Benchmark Almanac

AgentDojo

Grok 4 Fast 0% leads since September 2025
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 1.11% leads since October 2024
Grok 4 Fast 0% leads since September 2025
Fading

Agents do tool-use tasks while tools and data carry prompt injections. Attack success rate counts hijacked runs.

Labs also report utility under attack. xAI reports attack success rate only. Task suites are versioned from v1 to v1.2.2 (added October 27th, 2025) with task fixes, and lab reports rarely say which suite version they ran.

Released
June 2024
Kind
Jailbreaks and prompt injection
Level
Everyday
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Agent task
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Muse Spark 1.1 #47 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
August 2026, dropped before it saturated
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI agents aim to solve complex tasks by combining text-based reasoning with external tool calls. Unfortunately, AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks where data returned by external tools hijacks the agent to execute malicious tasks. To measure the adversarial robustness of AI agents, we introduce AgentDojo, an evaluation framework for agents that execute tools over untrusted data. To capture the evolving nature of attacks and defenses, AgentDojo is not a static test suite, but rather an extensible environment for designing and evaluating new agent tasks, defenses, and adaptive attacks. We populate the environment with 97 realistic tasks (e.g., managing an email client, navigating an e-banking website, or making travel bookings), 629 security test cases, and various attack and defense paradigms from the literature. We find that AgentDojo poses a challenge for both attacks and defenses: state-of-the-art LLMs fail at many tasks (even in the absence of attacks), and existing prompt injection attacks break some security properties but not all. We hope that AgentDojo can foster research on new design principles for AI agents that solve common tasks in a reliable and robust manner.. We release the code for AgentDojo at https://github.com/ethz-spylab/agentdojo.

Abstract of AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents (arXiv:2406.13352, CC0)
8
Models scored in lab cards
2
Launch posts list it, from 2 labs
8
System cards report it, from 2 labs

Grok 4 Fast leads with 0% among models released by August 2026

Best score per model as labs report them in their own cards. Labs pick their own settings, so these compare less cleanly than independent runs.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) leads with 1.11% across all independent runs

Best score per model across the official leaderboard, Epoch AI’s own runs and any board Epoch AI copied. Each bar and row names its source.

Grok 4 Fast leads with 0%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has reported a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Grok 4 Fast 0%
  2. 2 Muse Spark 1.1 0.70%
  3. 3 Grok 4 2.00%
  4. 4 Grok 4.1 5.00%
  5. 5 Muse Spark 11.7%
  6. 6 grok-code-fast-1 26.9%
  7. 7 Muse Glimmer 28.4%
  8. 8 Grok 4.20 33%

Source: Labs’ model cards

#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Grok 4 Fast 0% Sep 2025 Lab model card
2 Muse Spark 1.1 0.70% Jul 2026 Lab model card
3 Grok 4 2.00% Aug 2025 Lab model card
4 Grok 4.1 5.00% Nov 2025 Lab model card
5 Muse Spark 11.7% Jun 2026 Lab model card
6 grok-code-fast-1 26.9% Aug 2025 Lab model card
7 Muse Glimmer 28.4% Aug 2026 Lab model card
8 Grok 4.20 33% Mar 2026 Lab model card
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 1.11% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
2 Command R (03-2024) 3.34% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
3 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 3.50% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-4o May 2024 3.66% attack: direct May 2024 Official leaderboard
5 Command R+ 4.45% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 7.31% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Claude 3 Haiku 9.06% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 10.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Claude 3 Opus 11.3% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
10 Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 12.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
11 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 17% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 17% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 20.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Llama 3-70B 25.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
15 Claude 3 Sonnet 26.7% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
16 GPT-4o mini 27.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
17 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 28.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 28.6% May 2024 Official leaderboard
19 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 33.9% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
20 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 56.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Grok 4 Fast 0% Sep 2025 Lab model card
2 Muse Spark 1.1 0.70% Jul 2026 Lab model card
3 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) 1.11% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
4 Grok 4 2.00% Aug 2025 Lab model card
5 Command R (03-2024) 3.34% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
6 Gemini 1.5 Flash Sep 2024 3.50% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
7 GPT-4o May 2024 3.66% attack: direct May 2024 Official leaderboard
8 Command R+ 4.45% Aug 2024 Official leaderboard
9 Grok 4.1 5.00% Nov 2025 Lab model card
10 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 7.31% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Claude 3 Haiku 9.06% Mar 2024 Official leaderboard
12 GPT-3.5 Turbo Jan 2024 10.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Claude 3 Opus 11.3% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Muse Spark 11.7% Jun 2026 Lab model card
15 Gemini 1.5 Flash May 2024 12.2% May 2024 Official leaderboard
16 Gemini 1.5 Pro Sep 2024 17% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
17 Gemini 2.0 Flash Dec 2024 17% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
18 Gemini 2.0 Flash Feb 2025 20.8% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
19 Llama 3-70B 25.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
20 Claude 3 Sonnet 26.7% Feb 2024 Official leaderboard
21 grok-code-fast-1 26.9% Aug 2025 Lab model card
22 GPT-4o mini 27.2% Jul 2024 Official leaderboard
23 Muse Glimmer 28.4% Aug 2026 Lab model card
24 GPT-4 Turbo Apr 2024 28.6% Apr 2024 Official leaderboard
25 Gemini 1.5 Pro May 2024 28.6% May 2024 Official leaderboard
26 Grok 4.20 33% Mar 2026 Lab model card
27 Claude 3.5 Sonnet 33.9% Jun 2024 Official leaderboard
28 GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 56.3% Jan 2024 Official leaderboard

The benchmark's own leaderboard has 20 models. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

2 models have held number one in labs’ own numbers since its release in June 2024 2 models have held number one across all independent runs since its release in June 2024 3 models have held number one with claims included since its release in June 2024

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release. We draw one row each for the benchmark’s own leaderboard and what labs claim in their cards.

Cohere Anthropic xAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Feb 2025
Lab claims 2 leaders

Sources: Official AgentDojo leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024) Command R (03-2024) Claude 3 Haiku GPT-4 Turbo (Jan 2024) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2024 2025 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 Claude 3.5 Sonnet (October 2024)

Sources: Official AgentDojo leaderboard and labs’ model cards

Labs headline it less often now, last in August 2026

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

xAI
Meta
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Aug 10, 2026 Muse Glimmer 28.4 Siren AgentDojo Attack Success Rate 28.4 (lower is better), Utility 94.2
Mar 9, 2026 Grok 4.20 33 AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.33, Grok 4.2 SA, Table 1

8 system cards report it, from 2 labs

Besides launch posts, we read the system cards, model cards and technical reports labs publish with a release. They report far more, including safety and frontier-risk tests.

DateDocumentScoreAs the document writes itSection
Oct 19, 2026 Muse Glimmer technical report 28.4 Siren AgentDojo ASR@5, lower is better, utility 94.2, high (Tables 2 and 5) Robustness
Jul 9, 2026 Muse Spark 1.1 system card 0.7 AgentDojo pass@1 ASR with SIREN attacker (Table 2, Figure 28) Robustness
Jun 12, 2026 Muse Spark system card 11.7 AgentDojo pass@1 ASR with SIREN attacker (Table 2, Figure 34) Robustness
Apr 7, 2026 Grok 4.20 model card 33 AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.33, Grok 4.2 SA, Table 1 Robustness
Nov 17, 2025 Grok 4.1 model card 5 AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.05, Grok 4.1 Thinking (Table 1) Robustness
Sep 19, 2025 Grok 4 Fast model card 0 AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.00, 0.03 non-reasoning (Table 1) Robustness
Aug 26, 2025 grok-code-fast-1 model card 26.9 AgentDojo, attack success rate 26.9 (Table 1) Robustness
Aug 20, 2025 Grok 4 model card 2 AgentDojo, attack success rate 0.02, Grok 4 API (Table 1) Robustness

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) In use Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage. Claude Opus 4.5 89%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%