Benchmark Almanac

Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark)

Claude Opus 4.5 89% leads since November 2025
Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 97.1% leads since October 2026
In use

Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage.

A lab result may use another attack subset than the board.

Released
October 2025
Kind
Jailbreaks and prompt injection
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Open-ended
Tasks
Public, plus a private test set
Strongest model tested
Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
Last in a launch post
October 2026
Last model added
October 2026
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are being deployed at scale, yet we lack a systematic understanding of how the choice of backbone LLM affects agent security. The non-deterministic sequential nature of AI agents complicates security modeling, while the integration of traditional software with AI components entangles novel LLM vulnerabilities with conventional security risks. Existing frameworks only partially address these challenges as they either capture specific vulnerabilities only or require modeling of complete agents. To address these limitations, we introduce threat snapshots: a framework that isolates specific states in an agent's execution flow where LLM vulnerabilities manifest, enabling the systematic identification and categorization of security risks that propagate from the LLM to the agent level. We apply this framework to construct the b³ benchmark, a security benchmark based on 194,331 unique crowdsourced adversarial attacks. We then evaluate 34 popular LLMs with it, revealing, among other insights, that enhanced reasoning capabilities improve security, while model size does not correlate with security. We release our benchmark, dataset, and evaluation code to facilitate widespread adoption by LLM providers and practitioners, offering guidance for agent developers and incentivizing model developers to prioritize backbone security improvements.

Abstract of Breaking Agent Backbones: Evaluating the Security of Backbone LLMs in AI Agents (arXiv:2510.22620, CC0)
36
Entries on its own leaderboard, 35 models we track
1
Launch post lists it, from 1 lab

Claude Opus 4.5 leads with 89% among models released by February 2026

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) leads with 97.1%, claims included

Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.

The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 89%
  2. 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 87.5%
  3. 3 Claude Opus 4.6 85.5%
  4. 4 GPT-5.2 thinking 79.6%
  5. 5 Grok 4 79.5%
  6. 6 Grok 4 Fast 75.2%
  7. 7 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 74.7%
  8. 8 GPT-5.1 thinking 72.9%
  9. 9 Claude Opus 4 72.6%
  10. 10 GPT-5 thinking 72%
  11. 11 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 71.1%
  12. 12 Gemini 3 Pro thinking 67.1%
  13. 13 Kimi K2 Thinking 65.7%
  14. 14 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) thinking 63.7%
  15. 15 o4-mini 59.6%
  16. 16 Gemma 3 27B 57.9%
  17. 17 gpt-oss-120b 55.6%
  18. 18 Ministral 3 14B 55%
  19. 19 gpt-oss-20b 55%
  20. 20 Claude 3.5 Haiku 53.9%
  21. 21 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 53.4%
  22. 22 Grok 3 53%
  23. 23 QwQ-32B thinking 52.2%
  24. 24 DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 51.9%
  25. 25 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.1%
  26. 26 DeepSeek-V3.1 50.3%
  27. 27 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 49.9%
  28. 28 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025, thinking 49.8%
  29. 29 GLM-4.5 48.6%
  30. 30 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 46.6%
  31. 31 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 44.9%
  32. 32 Mistral Medium 3.1 44.1%
  33. 33 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 41.7%
  34. 34 Qwen3-32B thinking 41.2%
  35. 35 Mistral Large 3 39.3%
  36. 36 GPT-4.1 37.3%

Source: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard

Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 Claude Opus 4.5 89% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Haiku 4.5 87.5% thinking Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Opus 4.6 85.5% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
4 GPT-5.2 79.6% thinking Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Grok 4 79.5% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Grok 4 Fast 75.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Claude Sonnet 4 74.7% thinking May 2025 Official leaderboard
8 GPT-5.1 72.9% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
9 Claude Opus 4 72.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
10 GPT-5 72% thinking Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
11 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 71.1% thinking Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Gemini 3 Pro 67.1% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Kimi K2 Thinking 65.7% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 63.7% thinking Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
15 o4-mini 59.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Gemma 3 27B 57.9% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
17 gpt-oss-120b 55.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Ministral 3 14B 55% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
19 gpt-oss-20b 55% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Claude 3.5 Haiku 53.9% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
21 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 53.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Grok 3 53% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 QwQ-32B 52.2% thinking Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek-V3.2 51.9% thinking Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
25 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.1% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
26 DeepSeek-V3.1 50.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 49.9% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 49.8% thinking Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
29 GLM-4.5 48.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 46.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
31 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 44.9% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
32 Mistral Medium 3.1 44.1% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
33 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 41.7% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen3-32B 41.2% thinking Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
35 Mistral Large 3 39.3% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
36 GPT-4.1 37.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
#ModelScoreSettingDateSource
1 Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 97.1% Oct 2026 Lab model card
2 Claude Opus 4.5 89% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Haiku 4.5 87.5% thinking Oct 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Claude Opus 4.6 85.5% Feb 2026 Official leaderboard
5 GPT-5.2 79.6% thinking Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Grok 4 79.5% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Grok 4 Fast 75.2% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
8 Claude Sonnet 4 74.7% thinking May 2025 Official leaderboard
9 GPT-5.1 72.9% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Claude Opus 4 72.6% May 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-5 72% thinking Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 71.1% thinking Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
13 Gemini 3 Pro 67.1% thinking Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
14 Kimi K2 Thinking 65.7% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
15 o4-mini 59.6% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
16 Gemma 3 27B 57.9% Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
17 gpt-oss-120b 55.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
18 Ministral 3 14B 55% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
19 gpt-oss-20b 55% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
20 Claude 3.5 Haiku 53.9% Oct 2024 Official leaderboard
21 DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 53.4% May 2025 Official leaderboard
22 Grok 3 53% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
23 QwQ-32B 52.2% thinking Mar 2025 Official leaderboard
24 DeepSeek-V3.2 51.9% thinking Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
25 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.1% Nov 2024 Official leaderboard
26 DeepSeek-V3.1 50.3% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
27 Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 49.9% Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
28 Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025 49.8% thinking Jun 2025 Official leaderboard
29 GLM-4.5 48.6% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
30 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 46.6% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
31 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 44.9% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
32 Mistral Medium 3.1 44.1% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
33 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 41.7% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
34 Qwen3-32B 41.2% thinking Apr 2025 Official leaderboard
35 Mistral Large 3 39.3% Dec 2025 Official leaderboard
36 GPT-4.1 37.3% Apr 2025 Official leaderboard

Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.

Scores at each effort level

Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.

Lowest effort to highest, light to dark
Claude Opus 4.5
thinking
89%
Claude Haiku 4.5
thinking
87.5%
Claude Opus 4.6
thinking
85.5%
GPT-5.2
thinking
79.6%
Grok 4
thinking
79.5%
Grok 4 Fast
thinking
75.2%
Claude Sonnet 4
thinking
74.7%
Claude Opus 4
thinking
72.6%
GPT-5
thinking
72%
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
thinking
71.1%
o4-mini
thinking
59.6%
gpt-oss-120b
thinking
55.6%

Source: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard

3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2025 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

xAI Anthropic
Own leaderboard Passed 85% in Oct 2025, by Claude Haiku 4.5

Source: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard

Claude Haiku 4.5 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in October 2025

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Reported by the lab in its model card Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) Claude Opus 4.5 Grok 4 Claude Sonnet 4 Claude 3.5 Haiku 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 2027 Near the ceiling (85%) Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) Claude Opus 4.5

Sources: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard and labs’ model cards

One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months

Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.

Mistral AI
DateLaunch postScoreAs the post writes it
Oct 29, 2026 Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 97.1 B3 Agent Security Benchmark, attack resistance

More in Safety and alignment

All 465 in Safety and alignment
  • FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
  • StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is. Inkling 98.6%
  • Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts. Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
  • DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics. Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
  • IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%
  • Broken Search Tool In use Models answer questions that need search while the search tool is broken. Scored on how often they fail to say the tool is unavailable. GPT-6 Cyber 0.33%