Benchmark Almanac

AutoBaxBench

GPT-5 45% leads since December 2025
Not in model cards

Models write backend servers for tasks that a pipeline generated. Tests and exploits are generated too. A larger task set built in the style of BaxBench.

560 tasks from 40 generated scenarios across 14 backend frameworks and three difficulty levels. Built by the AutoBaxBuilder pipeline, ICML 2026. MIT licensed. The makers do not call it BaxBench 2.

Released
December 2025
Kind
Secure code and review
Level
Expert
Scored
Checked automatically
Answers
Code
Tasks
All public
Strongest model tested
Gemini 3 Pro #55 on the capability index
Last model added
November 2025
Scores refreshed
November 12th, 2026

In the authors’ words

As large language models (LLMs) see wide adoption in software engineering, the reliable assessment of the correctness and security of LLM-generated code is crucial. Notably, prior work showed that LLMs are prone to generating code with security vulnerabilities, highlighting that security is often overlooked. These insights were enabled by specialized benchmarks crafted by security experts through significant manual effort. However, benchmarks (i) inevitably end up contaminating training data, (ii) must extend to new tasks to provide a more complete picture, and (iii) must increase in difficulty to challenge more capable LLMs. In this work, we address these challenges and present AutoBaxBuilder, an automated pipeline that generates code security benchmarking tasks from scratch. It leverages the code-understanding capabilities of LLMs combined with robust reliability checks to construct functional tests and end-to-end security-probing exploits. The quality of the pipeline is quantitatively confirmed by aligning its predictions with an expert-written baseline and qualitatively validated through manual soundness verification. We use AutoBaxBuilder to construct a new benchmark and release it to the public as AutoBaxBench, together with a thorough evaluation on contemporary LLMs. AutoBaxBuilder generates new tasks in under 2 hours, for less than USD 4. Including a manual verification, this reduces the required human effort for benchmark construction by a factor of 12.

Abstract of AutoBaxBuilder: Bootstrapping Code Security Benchmarking (arXiv:2512.21132, CC0)
14
Entries on its own leaderboard, 11 models we track

GPT-5 leads with 45% among models released by November 2025

Best score per entry from the benchmark's own leaderboard, read on November 12th, 2026. Where a model ran with several settings or harnesses, we keep its best. Names in gray aren't in our model list: fine-tunes, agent systems, products and older models. They don't count toward leaders.

The newest model with a score here came out in November 2025, and nobody has tested a newer one. Among the 20 highest-ranked models on the capability index, these have no score yet:

  1. 1 GPT-5 45%
  2. 2 Claude Sonnet 4 37.9%
  3. 3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 35.5%
  4. 4 Gemini 3 Pro 34.5%
  5. 5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 32.1%
  6. 6 Grok 4 30.7%
  7. 7 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 27.9%
  8. 8 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified) 25%
  9. 9 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 16.4%
  10. 10 Codestral 9.52%
  11. 11 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 9.29%
  12. 12 Qwen2.5-72B 6.67%
  13. 13 Llama 3.3 70B 5.00%
  14. 14 Qwen2.5-7B 2.41%

Source: Official AutoBaxBench leaderboard

#EntryScoreSettingDateSource
1 GPT-5 45% Aug 2025 Official leaderboard
2 Claude Sonnet 4 37.9% May 2025 Official leaderboard
3 Claude Sonnet 4.5 35.5% Sep 2025 Official leaderboard
4 Gemini 3 Pro 34.5% Nov 2025 Official leaderboard
5 Claude 3.7 Sonnet 32.1% Feb 2025 Official leaderboard
6 Grok 4 30.7% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
7 Gemini 2.5 Pro (snapshot unspecified) 27.9% Official leaderboard
8 DeepSeek R1 (snapshot unspecified) 25% Official leaderboard
9 Qwen3-Coder-480B-A35B 16.4% Jul 2025 Official leaderboard
10 Codestral 9.52% Jan 2025 Official leaderboard
11 GPT-4o (snapshot unspecified) 9.29% Official leaderboard
12 Qwen2.5-72B 6.67% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard
13 Llama 3.3 70B 5.00% Dec 2024 Official leaderboard
14 Qwen2.5-7B 2.41% Sep 2024 Official leaderboard

Number one over time

Lab claims count from the day the card came out, independent runs from the model’s release.

OpenAI
Own leaderboard Not tested since Dec 2025
GPT-5 45%

Source: Official AutoBaxBench leaderboard

Scores over time

All the scores we have, one dot each, so a model tested at several settings appears more than once.

On the benchmark’s own leaderboard Best so far
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 Claude Sonnet 4 Claude 3.7 Sonnet Codestral Qwen2.5-72B 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2025 2026 Near the ceiling (85%) GPT-5 Claude Sonnet 4

Source: Official AutoBaxBench leaderboard

No lab model card reports it yet

We read the headline results of 522 launch posts from 52 labs, and none of them list this benchmark.

More in Cybersecurity

All 115 in Cybersecurity
  • ExploitGym In use 869 real-vulnerability exploit-development tasks (userspace, V8, Linux kernel). Success means capturing a flag through the intended vulnerability. GPT-6 Astra 42.4%
  • ExploitBench In use 41 recent V8 JavaScript-engine N-day vulnerabilities. Progress measured by 16 grader-verified capability flags across five tiers. GPT-6 Astra 100%
  • CyberBench v1.1 (Vals) In use Agents work on OSS-Fuzz memory-safety bugs from ARVO images in two tracks. They write a proof-of-concept input that crashes the target, or patch the source so the crash stops and tests still pass. Muse Wonder 80.4%
  • SRE-Bench In use Software reverse engineering without source: 262 binary instances from 19 private programs, each with six graded objectives. GPT-6 Astra 56.9%
  • CyScenarioBench In use Scenario-based long-horizon security challenges in sandboxes, organized in task, scenario and campaign tiers. Evaluation set kept private. Gemini 4 Argon 100%
  • ExploitBench - Internal Port In use Agents develop working exploits for recently disclosed vulnerabilities to limit contamination. Scored as arbitrary code execution success rate. GPT-6 Cyber 42%