ASI-Bench
AI systems try to explore unknown problems, create new knowledge and turn new ideas into verifiable results, rather than apply learned knowledge.
70 upvotes on Hugging Face papers and 305 GitHub stars.
- Made by
- Apexin AI
- Released
- August 2026
- Kind
- Research science
- Level
- Research frontier
- Scored
- Checked automatically
- Answers
- Agent task
- Tasks
- All public
- Strongest model tested
- Claude Opus 5 #10 on the capability index
- Last model added
- August 2026
- Scores refreshed
- November 12th, 2026
In the authors’ words
Artificial superintelligence (ASI) requires AI to move beyond mastering existing knowledge toward exploring the unknown, creating new knowledge, and turning new ideas into verifiable results. However, the capabilities of today's AI systems are still largely built on learning, compressing, and applying existing human knowledge. Accordingly, existing benchmarks primarily test whether AI can produce correct answers based on learned knowledge, or whether it can complete tasks under extensive human guidance. We therefore introduce ASI-Bench, the first benchmark to jointly evaluate AI systems' capabilities of innovative exploration and autonomous scientific execution across general research domains, and the first to progressively withdraw human methodological guidance within the same research project to test how far AI can proceed on its own. Built by over 40 experts with the cost of 31,000+ human hours, ASI-Bench contains 60 project-level research tasks across 11 scientific domains and progressively reduces methodological guidance to test whether AI can independently select methods, conduct research, and produce verifiable results. All tasks undergo expert review, AI-assisted auditing, sandbox execution, and scorer validation. Across 18 state-of-the-art agent–model configurations, the average score drops from 50.91 with full methodological guidance to 29.10 with only the method specified and 26.62 when agents must determine the method themselves. This sharp decline shows that current systems remain heavily dependent on human guidance and are still far from autonomously conducting end-to-end, project-level scientific research. ASI-Bench is open to the world. We invite researchers and builders everywhere to contribute new tasks, challenge the limits of today's AI, and help accelerate humanity's collective path toward artificial superintelligence at https://asibench.apexin.ai/submit.
GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 55.8 among models released by August 2026
Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.
The newest model with a score here came out in August 2026, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:
- Claude Fable 5.2
-
Gemini 4 Carbon
- GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5
- and 13 more
- 1 GPT-5.6 Sol ultra 55.8
- 2 Claude Opus 5 50.3
- 3 GLM-5.3 41.6
- 4 GPT-5.5 xhigh 38.1
- 5 Claude Opus 4.8 37.5
- 6 Kimi K3 37.1
- 7 GLM-5.2 35.6
- 8
DeepSeek-V4-Flash 31.9
- 9 Kimi K2.7 27.3
- 10
MiniMax-M3 26.6
- 11
DeepSeek-V4-Pro 25.0
- 12 MiMo-V2.5-Pro 23.3
Source: Official ASI-Bench leaderboard
| # | Entry | Score | Setting | Date | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 55.8 | ultra, Codex | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 2 | Claude Opus 5 | 50.3 | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 3 | GLM-5.3 | 41.6 | Claude Code | Aug 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 4 | GPT-5.5 | 38.1 | xhigh, Codex | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 5 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 37.5 | Claude Code | May 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 6 | Kimi K3 | 37.1 | Claude Code | Jul 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 7 | GLM-5.2 | 35.6 | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 8 | | 31.9 | Claude Code | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 9 | Kimi K2.7 | 27.3 | Claude Code | Official leaderboard | |
| 10 | | 26.6 | Claude Code | Jun 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 11 | | 25.0 | Claude Code | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
| 12 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 23.3 | Claude Code | Apr 2026 | Official leaderboard |
Number one over time
Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.
Source: Official ASI-Bench leaderboard
Scores over time
All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.
Source: Official ASI-Bench leaderboard
No lab model card reports it yet
We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.
More in Science and reasoning
- GPQA Diamond In use 198 graduate-level 'Google-proof' multiple-choice questions in biology, chemistry and physics.
Gemini 4 Carbon 96.5%
- Terminal-Bench-Science In use 70 scientific research-workflow tasks across five science areas, run in Harbor containers. Hidden tests give the resolution rate. GPT-6 Astra 68.1%
- FrontierScience In use Models solve physics, chemistry, and biology problems in an Olympiad track graded by short answer and a Research track graded by 10-point rubrics.
Intern-S2-397B 87%
- BioMysteryBench In use Bioinformatics problems on anonymized real datasets that require real analysis with tools. Rubric-graded, with human-solvable and human-difficult splits. Claude Fable 5.2 83.7%
- HiPhO In use Models solve theory problems from 2024 and 2025 physics olympiad exams, some with diagrams. Official marking schemes grade answers and steps, mapped to medal levels.
Gemini 3 Pro 78.3%
- LABBench2 In use 11 biology research sub-tasks (literature, figures, tables, patents, trials and more) with tool access. Macro-averaged accuracy. GPT-5.2 60.9%