8
Command R+ 4.45%
- 9 Grok 4.1 5.00%
- 10 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 7.31%
- 11 Claude 3 Haiku 9.06%
- 12 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 10.3%
- 13 Claude 3 Opus 11.3%
- 14
Muse Spark 11.7%
- 15
Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 12.2%
- 16
Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 17%
- 17
Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 17%
- 18
Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 20.8%
- 19
Llama 3-70B 25.6%
- 20 Claude 3 Sonnet 26.7%
- 21 grok-code-fast-1 26.9%
- 22 GPT-4o mini 27.2%
- 23
Muse Glimmer 28.4%
- 24 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 28.6%
- 25
Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 28.6%
- 26 Grok 4.20 33%
- 27 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 33.9%
- 28 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 56.3%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official AgentDojo leaderboard
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4 Fast | 0% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 0.70% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Grok 4 | 2.00% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 4 | Grok 4.1 | 5.00% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 11.7% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 6 | grok-code-fast-1 | 26.9% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 7 | | 28.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 8 | Grok 4.20 | 33% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 1.11% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 2 | | 3.34% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 3 | | 3.50% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 3.66% | attack: direct | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | | 4.45% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 7.31% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude 3 Haiku | 9.06% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 10.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Claude 3 Opus | 11.3% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 12.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | | 17% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | | 17% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | | 20.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 25.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 26.7% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | GPT-4o mini | 27.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 28.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 28.6% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 33.9% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) | 56.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grok 4 Fast | 0% | Sep 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | | 0.70% | Jul 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 3 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) | 1.11% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | Grok 4 | 2.00% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 5 | | 3.34% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | | 3.50% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | GPT-4o May 2024 | 3.66% | attack: direct | May 2024 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 4.45% | Aug 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 9 | Grok 4.1 | 5.00% | Nov 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 10 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 7.31% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | Claude 3 Haiku | 9.06% | Mar 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 12 | GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 | 10.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 13 | Claude 3 Opus | 11.3% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | | 11.7% | Jun 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 15 | | 12.2% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 17% | Sep 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | | 17% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 20.8% | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | | 25.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude 3 Sonnet | 26.7% | Feb 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | grok-code-fast-1 | 26.9% | Aug 2025 | Lab model card | |
| 22 | GPT-4o mini | 27.2% | Jul 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 28.4% | Aug 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 24 | GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 | 28.6% | Apr 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 25 | | 28.6% | May 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | Grok 4.20 | 33% | Mar 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 27 | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 33.9% | Jun 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) | 56.3% | Jan 2024 | Official leaderboard |
The benchmark's own leaderboard has 20 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in June 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.
Sources: Official AgentDojo leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official AgentDojo leaderboard and labs’ model cards
Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | 28.4 | Siren AgentDojo Attack Success Rate 28.4 (lower is better), Utility 94.2 | |
| Mar 9, 2026 | Grok 4.20 | 33 | AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.33, Grok 4.2 SA, Table 1 |
8 system cards report it, from 2 labs
Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.
| Date | Document | Score | As the document writes it | Section |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | | 28.4 | Siren AgentDojo ASR@5, lower is better, utility 94.2, high (Tables 2 and 5) | Robustness |
| Jul 9, 2026 | | 0.7 | AgentDojo pass@1 ASR with SIREN attacker (Table 2, Figure 28) | Robustness |
| Jun 12, 2026 | | 11.7 | AgentDojo pass@1 ASR with SIREN attacker (Table 2, Figure 34) | Robustness |
| Apr 7, 2026 | Grok 4.20 model card | 33 | AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.33, Grok 4.2 SA, Table 1 | Robustness |
| Nov 17, 2025 | Grok 4.1 model card | 5 | AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.05, Grok 4.1 Thinking (Table 1) | Robustness |
| Sep 19, 2025 | Grok 4 Fast model card | 0 | AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.00, 0.03 non-reasoning (Table 1) | Robustness |
| Aug 26, 2025 | grok-code-fast-1 model card | 26.9 | AgentDojo, attack success rate 26.9 (Table 1) | Robustness |
| Aug 20, 2025 | Grok 4 model card | 2 | AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.02, Grok 4 API (Table 1) | Robustness |
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6%
- Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts.
Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
- DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics.
Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
- Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
- IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%