Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark)
Crowdsourced prompt-injection attacks hit backbone LLMs inside agent threat snapshots at three defense levels. The score is attack resistance, 100 minus the board's vulnerability percentage.
A lab result may use another attack subset than the board.
- Made by
- Lakera + ETH Zurich + UK AISI + Oxford
- Released
- October 2025
- Kind
- Jailbreaks and prompt injection
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Open-ended
- Tasks
- Public, plus a private test set
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 4.6 #37 on the capability index
- Last in a launch post
- October 2026
- Last model added
- October 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are being deployed at scale, yet we lack a systematic understanding of how the choice of backbone LLM affects agent security. The non-deterministic sequential nature of AI agents complicates security modeling, while the integration of traditional software with AI components entangles novel LLM vulnerabilities with conventional security risks. Existing frameworks only partially address these challenges as they either capture specific vulnerabilities only or require modeling of complete agents. To address these limitations, we introduce threat snapshots: a framework that isolates specific states in an agent's execution flow where LLM vulnerabilities manifest, enabling the systematic identification and categorization of security risks that propagate from the LLM to the agent level. We apply this framework to construct the b³ benchmark, a security benchmark based on 194,331 unique crowdsourced adversarial attacks. We then evaluate 34 popular LLMs with it, revealing, among other insights, that enhanced reasoning capabilities improve security, while model size does not correlate with security. We release our benchmark, dataset, and evaluation code to facilitate widespread adoption by LLM providers and practitioners, offering guidance for agent developers and incentivizing model developers to prioritize backbone security improvements.
Claude Opus 4.5 leads with 89% among models released by February 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Every run is in the next chart. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) leads with 97.1%, claims included
Best score per model from every source, including labs’ own numbers and claims Epoch AI collected from reports and papers. Labs pick their own settings, so a claim can beat an independent run of the same model.
The newest model with a score here came out in February 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 16 more
- 89.0 Claude Opus 4.5
- 87.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 85.5 Claude Opus 4.6
- 79.6 GPT-5.2
- 79.5 Grok 4
- 75.2 Grok 4 Fast
- 74.7 Claude Sonnet 4
- 72.9 GPT-5.1
- 72.6 Claude Opus 4
- 72.0 GPT-5
- 71.1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 67.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 65.7 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 63.7 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified)
- 59.6 o4-mini
- 57.9
Gemma 3 27B
- 55.6 gpt-oss-120b
- 55.0
Ministral 3 14B
- 55.0 gpt-oss-20b
- 53.9 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 53.4
DeepSeek-R1
- 53.0 Grok 3
- 52.2
QwQ-32B
- 51.9
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 51.1 GPT-4o
- 50.3
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 49.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 49.8
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 48.6 GLM-4.5
- 46.6
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 44.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 44.1
Mistral Medium 3.1
- 41.7 Kimi K2
- 41.2
Qwen3-32B
- 39.3
Mistral Large 3
- 37.3 GPT-4.1
- 1 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 89%
- 2 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 87.5%
- 3 Claude Opus 4.6 85.5%
- 4 GPT-5.2 thinking 79.6%
- 5 Grok 4 79.5%
- 6 Grok 4 Fast 75.2%
- 7 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 74.7%
- 8 GPT-5.1 thinking 72.9%
- 9 Claude Opus 4 72.6%
- 10 GPT-5 thinking 72%
- 11 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 71.1%
- 12
Gemini 3 Pro thinking 67.1%
- 13 Kimi K2 Thinking 65.7%
- 14 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) thinking 63.7%
- 15 o4-mini 59.6%
- 16
Gemma 3 27B 57.9%
- 17 gpt-oss-120b 55.6%
- 18
Ministral 3 14B 55%
- 19 gpt-oss-20b 55%
- 20 Claude 3.5 Haiku 53.9%
- 21
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 53.4%
- 22 Grok 3 53%
- 23
QwQ-32B thinking 52.2%
- 24
DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 51.9%
- 25 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.1%
- 26
DeepSeek-V3.1 50.3%
- 27
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 49.9%
- 28
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025, thinking 49.8%
- 29 GLM-4.5 48.6%
- 30
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 46.6%
- 31
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 44.9%
- 32
Mistral Medium 3.1 44.1%
- 33 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 41.7%
- 34
Qwen3-32B thinking 41.2%
- 35
Mistral Large 3 39.3%
- 36 GPT-4.1 37.3%
Source: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard
- 97.1
Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights)
- 89.0 Claude Opus 4.5
- 87.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
- 85.5 Claude Opus 4.6
- 79.6 GPT-5.2
- 79.5 Grok 4
- 75.2 Grok 4 Fast
- 74.7 Claude Sonnet 4
- 72.9 GPT-5.1
- 72.6 Claude Opus 4
- 72.0 GPT-5
- 71.1 Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- 67.1
Gemini 3 Pro
- 65.7 Kimi K2 Thinking
- 59.6 o4-mini
- 57.9
Gemma 3 27B
- 55.6 gpt-oss-120b
- 55.0
Ministral 3 14B
- 55.0 gpt-oss-20b
- 53.9 Claude 3.5 Haiku
- 53.4
DeepSeek-R1
- 53.0 Grok 3
- 52.2
QwQ-32B
- 51.9
DeepSeek-V3.2
- 51.1 GPT-4o
- 50.3
DeepSeek-V3.1
- 49.9
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
- 49.8
Gemini 2.5 Flash
- 48.6 GLM-4.5
- 46.6
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 44.9
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct
- 44.1
Mistral Medium 3.1
- 41.7 Kimi K2
- 41.2
Qwen3-32B
- 39.3
Mistral Large 3
- 37.3 GPT-4.1
- 1
Mistral Large 4 (Le Chonk, open weights) 97.1%
- 2 Claude Opus 4.5 thinking 89%
- 3 Claude Haiku 4.5 thinking 87.5%
- 4 Claude Opus 4.6 85.5%
- 5 GPT-5.2 thinking 79.6%
- 6 Grok 4 79.5%
- 7 Grok 4 Fast 75.2%
- 8 Claude Sonnet 4 thinking 74.7%
- 9 GPT-5.1 thinking 72.9%
- 10 Claude Opus 4 72.6%
- 11 GPT-5 thinking 72%
- 12 Claude 3.7 Sonnet thinking 71.1%
- 13
Gemini 3 Pro thinking 67.1%
- 14 Kimi K2 Thinking 65.7%
- 15 o4-mini 59.6%
- 16
Gemma 3 27B 57.9%
- 17 gpt-oss-120b 55.6%
- 18
Ministral 3 14B 55%
- 19 gpt-oss-20b 55%
- 20 Claude 3.5 Haiku 53.9%
- 21
DeepSeek-R1 May 2025 53.4%
- 22 Grok 3 53%
- 23
QwQ-32B thinking 52.2%
- 24
DeepSeek-V3.2 thinking 51.9%
- 25 GPT-4o Nov 2024 51.1%
- 26
DeepSeek-V3.1 50.3%
- 27
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Jun 2025 49.9%
- 28
Gemini 2.5 Flash Jun 2025, thinking 49.8%
- 29 GLM-4.5 48.6%
- 30
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 46.6%
- 31
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct Jul 2025 44.9%
- 32
Mistral Medium 3.1 44.1%
- 33 Kimi K2 Sep 2025 41.7%
- 34
Qwen3-32B thinking 41.2%
- 35
Mistral Large 3 39.3%
- 36 GPT-4.1 37.3%
Sources: Labs’ model cards and official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 89% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 87.5% | thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 85.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | GPT-5.2 | 79.6% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Grok 4 | 79.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 6 | Grok 4 Fast | 75.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 74.7% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.1 | 72.9% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Claude Opus 4 | 72.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | GPT-5 | 72% | thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 71.1% | thinking | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | | 67.1% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 65.7% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 14 | Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) | 63.7% | thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 15 | o4-mini | 59.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 57.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | gpt-oss-120b | 55.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 55% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | gpt-oss-20b | 55% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 53.9% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 53.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Grok 3 | 53% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 52.2% | thinking | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 51.9% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 51.1% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 50.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 49.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 49.8% | thinking | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | GLM-4.5 | 48.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 46.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 44.9% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 44.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 41.7% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 41.2% | thinking | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | | 39.3% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GPT-4.1 | 37.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| # | Model | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | 97.1% | Oct 2026 | Lab model card | |
| 2 | Claude Opus 4.5 | 89% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 87.5% | thinking | Oct 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | Claude Opus 4.6 | 85.5% | Feb 2026 | Official leaderboard | |
| 5 | GPT-5.2 | 79.6% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Grok 4 | 79.5% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 7 | Grok 4 Fast | 75.2% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 8 | Claude Sonnet 4 | 74.7% | thinking | May 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-5.1 | 72.9% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 10 | Claude Opus 4 | 72.6% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 11 | GPT-5 | 72% | thinking | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | 71.1% | thinking | Feb 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 13 | | 67.1% | thinking | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 14 | Kimi K2 Thinking | 65.7% | Nov 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 15 | o4-mini | 59.6% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 16 | | 57.9% | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 17 | gpt-oss-120b | 55.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 18 | | 55% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 19 | gpt-oss-20b | 55% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 20 | Claude 3.5 Haiku | 53.9% | Oct 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 21 | | 53.4% | May 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 22 | Grok 3 | 53% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 23 | | 52.2% | thinking | Mar 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 24 | | 51.9% | thinking | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 25 | GPT-4o Nov 2024 | 51.1% | Nov 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 26 | | 50.3% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 27 | | 49.9% | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 28 | | 49.8% | thinking | Jun 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 29 | GLM-4.5 | 48.6% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 30 | | 46.6% | Dec 2024 | Official leaderboard | |
| 31 | | 44.9% | Jul 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 32 | | 44.1% | Aug 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 33 | Kimi K2 Sep 2025 | 41.7% | Sep 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 34 | | 41.2% | thinking | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
| 35 | | 39.3% | Dec 2025 | Official leaderboard | |
| 36 | GPT-4.1 | 37.3% | Apr 2025 | Official leaderboard |
Labs report scores for 1 model in their cards. Switch the scores above to rank them together.
Scores at each effort level
Models the leaderboard ran at two or more effort levels. We don’t have enough cost data here to say what the extra effort costs.
Source: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard
3 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in October 2025 4 models have held number one with claims included since its release in October 2025
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard
Claude Haiku 4.5 on the official leaderboard passed 85% in October 2025
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Sources: Official Lakera B3 (Backbone Breaker Benchmark) leaderboard and labs’ model cards
One lab put it in a launch post in the last six months
Launch posts from every lab that has listed it, one tick per post. Tall colored ticks include it, and short gray ones leave it out.
| Date | Launch post | Score | As the post writes it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | 97.1 | B3 Agent Security Benchmark, attack resistance |
More in Safety and alignment
- FORTRESS In use Paired adversarial and benign national-security misuse prompts. Rubric-graded risk score on adversarial and over-refusal score on benign prompts. Claude Opus 5.5 5.78%
- StrongREJECT In use Forbidden-prompt jailbreak benchmark with a rubric grader that scores how useful a non-refusal actually is.
Inkling 98.6%
- Gray Swan IPI Arena benchmark In use Indirect prompt-injection attacks from public red-teaming competitions replayed on tool, coding and browser agents. Attack success rate at k attempts.
Gemini 4 Carbon 0%
- DistressBench In use Models reply as a chatbot to 718 simulated users in psychological crisis, in single-turn and multi-turn chats. Three judge models score replies against clinician-written rubrics.
Muse Spark 1.2 88.4%
- IHEval In use Models face conflicts between system, user and tool instructions. Reports a composite score for following the higher-priority instruction. GPT-4o 70%
- Broken Search Tool In use Models answer questions that need search while the search tool is broken. Scored on how often they fail to say the tool is unavailable. GPT-6 Cyber 0.33%