Apodex Discovery
Solver systems of model, harness and tools run long, verifiable investigations on high-value problems scouted from 561 industries in 16 sectors.
73 HF paper upvotes. It is also a framework for building such systems, so check which parts are a fixed benchmark.
- Made by
- Apodex
- Released
- August 2026
- Kind
- Research science
- Level
- Research frontier
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Strongest model tested
- GPT-6 Astra #3 on the capability index
- Last model added
- September 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Apollo did not reach the Moon merely because its engineers could solve difficult equations. It succeeded by turning a distant ambition into a mission architecture of explicit objectives, simulation, verification, and repeated correction. AI now faces a similar transition: frontier models can solve difficult tasks once the problem, tools, and success criteria are specified, yet consequential real-world challenges rarely arrive in an executable or verifiable form. We introduce Apodex Discovery, a framework for building and evaluating discoverative AI through the heavy-duty solver, a system comprising a foundation model, harness, tools, and control policies that pursues extended, stateful, verifiable investigations. It has three core components. First, a problem-scouting process surveyed 561 industries across 16 sectors, assembled 423 high-value real-world problems, and selected 20 for the initial release. Second, a common environment-task-episode abstraction provides data, tools, constraints, feedback, trajectory recording, and verification of intermediate artifacts and final submissions. Third, HDS6 evaluates Tools, Repair, Alternatives, Coherence, Evidence, and Scope independently of final-task success. In AAV capsid design, Apodex surpassed the published state of the art by 7% across viability, tropism, structure prediction, and generative design. In drug repurposing and reformulation, a task-specific biomedical environment improved the mean normalized prediction score of GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6-sol by 2.5 and 7.6 points over the same closed-book backbone. Controlled ablations show that the fixed TRACES episode interface enables attribution of performance differences to specific solver components. Apodex Discovery moves AI evaluation beyond predefined benchmarks toward verifiable investigations aimed at genuine discovery.
GPT-6 Astra leads with 2.80 among models released by September 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in September 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- Claude Opus 5.5
- GPT-6.1 Sol
- and 12 more
- 1 GPT-6 Astra TRACES 2.80
- 2 Claude Opus 5 TRACES 2.74
- 3 apodex-1.1 TRACES 2.71
- 4
Qwen 3.8 Max TRACES 2.66
- 5 Kimi K3 TRACES 2.61
- 6
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash TRACES 2.55
- 7 GLM-5.3 TRACES 2.45
- 8 GPT-5.6 Sol TRACES 2.27
- 9 GPT-5.5 TRACES 2.25
Source: Official Apodex Discovery leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-6 Astra | 2.80 | TRACES, pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 2.74 | TRACES, pi | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | apodex-1.1 | 2.71 | TRACES, coralopencode | Official leaderboard | |
| 4 | | 2.66 | TRACES, pi | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Kimi K3 | 2.61 | TRACES, pi | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | | 2.55 | TRACES, pi | Sep 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GLM-5.3 | 2.45 | TRACES, pi | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 2.27 | TRACES, pi | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | GPT-5.5 | 2.25 | TRACES, pi | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
2 models have held number one on the official leaderboard since its release in August 2026
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official Apodex Discovery leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official Apodex Discovery leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%